Fires of Heaven Guild Message Board  

Go Back   Fires of Heaven Guild Message Board > Fires of Heaven Related Forums > Retard Rickshaw
User Name
Password
ForumSpy Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

View Poll Results: Who will win?
McCain 436 32.30%
Obama 914 67.70%
Voters: 1350. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 05-30-2008, 08:33 PM   #1171 (permalink)
Zora
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 369
+0 Internets
Quote:
Originally Posted by renaissance View Post
I hope Obama is a hell of a lot smarter than to pick Hagel as his veep... jesus. Do you realize the VP has a HUGE chance at becoming President after Obama's term is over? Do you want Chuck fucking Hagel as President of the United States?
Also if, heaven forbid, something should happen to Obama during his term.

Hagel is right on the war but isn't he very conservative on social issues?
Zora is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2008, 08:39 PM   #1172 (permalink)
Zora
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 369
+0 Internets
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mimirswell View Post
False, only 14 Vice Presidents became President. Of those, 4 became president due to assassination (T. Roosevelt, A. Johnson, Arthur, L Johnson). Another 4 have come from deaths (Tyler, Fillmore, Truman, Coolidge). One came from resignation (Ford). The five who became presidents via election are John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Martin Van Buren, Richard Nixon, and George Bush.

So 5 out of 43 is only 11.6% chance. Now, McCain's VP does have a HUGE chance of becoming President should McCain have two terms but given Obama's youth and his released medical records.
Why remove assassination and even other causes of death or resignation from the equation? Stuff happens. It's not like any of it is impossible under an Obama administration. Some would say that an assassination attempt is more likely than usual.
Zora is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2008, 08:43 PM   #1173 (permalink)
Mimirswell
ex scientia lux
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 546
I had hoped to prevent exactly this type of response when I bolded the appropriate keyword when I quoted him. I am very aware of the possibility of assassination but I was addressing a common misunderstanding in American Politics (that VP's often successfully follow the coat-tails of the president into office).

Last edited by Mimirswell : 05-31-2008 at 12:12 AM. Reason: spelling
Mimirswell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2008, 11:37 PM   #1174 (permalink)
AngryGerbil
zero signal
 
AngryGerbil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 3,549
...
__________________
Doesn't speak the language. Holds no currency.
AngryGerbil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2008, 12:49 AM   #1175 (permalink)
Kolle
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,879
-25 Internets
well...a VP has won the presidency twice in the last 20 years. i think overall something like 14(15) VPs did so. it's not a bad place to be.

if i was Obama i would rather have someone that wasn't interested in being president, tho.
Kolle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2008, 01:06 AM   #1176 (permalink)
Mimirswell
ex scientia lux
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 546
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kolle View Post
well...a VP has won the presidency twice in the last 20 years. i think overall something like 14(15) VPs did so. it's not a bad place to be.
Twice in the last 40 years. Richard Nixon became President in 1969 (39 years ago) and George Bush became President in 89 (19 years ago). Five VPs of Forty-six have become Presidents via election. There are certainly worse places to be but it's as much of a hindrance as it is a help (See Gore, Mondale, and Humphrey for more recent incidents of failed candidacies following terms as VP).
Mimirswell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2008, 01:07 AM   #1177 (permalink)
Kolle
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,879
-25 Internets
twice in the last 20 years
Kolle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2008, 01:09 AM   #1178 (permalink)
Mimirswell
ex scientia lux
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 546
You probably want to make another thread for a derail of that size.
Mimirswell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2008, 11:42 AM   #1179 (permalink)
Soriak
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 4,743
+29 Internets
Nice remarks from Obama: The Page - by Mark Halperin - TIME

Quote:
“There are honest differences about how to move forward in Iraq, just like there were honest differences about whether or not we should go to war. John McCain was for the invasion of Iraq; I opposed it. John McCain wants to continue George Bush’s war in Iraq indefinitely; I want to end it. So there’s going to be a clear choice for the American people this November.

“But that’s not what John McCain’s been talking about the last few days. He’s been proposing a joint trip to Iraq that’s nothing more than a political stunt. He’s even been using it to raise a few dollars for his campaign. But it seems like Senator McCain’s a lot more interested in my travel plans than the facts, because yesterday – in his continued effort to put the best light on a failed policy – he stood up in Wisconsin and said, “We have drawn down to pre-surge levels” in Iraq.

“That’s not true, and anyone running for Commander-in-Chief should know better. As the saying goes, you’re entitled to your own view, but not your own facts. We’ve got around 150,000 troops in Iraq – 20,000 more than we had before the surge. We have plans to get down to around 140,000 later this summer – that’s still more troops than we had in Iraq before the surge. And today, Senator McCain refused to correct his mistake. Just like George Bush, when he was presented with the truth, he just dug in and refused to admit his mistake. His campaign said it amounts to “nitpicking.”

“Well I don’t think tens of thousands of American troops amounts to nitpicking. Tell that to the young men and women who are serving bravely and brilliantly under our flag. Tell that to the families who have seen their loved ones fight tour after tour after tour of duty in a war that should’ve never been authorized and never been waged.

“It’s time for a debate that’s based on the truth, and I can’t think of anything more important than how many Americans are in harm’s way. It’s time for a debate that’s based on how we’re going to end this war – not a debate that’s based on raising a few dollars for John McCain’s campaign.

