Quantcast MMOs as an outlet for [future] child predators? - Page 3 - Fires of Heaven Guild Message Board
Fires of Heaven Guild Message Board  

Go Back   Fires of Heaven Guild Message Board > Fires of Heaven Related Forums > Retard Rickshaw
User Name
Password
ForumSpy Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 09-09-2007, 08:58 AM   #31 (permalink)
tad10
Too tired to fight about it.
 
tad10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,562
-54 Internets
You know I'm probably one of the 5 most conservative guys who post on this board -- and while I think the pervs in this guild are pretty disgusting there is nothing illegal about two adults playacting nazi child ass rape or whatever. This is not Canada or wherever with fucked up hate speech laws & etc.

Blizzard is probably better off not trying to monitor the chat that goes in its games -- beyond say gold spamming. I don't pretend to be an FA or privacy lawyer but say they voluntarily turn over the names of everyone in this guild to the FBI it is a good bet that they could end up getting sued for violating some random privacy law.
__________________
Surface - Drunken Monk of Seradon (ret)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeste View Post
Something I've always wondered.
The general idea from most conspiracy theorists is that the government is mostly incompetent. Except for when it comes to cover-ups. With that, they are so efficient that there's almost zero undeniable evidence. That can't do anything else efficiently, but somehow they are able to cover things up so well that no one has ever been able to successfully uncover a cover-up. JFK, The moon landing, lizard people.
tad10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2007, 09:01 AM   #32 (permalink)
Mist
Extremely Busy DPS Provider
 
Mist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,230
-100 Internets
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndersJ View Post
Oh I can separate real life from fantasy.

Night Elves, Orcs, Taurens... all fantasy. Running people over in GTA... fantasy. Shooting Nazi's in Medal of Honor... fantasy.

Lilith the Night Elf Rogue wanting to sexually seduce someone who claims to be 18 who is playing a 6 year old is beyond make believe. That's where the line is drawn. There were already statements of sub-18 people who were in that guild with stuff going on.
Then it's the responsibility of their adult guardian that allowed them to play the game in the first place to monitor their activities. And exactly what line is drawn there? Your line maybe, but no legal line is drawn there, at least not in the US. Only once REAL sex with a REAL child is solicited is it a crime.

Last edited by Mist; 09-09-2007 at 09:04 AM..
Mist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2007, 09:08 AM   #33 (permalink)
Malakriss
GOMTV Contest Winner
 
Malakriss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 4,559
Quote:
Blizzard is probably better off not trying to monitor the chat that goes in its games -- beyond say gold spamming. I don't pretend to be an FA or privacy lawyer but say they voluntarily turn over the names of everyone in this guild to the FBI it is a good bet that they could end up getting sued for violating some random privacy law.
There is no expectation of privacy on a subscription gaming service. By the nature of the game everything is visible to someone else and not personal. Thus it is public, not private and not protected. Any actions that are not only a violation of ToS or EULA but something criminal as well will expedite matters.
__________________
So your GearScore is over 9000?
But after cross referencing your RealID and
checking freecreditreport.com I can see that your
CreditScore is under 600

Last edited by Malakriss; 09-09-2007 at 09:13 AM..
Malakriss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2007, 09:13 AM   #34 (permalink)
Twobit Whore
Insert Quarter
 
Twobit Whore's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 13,307
-24 Internets
Just because it is visible to Blizzard doesn't make it public.
Twobit Whore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2007, 09:18 AM   #35 (permalink)
Malakriss
GOMTV Contest Winner
 
Malakriss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 4,559
Tells/whispers are visible to the reciever.
Say, emote, combat are visible to anyone in the area.
Zone/Local channels and chat channels are sent to everyone applicable.
Sending Mail or using the auction house leaves your character graphically visible.
There is no /anon or /role feature in WoW, anyone can know if you're online, and where you are at all times.
__________________
So your GearScore is over 9000?
But after cross referencing your RealID and
checking freecreditreport.com I can see that your
CreditScore is under 600
Malakriss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2007, 09:23 AM   #36 (permalink)
Quineloe
Hard Rock Hallelujah
 
Quineloe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 10,880
Quote:
Originally Posted by Malakriss View Post
There is no expectation of privacy on a subscription gaming service. By the nature of the game everything is visible to someone else and not personal. Thus it is public, not private and not protected. Any actions that are not only a violation of ToS or EULA but something criminal as well will expedite matters.
dear god you're completly ignorant.
Quineloe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2007, 09:23 AM   #37 (permalink)
Mist
Extremely Busy DPS Provider
 
Mist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,230
-100 Internets
Quote:
Originally Posted by Malakriss View Post
There is no expectation of privacy on a subscription gaming service. By the nature of the game everything is visible to someone else and not personal. Thus it is public, not private and not protected. Any actions that are not only a violation of ToS or EULA but something criminal as well will expedite matters.
You could make the same argument for the telephone company. Just because they have the phsyical ability to monitor, does not give them the right to monitor unless law enforcement authorizes it. Reporting personal information and non-crimes to the FBI definitely would be a violation of privacy.

