Olsen or Olsen?

RiskyChris · 01-19-2006, 01:13 PM

*cracks knuckles*

Last semester I was up late doing work, when I happened into an argument with some friends about the attractiveness of anorexic chicks. They all seemed to be fine with fucking them, but I brought up the Olsen twins at their worst anorexic moments (*shiver*). I went so far as to proclaim I'd rail the Olsen twins as Michelle from Full House before touching the 18+ ones.

What do you choose? I'll start off with a vote for the toddlers.

simeon · 01-19-2006, 01:14 PM

umm... no

eXarc · 01-19-2006, 01:15 PM

ok?

edit: why do rich ppl dress so terribly

Dintorr · 01-19-2006, 01:21 PM

Damn they have some big feet.

Arbuste · 01-19-2006, 01:26 PM

I read that study that said that the size of your feet is directly related to the size of... hmm what? Nevermind.

Worfless · 01-19-2006, 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RiskyChris

*cracks knuckles*

Last semester I was up late doing work, when I happened into an argument with some friends about the attractiveness of anorexic chicks. They all seemed to be fine with fucking them, but I brought up the Olsen twins at their worst anorexic moments (*shiver*). I went so far as to proclaim I'd rail the Olsen twins as Michelle from Full House before touching the 18+ ones.

What do you choose? I'll start off with a vote for the toddlers.

you're gay, there's nothing to be attracted to in the toddlers. the legal edition at least has some perks

Zistrix · 01-19-2006, 01:27 PM

So the olsen's sizely feet = sizely vagina?

eXarc · 01-19-2006, 01:33 PM

are they loose

Nikkohung You · 01-19-2006, 01:34 PM

i dont know about ya'll but i likve the gina small and tight, not big and gaping.

damn theose clodhoppers dont need snow shoes.

Wiretwister · 01-19-2006, 01:44 PM

Whichever one is on the right in that picture is fugly

Zistrix · 01-19-2006, 01:47 PM

Quote:

i dont know about ya'll but i likve the gina small and tight, not big and gaping.

Ya when a newborn baby could walk out of the vagina its probably too loose

Zinke · 01-19-2006, 02:11 PM

It's the pointy shoe and the flatness of the heel that make their feet look ginormous. Your used to seeing girls in high heels, rounded off sneakers or sandals.
With a heel, the foot looks shorter because it goes up instead. With sneakers or sandals, you don't have a pointed toe like that. That reaffirms that they are dressed badly, however they have average-small sized feet.

simeon · 01-19-2006, 02:26 PM

I would still fuck the shit out of the one on the left.

masteen · 01-19-2006, 02:31 PM

I would have the bulimic one blow me and then vomit my splooge into her sister's mouth.

Metranon · 01-19-2006, 03:33 PM

gay thread

shock value= zero

01-19-2006, 01:13 PM	#1 (permalink)
RiskyChris Safety Dance Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: West Lafayette Posts: 5,485 -6 Internets	Olsen or Olsen? cracks knuckles Last semester I was up late doing work, when I happened into an argument with some friends about the attractiveness of anorexic chicks. They all seemed to be fine with fucking them, but I brought up the Olsen twins at their worst anorexic moments (shiver). I went so far as to proclaim I'd rail the Olsen twins as Michelle from Full House before touching the 18+ ones. What do you choose? I'll start off with a vote for the toddlers. __________________

01-19-2006, 01:15 PM	#3 (permalink)
eXarc Banned Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 980 +0 Internets	ok? edit: why do rich ppl dress so terribly Last edited by eXarc : 01-19-2006 at 01:23 PM.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

01-19-2006, 01:14 PM	#2 (permalink)
simeon Banned Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: O_o Posts: 704 +2 Internets	umm... no

01-19-2006, 01:21 PM	#4 (permalink)
Dintorr space accountant Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Atlanta, Chocolate City, USA Posts: 771 -2 Internets	Damn they have some big feet.

01-19-2006, 01:26 PM	#5 (permalink)
Arbuste This calls for the league of Evil! Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 717 -1 Internets	I read that study that said that the size of your feet is directly related to the size of... hmm what? Nevermind.

01-19-2006, 01:27 PM	#7 (permalink)
Zistrix The Overkill Killer Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 1,063	So the olsen's sizely feet = sizely vagina?

01-19-2006, 01:33 PM	#8 (permalink)
eXarc Banned Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 980 +0 Internets	are they loose

01-19-2006, 01:44 PM	#10 (permalink)
Wiretwister Registered User Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Central Florida Posts: 180 -1 Internets	Whichever one is on the right in that picture is fugly

01-19-2006, 02:11 PM	#12 (permalink)
Zinke I think I'm drunk enough to drive you home. Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: What is, is. Posts: 2,458 +0 Internets	It's the pointy shoe and the flatness of the heel that make their feet look ginormous. Your used to seeing girls in high heels, rounded off sneakers or sandals. With a heel, the foot looks shorter because it goes up instead. With sneakers or sandals, you don't have a pointed toe like that. That reaffirms that they are dressed badly, however they have average-small sized feet.

01-19-2006, 02:26 PM	#13 (permalink)
simeon Banned Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: O_o Posts: 704 +2 Internets	I would still fuck the shit out of the one on the left.

01-19-2006, 02:31 PM	#14 (permalink)
masteen Registered User Join Date: Mar 2002 Posts: 1,297	I would have the bulimic one blow me and then vomit my splooge into her sister's mouth.

01-19-2006, 03:33 PM	#15 (permalink)
Metranon Banned Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: BC, Canada Posts: 1,599 +0 Internets	gay thread shock value= zero