“The American people have had enough spin. Just this week, we were reminded by President Bush’s own former spokesman of how it was deception – not straight talk – that misled the American people into war. It’s time to cut through the tough talk so that we can be straight with the American people about a war that’s cost us thousands of lives and hundreds of billions of dollars without making us safer. It’s time to end the political game-playing so that we can finally end this war. That’s what I’ll do in this campaign. And that’s what I’ll do when I’m President of the United States.”
Soriak is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2008, 11:52 AM   #1180 (permalink)
Bristlebane
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,856
The Obama Gaffe Machine - WSJ.com

Quote:
"As smart and credentialed as he is, Sen. Obama is often an indifferent speaker without a teleprompter. He has large gaps in his knowledge base, and is just as likely to dig in and embrace a policy misstatement as abandon it. ABC reporter Jake Tapper calls him "a one-man gaffe machine."
Bristlebane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2008, 01:00 PM   #1181 (permalink)
renaissance
I <3 boobies
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 837
+6 Internets
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mimirswell View Post
False, only 14 Vice Presidents became President. Of those, 4 became president due to assassination (T. Roosevelt, A. Johnson, Arthur, L Johnson). Another 4 have come from deaths (Tyler, Fillmore, Truman, Coolidge). One came from resignation (Ford). The five who became presidents via election are John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Martin Van Buren, Richard Nixon, and George Bush.

So 5 out of 43 is only 11.6% chance. Now, McCain's VP does have a HUGE chance of becoming President should McCain have two terms but given Obama's youth and his released medical records.
Saying that the VP doesn't have an enormous chance to become president in the next cycle is a ridiculous statement, disproven by your own calculation.

Do YOU have an 11% chance of becoming President? How about any Governor? Senator? Congressman? Private citizen? Yah... thought so. 11% is a huge probability in this kind of contest.

Also, that percentage is low. You say only 14 have become president. That is of total VPs. How many VPs have actually run for the position and not become president? I bet that represents a very different percentage, and would be a more accurate representation of the statistic, since, if you don'\t run, your chances of becoming president are close to 0%.

**Edit** By my count, only 24 VPs have even sought their party's nomination to become president (this doesn't include assassinations). So your number should be more like 21%. A 1 in 5 chance is a lottery I'd like to buy a ticket in any day of the week.

Last edited by renaissance : 05-31-2008 at 01:16 PM.
renaissance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2008, 01:23 PM   #1182 (permalink)
Mimirswell
ex scientia lux
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 546
Aside from the previously enumerated VPs who won, the following VPs failed to become President:
  1. A. Burr
  2. G. Clinton
  3. J. Breckinridge
  4. J. Sherman
  5. C. Dawes
  6. J. Garner
  7. H. Wallace
  8. A. Barkley
  9. H. Humphrey
  10. W. Mondale
  11. A. Gore
So 11/16 (69%) who tried, failed. It should also be noted that of the 5 who succeeded, Adams and Jefferson would of become President regardless of the Vice Presidency and during their Vice Presidency, they were largely ignored by their respective Presidents due to the way the process worked at the time (2nd place for President was VP and thus your primary opposition). So really, you are looking at only 3 VPs who were successfully elected upon the Coattails of the previous administration (MvB from Andrew Jackson, Nixon from Eisenhower though not successively, failed the first time, and Bush from Reagan).

Also, your argument versus the random person on the street becoming President versus a Vice President is incredibly ignorant. Vice Presidents are not random people picked off the street and then due solely to their time as Vice Presidents, suddenly capable of launching a successful presidential campaign. They are life long politicians who the VP is simply one more step along the way and more often than not, a misstep if their true ambition is to be President.

Last edited by Mimirswell : 05-31-2008 at 01:27 PM.
Mimirswell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2008, 01:30 PM   #1183 (permalink)
renaissance
I <3 boobies
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 837
+6 Internets
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mimirswell View Post
Aside from the previously enumerated VPs who won, the following VPs failed to become President:
  1. A. Burr
  2. G. Clinton
  3. J. Breckinridge
  4. J. Sherman
  5. C. Dawes
  6. J. Garner
  7. H. Wallace
  8. A. Barkley
  9. H. Humphrey
  10. W. Mondale
  11. A. Gore
So 11/16 (69%) who tried, failed. It should also be noted that of the 5 who succeeded, Adams and Jefferson would of become President regardless of the Vice Presidency and during their Vice Presidency, they were largely ignored by their respective Presidents due to the way the process worked at the time (2nd place for President was VP and thus your primary opposition). So really, you are looking at only 3 VPs who were successfully elected upon the Coattails of the previous administration (MvB from Andrew Jackson, Nixon from Eisenhower, and Bush from Reagan).

Also, your argument versus the random person on the street becoming President versus a Vice President is incredibly ignorant. Vice Presidents are not random people picked off the street and then due solely to their time as Vice Presidents, suddenly capable of launching a successful presidential campaign. They are life long politicians who the VP is simply one more step along the way and more often than not, a misstep if their true ambition is to be President.
Oh, so it's even more? A Veep has a 31% chance of becoming President if he runs... ya I guess that`s not very high...

It`s not ignorant in the least. The VP has a 31% chance of winning. Forget private citizens, calculate the chances of a Senator, a Majority leader, a Speaker of the house, a governor, etc etc etc. No other position has a higher rate of creating presidents than the Vice Presidency.
renaissance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2008, 01:44 PM   #1184 (permalink)
Mimirswell
ex scientia lux
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 546
Five governors of New York have successfully been elected President.
Mimirswell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2008, 01:59 PM   #1185 (permalink)
Malakriss
Your lack of intelligence is an insult to humanity. Get a fucking clue
 
Malakriss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Obviousville
Posts: 2,749
3 succeeded, 2 defaulted, 11 failed.

Using percentages on sample sizes less than 100 is retarded.
Malakriss is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
uberguilds network



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6