The Girls Who Broke Your Heart Thread

[Sharmai]

Ignore Grobbee. He's just being his name...

[Lowk]

Originally Posted by GrobbeeTrull2.0

You are heart-broken.
You were courting this girl, and fucking others.
You were in love.
You were not reciprocated in this love.
You wanted to quit your job and move to be with her, without reciprocated love.
You have a big issue with religion with a girl you "love"

I am pretty sure you didn't read most of that right...

I'll let Aych fill you in on a better story if he chooses, but he did not say "i have a big issue with her religion" he said "Also there's a big issue with religion"

She is a Muslim from what i remember, if you can't see how that could be a problem(issue) for any kind of long term that is outside of anyone's control..then....well

[GrobbeeTrull2.0]

Originally Posted by Sharmai

Ignore Grobbee. He's just being his name...

You're one championing someone's moral fortitude and you also think it's ok for six young black kids to beat someone within an inch of their life who may or may not have been involved in racial epiteth's being flung around - all in the name of "deep roots."

Just because someone tells you you're right, Sharmai, doesn't mean you are. He's acting like an emotionally stunted child, and looking for reinforcement and pats on the back.

[GrobbeeTrull2.0]

Originally Posted by Lowk

I am pretty sure you didn't read most of that right...

I'll let Aych fill you in on a better story if he chooses, but he did not say "i have a big issue with her religion" he said "Also there's a big issue with religion"

She is a Muslim from what i remember, if you can't see how that could be a problem(issue) for any kind of long term that is outside of anyone's control..then....well

I'm not sure how anyone's personal religious beliefs will jive with Aychamo's hatred of religion. The fact that someone is Muslim doesn't matter. Oh, she's in photos without her burka on and I can see the outline of her legs! She must be horribly fundamentalist and without compromise.

[Lefazz]

Originally Posted by Sharmai

Is it the assumption that there are men who want to film their sex with women or that they want to do so without permission? Because in either case there are a LOT OF MEN who like to do just that.

Are is it the implied idea that filming someone without their permission is = to instability?

I don't know what the definition of "unstable" is being used here. But I would say that the person in question lacks empathy towards these individuals which is most certainly a sociopathic trait.

Sociopath from dictionary.com:

a person, as a psychopathic personality, whose behavior is antisocial and who lacks a sense of moral responsibility or social conscience.

[Sharmai]

Originally Posted by GrobbeeTrull2.0

You're one championing someone's moral fortitude and you also think it's ok for six young black kids to beat someone within an inch of their life who may or may not have been involved in racial epiteth's being flung around - all in the name of "deep roots."

Just because someone tells you you're right, Sharmai, doesn't mean you are. He's acting like an emotionally stunted child, and looking for reinforcement and pats on the back.

See what I mean?

[Sharmai]

Originally Posted by Lefazz

I don't know what the definition of "unstable" is being used here. But I would say that the person in question lacks empathy towards these individuals which is most certainly a sociopathic trait.

Sociopath from dictionary.com:

Which is a problem because its classifying something with relation to right vs wrong. Not based on any specific criteria. Something which is morally objectionable to today's society will not be to tomorrows and so on there for this sliding scale used to define sociopath is quite useless.

[GrobbeeTrull2.0]

You're crazy.

Lacking empathy isn't anything related to right and wrong at all. And in reference to your claim that he's not anti-social, if he's doing anything AGAINST SOCIETY'S STANDARDS, it is by definition ANTI SOCIAL. The stigma attached is fine, whatever, but it doesn't make it any less true. You can't possibly argue semantics on this.

[Lefazz]

Originally Posted by Sharmai

Something which is morally objectionable to today's society will not be to tomorrows

That's what we're talking about, though: TODAY's society. Not society in 300BC where it was perfectly acceptable to video tape yourself having sex with an unknowing partner.

[Lowk]

Originally Posted by GrobbeeTrull2.0

I'm not sure how anyone's personal religious beliefs will jive with Aychamo's hatred of religion. The fact that someone is Muslim doesn't matter. Oh, she's in photos without her burka on and I can see the outline of her legs! She must be horribly fundamentalist and without compromise.

I am getting trolled but i don't care....

I have no insight on how it may be a problem for Aych specifically, but i am fully aware of how some first or second generation Muslim familys treat marriage in America, not referring to the girl in question, but her parents. When your parents would pretty much disown you for marrying anything but a Muslim, it can get complicated. Please try and avoid the cliche comment of : Well if the relationship is meant to be it will work. In reality, it doesn't work like that, only in Hollywood do things like this work this 100% of the time.

[Lowk]

Originally Posted by Lefazz

That's what we're talking about, though: TODAY's society. Not society in 300BC where it was perfectly acceptable to video tape yourself having sex with an unknowing partner.

No one video taped anything, it was broadcasted. ( It's semantics, yes i know) I think there is a big difference between something that is forever, and something that was done as a joke once, that will never be seen again.

[Designz]

People who think aychamo's mentality is good for any sort of relationship have serious fixing to do! Of course, this forum is not the place to do it!

[GrobbeeTrull2.0]

You're right. One video tape versus a live audience is surely less viewers.

[Sharmai]

Originally Posted by Lefazz

That's what we're talking about, though: TODAY's society. Not society in 300BC where it was perfectly acceptable to video tape yourself having sex with an unknowing partner.

I'm sorry let me put it in different words then. Something which is objectionable to chicago is not to new yorkers. Something which is objectionable to Chille is not to the US.

Something which is objectionable 5 minutes from now may not be 10 minutes from now. Got it now? Its a sliding fucking scale on morals. Its whatever the moral majority decide at that particular time. Its not right, its group think.

Hey when the last time you sped? Guess what. You just broke the law. sociopath.

Aw hell who am I kidding. If you don't understand the flaws inherent in using the baseline definition of sociopath let alone any clinical mental diagnosed disorder then you don't deserve to be using the term even in casual conversation. Its to complicated for you.

[Lefazz]

Originally Posted by GrobbeeTrull2.0

You're crazy.

Lacking empathy isn't anything related to right and wrong at all.

It depends on what it is, but the lack of empathy towards others can translate into cruelty to others -- which, while most of you will disagree with me here I'm sure, I would definitely say that what he is doing is a form of cruelty.