Fires of Heaven Guild Message Board  

Go Back   Fires of Heaven Guild Message Board > Fires of Heaven Related Forums > Retard Rickshaw Hall of Shame
User Name
Password
Or, use your gamerDNA username: (more...)
ForumSpy Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 07-12-2009, 11:46 PM   #2221 (permalink)
Screamfeeder
I MAEK ART!!
 
Screamfeeder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,930
+169 Internets
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam DeathWalker View Post
The chart posted prevsly shows that adulthood begins when puberty ends. Is that correct? Or is that incorrect.
That's right it did. Notice at which point it's fully green. 18-19. Notice when that orange bar finally stops? 17-18.

So yeah, it's correct. You fucked a child. Which is wrong.
Screamfeeder is offline  
Old 07-12-2009, 11:48 PM   #2222 (permalink)
Mario Speedwagon
Registered User
 
Mario Speedwagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: 3rd Place
Posts: 2,121
-47 Internets
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam DeathWalker View Post
If a person has an arrest for using drugs and is an admitted drug addict is it legal for them to go on welfare? Of corse it is. So giving someone who is a known drug addict money (which a high probobility it will be spent on drugs) is clearly not moraly reprehensible or illegal; even though it is to their long term disadvantage.


The reason the thread is getting dull is that since screefeeder started poisting there have been intelligent arguments made that require intelliget rebuttle. To much reasoning and not enough "Yur a Pedo-Fag". Well I dont mind intellegent debate.
If you honestly see absolutely nothing morally reprehensible about paying a 15 year old drug addict to blow, when you are age 31, and you know for a fact that she is a habitually drug users then you are a sociopath.
Mario Speedwagon is offline  
Old 07-12-2009, 11:48 PM   #2223 (permalink)
tikkus
Registered User
 
tikkus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,450
-21 Internets
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam DeathWalker View Post
If a person has an arrest for using drugs and is an admitted drug addict is it legal for them to go on welfare? Of corse it is. So giving someone who is a known drug addict money (which a high probobility it will be spent on drugs) is clearly not moraly reprehensible or illegal; even though it is to their long term disadvantage.


The reason the thread is getting dull is that since screefeeder started poisting there have been intelligent arguments made that require intelliget rebuttle. To much reasoning and not enough "Yur a Pedo-Fag". Well I dont mind intellegent debate.
It varies from state to state, but if you have any drug related offenses it keeps you from getting on welfare. You're just a halfwit.
__________________
http://celebribooty.com/ - my bread and butter

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam DeathWalker View Post
some people have more money then sense
tikkus is offline  
Old 07-12-2009, 11:48 PM   #2224 (permalink)
Sam DeathWalker
Registered User
 
Sam DeathWalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sam DeathWalker RoXoRs yur BoXoRs!
Posts: 760
+50 Internets
Keep in mind that she signed the documnets saying her rights were violated BOTH before she was 18 AND after she was 18.
__________________

Sam DeathWalker is offline  
Old 07-12-2009, 11:49 PM   #2225 (permalink)
Screamfeeder
I MAEK ART!!
 
Screamfeeder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,930
+169 Internets
Wonderful. You still fucked a kid. Which is wrong.
Screamfeeder is offline  
Old 07-12-2009, 11:49 PM   #2226 (permalink)
Sam DeathWalker
Registered User
 
Sam DeathWalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sam DeathWalker RoXoRs yur BoXoRs!
Posts: 760
+50 Internets
It varies from state to state, but if you have any drug related offenses it keeps you from getting on welfare

Then you are legally elligable for SSI because you cant work or get a job ....
__________________

Sam DeathWalker is offline  
Old 07-12-2009, 11:50 PM   #2227 (permalink)
Goanad
Registered User
 
Goanad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Iraq
Posts: 238
-13 Internets
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam DeathWalker View Post
Keep in mind that she signed the documnets saying her rights were violated BOTH before she was 18 AND after she was 18.
Meth does bad things to peeps, mmkay?
Goanad is offline  
Old 07-12-2009, 11:51 PM   #2228 (permalink)
Sam DeathWalker
Registered User
 
Sam DeathWalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sam DeathWalker RoXoRs yur BoXoRs!
Posts: 760
+50 Internets
That's right it did. Notice at which point it's fully green. 18-19. Notice when that orange bar finally stops? 17-18.

