Funny, Strange, Random Pics

[Grimmlokk]

I think he may have actually taken some off Madonna.

[Zhavric]

Originally Posted by Grimmlokk

I think he may have actually taken some off Madonna.

Pics made me think of...

[Snugglebear]

Originally Posted by Screamfeeder

It's a bad morph job of Miriam Offersgaard. This guy apparently just takes pictures of girls and goes to town on em with photochop to the point of stupidity.
I'm not positive, but I think this puts him pretty close to furries with his huge-muscle-woman fetish. Laws may be being broken. Not sure which ones, but I'm sure at least one.
Here are some other choice selections from his site.

That site disturbs the piss out of me.

[Seventh]

Originally Posted by Snugglebear

That site disturbs the piss out of me.

+1. That's friggin' creepy.

Pic unrelated: Spiffy ambient door lighting on my new car.

[dy fey]

Originally Posted by Tuco

Anyone else find legs like this:

if a girl had spaghetti legs, but a nice ass, then it's all good. legs just kind of bring it together for me, but they're not a necessity.

to demonstrate this, i submit aimee mullins

[Zhavric]

Originally Posted by dy fey

if a girl had spaghetti legs, but a nice ass, then it's all good. legs just kind of bring it together for me, but they're not a necessity.

to demonstrate this, i submit aimee mullins

If you were with her, would you try to put it in her stumps?

[Screamfeeder]

Originally Posted by Fediel

why are people so eager to make things illegal that they personally disprove of but doesn't hurt others?

Woah calm the hell down O' Defender of Furries and Muscle Fetishists.

I was just mildly sarcastically commenting on the fact that he spends quite a lot of time making underage female gymnasts look like Lou Ferrigno. I didn't come in here waving my morality flag and crying to make shit illegal.

I could care less if he wants to do it, but I'm going to call creepy when I see creepy.

[CalhoonJugganaut]

Panamanian Cricket Players...yes, please.

[Fediel]

Originally Posted by Screamfeeder

Woah calm the hell down O' Defender of Furries and Muscle Fetishists.

I was just mildly sarcastically commenting on the fact that he spends quite a lot of time making underage female gymnasts look like Lou Ferrigno. I didn't come in here waving my morality flag and crying to make shit illegal.

I could care less if he wants to do it, but I'm going to call creepy when I see creepy.

I don't disagree that I also personally find it creepy. And I am not going to defend the sexualization of minors either. I just don't like the slippery slope of trying to make things that some people find offensive - especially between consenting adults - to be illegal. Now we have a French 3 strikes law where the ISP claims you were downloading - there is no trial and you lose your internet access. Even if you were sharing material you created or had a French equivalent of fair use going on.

[Zennin]

Originally Posted by Fediel

I don't disagree that I also personally find it creepy. And I am not going to defend the sexualization of minors either. I just don't like the slippery slope of trying to make things that some people find offensive - especially between consenting adults - to be illegal. Now we have a French 3 strikes law where the ISP claims you were downloading - there is no trial and you lose your internet access. Even if you were sharing material you created or had a French equivalent of fair use going on.

hold on bro, are you saying you find young teenage girls turned into superhulk sexually gratifying?! ha!!

obligapic:

[Mario Speedwagon]

.

[Mario Speedwagon]

some more

[Mario Speedwagon]

last one

[Fediel]

Originally Posted by Zennin

hold on bro, are you saying you find young teenage girls turned into superhulk sexually gratifying?! ha!!

Why don't you reread what I wrote. Clearly I was stating that I don't defend or approve of the sexualization of minors. Of course, different cultures (looking at you Japan) define minors differently but I don't see anybody (even the female muscle photoshoppers) focusing on sexualizing toddlers. That takes it to a different place than where they are taking it. My point was that photoshops of women's muscles gets frowned upon but photoshops of women's breasts is applauded and encouraged. Why such disparity?

[possible]

Originally Posted by Fediel

Why don't you reread what I wrote. Clearly I was stating that I don't defend or approve of the sexualization of minors. Of course, different cultures (looking at you Japan) define minors differently but I don't see anybody (even the female muscle photoshoppers) focusing on sexualizing toddlers. That takes it to a different place than where they are taking it. My point was that photoshops of women's muscles gets frowned upon but photoshops of women's breasts is applauded and encouraged. Why such disparity?

I think it's time to relax guy.