Last edited by Mist; 09-09-2007 at 09:26 AM..
Mist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2007, 09:27 AM   #38 (permalink)
Rythonn
Registered User
 
Rythonn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,908
Having sex with a child virtual or not is never ok, even southpark knows this. Blizzard needs to disband the guild, there are far too many kids playing this game to let that shit go on.
Rythonn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2007, 09:31 AM   #39 (permalink)
AndersJ
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 55
+0 Internets
Well this topic is on the WoW General Forum. Someone from Ravenholdt stated they had caught one of the guild members trying to push this form of cyber on another person but Blizzard deleted the thread.

Either way, this screenshot got posted:



I don't even know what to think.
AndersJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2007, 09:31 AM   #40 (permalink)
Twobit Whore
Insert Quarter
 
Twobit Whore's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 13,307
-24 Internets
So roleplay fantasies aren't okay? If your wife/gf/bf/husband wants to pretend to be a child during sex.. are you breaking a law?
Twobit Whore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2007, 09:36 AM   #41 (permalink)
Rythonn
Registered User
 
Rythonn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,908
Honestly letting something like this continue the game should be an M rating. Mist trying to defend the laws is ridiculous. Look to movies if you need an example, specially not in an rated Teen game. This just freaks me out because my kids play this game.
Rythonn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2007, 09:37 AM   #42 (permalink)
Rythonn
Registered User
 
Rythonn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by Twobit Whore View Post
So roleplay fantasies aren't okay? If your wife/gf/bf/husband wants to pretend to be a child during sex.. are you breaking a law?
Illegal? No. Extremely disturbing? Yes. You also aren't allowed to talk about it to some kids the next day.
Rythonn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2007, 09:43 AM   #43 (permalink)
Drajakur
I have a competition in me.
 
Drajakur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: In the clinch.
Posts: 925
+23 Internets
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rythonn View Post
Illegal? No. Extremely disturbing? Yes. You also aren't allowed to talk about it to some kids the next day.
Word. It makes me sick how people (*cough* Mist *cough*) try and finagle around the issue by making it a question of law when law is totally irrelevant. The point is morality. And it is immoral, and wrong in that sense, to pretend to have sex with a fucking kid if you are doing it in cyberspace, real-space, your own space, or another consenting adult's.

Maybe there is nothing illegal going on here, maybe not. But who gives a shit. What counts is that these people are scum and should be treated as such.

Blizzard is totally within their rights to permit and not permit actions they deem as unsavory within the confines of their game, and I hope they do something about it.
Drajakur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2007, 09:48 AM   #44 (permalink)
The Ancient
where is my mind
 
The Ancient's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,185
+46 Internets
Mist is dead on though, the legality of it is what a number of people have chosen to make the issue. The fact of the matter is, it's Blizzard's job to regulate this stuff not the laws. If children were being threatened that's another story but right now all we are looking at is some people with some odd sexual fetishes expressing them. Let's say the guild exercises all due diligences to make sure that no actual children are involved, are their activities still what you would consider criminal?

Edit: Wait I noticed Mist seems to be saying Blizzard has no right to monitor this stuff which is definately incorrect. It's their game they can do whatever the fuck they want, the telephone company is a public utility, not at all the same thing.

Last edited by The Ancient; 09-09-2007 at 09:50 AM..
The Ancient is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2007, 09:48 AM   #45 (permalink)
Mist
Extremely Busy DPS Provider
 
Mist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,230
-100 Internets
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drajakur View Post
Word. It makes me sick how people (*cough* Mist *cough*) try and finagle around the issue by making it a question of law when law is totally irrelevant. The point is morality. And it is immoral, and wrong in that sense, to pretend to have sex with a fucking kid if you are doing it in cyberspace, real-space, your own space, or another consenting adult's.

Maybe there is nothing illegal going on here, maybe not. But who gives a shit. What counts is that these people are scum and should be treated as such.

Blizzard is totally within their rights to permit and not permit actions they deem as unsavory within the confines of their game, and I hope they do something about it.
Killing people, particularly killing people because of their race, is also immoral. Should all guilds be considered Virtual Murder Clubs? (Would be a good guildname btw.)
Mist is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

uberguilds network



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6