Puberty ends at 18, just when adulthood starts, is that what you are saying? For Females or Males?
__________________

Sam DeathWalker is offline  
Old 07-12-2009, 11:52 PM   #2229 (permalink)
Sam DeathWalker
Registered User
 
Sam DeathWalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sam DeathWalker RoXoRs yur BoXoRs!
Posts: 760
+50 Internets
Meth does bad things to peeps, mmka.

Its not Meth or Coke.
__________________

Sam DeathWalker is offline  
Old 07-12-2009, 11:52 PM   #2230 (permalink)
Mario Speedwagon
Registered User
 
Mario Speedwagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: 3rd Place
Posts: 2,121
-47 Internets
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam DeathWalker View Post
Keep in mind that she signed the documnets saying her rights were violated BOTH before she was 18 AND after she was 18.
I'm sure you paid her to do that too. Tell me, was she still an addict at the time of singing this, presumably authored by you and unread by her, document?
Mario Speedwagon is offline  
Old 07-12-2009, 11:53 PM   #2231 (permalink)
Screamfeeder
I MAEK ART!!
 
Screamfeeder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,930
+169 Internets
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam DeathWalker View Post
Puberty ends at 18, just when adulthood starts, is that what you are saying? For Females or Males?
No. What I'm saying is that a 15 year old human being does not possess the cognitive ability to make choices that have long-term effects on their life, especially ones dealing with emotional trauma.

Leave your bullshit, sophomoric theory crafting for the WoW nerds to tear apart.
Screamfeeder is offline  
Old 07-12-2009, 11:57 PM   #2232 (permalink)
Sam DeathWalker
Registered User
 
Sam DeathWalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sam DeathWalker RoXoRs yur BoXoRs!
Posts: 760
+50 Internets
Ok the correct term is addolecent:

A 15 year old is not a child but an addolecent.

Adolescent sexuality - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
__________________

Sam DeathWalker is offline  
Old 07-13-2009, 12:00 AM   #2233 (permalink)
Screamfeeder
I MAEK ART!!
 
Screamfeeder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,930
+169 Internets
No. Because an adolescent hasn't FINISHED their childhood cognitive abilities. Even if they did, it's bullshit semantics. Can I justify having sex with a 5 year old just because they might be labeled a "senior"? No.

And stop fucking complimenting me. It's fucking creepy. You ARE a slimy, degenerate, pedo fuck with 0 redeeming value other than serving as a warning the entire rest of the Human species about "What Not To Be".
Screamfeeder is offline  
Old 07-13-2009, 12:00 AM   #2234 (permalink)
Goanad
Registered User
 
Goanad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Iraq
Posts: 238
-13 Internets
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam DeathWalker View Post
Ok the correct term is addolecent:

A 15 year old is not a child but an addolecent.

Adolescent sexuality - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I bet you really identified with Michael Jackson?
Goanad is offline  
Old 07-13-2009, 12:02 AM   #2235 (permalink)
Sam DeathWalker
Registered User
 
Sam DeathWalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sam DeathWalker RoXoRs yur BoXoRs!
Posts: 760
+50 Internets
What I'm saying is that a 15 year old human being does not possess the cognitive ability to make choices that have long-term effects on their life, especially ones dealing with emotional trauma.

I agree they stress short term advantage over long term advantage. And your point is?

As stated in my case the female gained short term rewards without the long term disadvantages of pregnacy or STD.

Why because even though she wasn't thinking long term, I was.


I am responding to your claim I had sex with a child the correct statement is

"You had sex with an addolencent".
__________________

Sam DeathWalker is offline  
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

uberguilds network



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6