Fires of Heaven Guild Message Board  

Go Back   Fires of Heaven Guild Message Board > Fires of Heaven Related Forums > Retard Rickshaw
User Name
Password
Or, use your gamerDNA username: (more...)
ForumSpy Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 10-12-2005, 12:47 PM   #1 (permalink)
paanar
probably....
 
paanar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: 80011
Posts: 328
+0 Internets
Send a message via AIM to paanar
sorili (sp?)

Yah, that dude who kicked me from the irc channel... you still suck.

Shamans is the plural of Shaman.

Fag.
__________________
Affliction Lock vs. Affliction Lock. Lol, they'll kill each other.
paanar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2005, 12:51 PM   #2 (permalink)
Grayson Carlyle
Warrior of Blackhand
 
Grayson Carlyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Blackhand
Posts: 671
Send a message via ICQ to Grayson Carlyle Send a message via AIM to Grayson Carlyle
Quote:
Originally Posted by paanar
Shamans is the plural of Shaman.
Arguing when you're wrong is a good way to get banned.
__________________

Grayson Carlyle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2005, 12:52 PM   #3 (permalink)
ElGallo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 166
+0 Internets
It's not the OED, but it appears that he's not wrong.
http://merriam-webster.com/cgi-bin/d...nary&va=shaman
ElGallo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2005, 12:56 PM   #4 (permalink)
Grayson Carlyle
Warrior of Blackhand
 
Grayson Carlyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Blackhand
Posts: 671
Send a message via ICQ to Grayson Carlyle Send a message via AIM to Grayson Carlyle
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElGallo
It's not the OED, but it appears that he's not wrong.
http://merriam-webster.com/cgi-bin/d...nary&va=shaman
It also lists fishes as a possible plural of fish.
__________________

Grayson Carlyle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2005, 12:59 PM   #5 (permalink)
Warrian
crushin' them guts
 
Warrian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 978
-49 Internets
http://wowwiki.vlad1.com/Shaman_Spelling

I think we have a winner.
__________________
Warrian Retired.
Warrian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2005, 01:00 PM   #6 (permalink)
Grayson Carlyle
Warrior of Blackhand
 
Grayson Carlyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Blackhand
Posts: 671
Send a message via ICQ to Grayson Carlyle Send a message via AIM to Grayson Carlyle
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warrian
You'd have to pronounce it with a short 'a' for shamans to make sense. It's quite obvious the plural of shaman is shaman.
__________________

Grayson Carlyle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2005, 01:01 PM   #7 (permalink)
Warrian
crushin' them guts
 
Warrian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 978
-49 Internets
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grayson Carlyle
You'd have to pronounce it with a short 'a' for shamans to make sense. It's quite obvious the plural of shaman is shaman.
Whatever you say, pal.
__________________
Warrian Retired.
Warrian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2005, 01:04 PM   #8 (permalink)
Cad
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,397
My guess would be shamans as well.
Cad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2005, 01:04 PM   #9 (permalink)
FuckYou
snape kills razorgore
 
FuckYou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,714
+1 Internets
this ho needs a pimp slap like only the Black Hand can deliver
__________________
vagoo the belf paladin and yiff the belf rogue
just the tip - black dragonflight
FuckYou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2005, 01:13 PM   #10 (permalink)
ElGallo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 166
+0 Internets
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grayson Carlyle
It also lists fishes as a possible plural of fish.
It is archiac to use "fishes" to refer to a number of fish of the same type (e.g. Jesus multiplied loaves and fishes). However, "fishes" is a correct plural form of fish when you are talking about multiple species of fish.

Quote:
Some nouns, mainly names of birds, fishes, and mammals, have the same form in the plural as in the singular: bison, deer, moose, sheep, swine. Some words that follow this pattern, such as antelope, cod, crab, elk, fish, flounder, grouse, herring, quail, reindeer, salmon, shrimp, and trout, also have regular plurals ending in -s: antelope, antelopes; fish, fishes; salmon, salmons. Normally in such cases the unchanged plural indicates that the animal in question is being considered collectively, while the plural ending in -s is used specifically to indicate different varieties or species or kinds: We caught six fish but Half a dozen fishes inhabit the lake. By far, however, most animal names take a regular plural: dogs, cats, lions, monkeys, whales.
http://www.bartleby.com/64/81.html
ElGallo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2005, 01:52 PM   #11 (permalink)
Worfless
Registered User
 
Worfless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,680
-1 Internets
shaman : shamans :: paladin : faggots
Worfless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2005, 04:36 PM   #12 (permalink)
Warrik
Ive been reading these boards since noows....that makes me uber
 
Warrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 2,093
-3 Internets
Who cares?
Warrik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2005, 05:13 AM   #13 (permalink)
Metranon
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 1,599
+0 Internets
Send a message via MSN to Metranon
what did you think the plural was, Shamen? that sounds even more retardeder
Metranon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2005, 11:17 AM   #14 (permalink)
frott
Banned
 
frott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,390
+0 Internets
Shamans is the plural of shaman.

However, remember that dictionaries are DEscriptive not PREscriptive: they describe what people say. There really are no rules behind word formation, it sort of has to catch on... but ...

... in the case of "shaman" there are very specific rules regarding inherited words versus adapted words, and so you pluralize it by saying "shamans."

Arguing it is ridiculous, as none of us invented the term shaman and are basically referring to some resource regarding it. For my resource, I'll choose every single dictionary and encyclopedia I've ever seen.
frott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2005, 04:57 PM   #15 (permalink)
masteen
Registered User
 
masteen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,311
I say we change it to shamenz!
masteen is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
uberguilds network



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6