|
|
Or, use your gamerDNA username: (more...)
| ||||||
| |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1756 (permalink) |
| Hard Rock Hallelujah Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,626
| I don't know what the fuck you are quoting there because it is in no way from our penal code § 182 StGB Sexueller Mißbrauch von Jugendlichen anyone who even had a year of highschool German should be able to verify this. |
| |
| | #1757 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Sam DeathWalker RoXoRs yur BoXoRs!
Posts: 760
+50 Internets | I dont know why you keep saying that: Ages of consent in North America - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia During the 19th century, the age of consent for heterosexual vaginal sex was 12, in 1890, the Parliament raised the age of consent to 14. [2] The punishment for anyone who had sexual intercourse with a child younger than 14 was life imprisonment and whipping, while the punishment for anyone who only attempted to seduce an underage girl was two years' imprisonment and whipping.[3] Canada had also laws against "seducing" minor girls who were over the age of consent. In 1886, a law was enacted which made the "seduction" of a girl over 12 and under 16 "of previously chaste character" a criminal offence; the "seduction" of a female under 18 "under promise of marriage" was also made illegal in 1886, and amended in 1887 to apply to females under 21. [4] After the raising of the age of consent to 14, the laws against "seducing" minor girls were amended to apply to those older than 14, and various laws of this kind have remained in force through the 20th century. [5] The age of consent was raised from 14 to 16 in the spring of 2008, when the Tackling Violent Crime Act became effective. The age of consent for anal sex still remains 18 under section 159, and the new measures still allow for close in age exceptions between 12 and 16: if there is no more than a two year gap for those 12 and 13, or a five year gap for those 14 and 15. Female homosexuality was never illegal in the former British colonies; oral sex was legalized in 1969 with the same age of consent as vaginal sex and anal sex was also legalized in 1969, but with a higher age of consent being set at 21, under section 159; then in 1988 the age of consent for anal sex was lowered to 18. As of 2008 there are no plans to repeal section 159, even though it has been ruled unconstitutional in some places of Canada. laws against "seducing" minor girls were amended to apply to those older than 14, and various laws of this kind have remained in force through the 20th century In Ottwa its STILL 14: Sexual Offences Laws - Canada And why argue without posting links; you don't know how to use google? |
| |
| | #1760 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Sam DeathWalker RoXoRs yur BoXoRs!
Posts: 760
+50 Internets | http://www.interpol.int/Public/Child...CsaGermany.pdf I can't read German; according to interpol its 14 in Germany during Spring of 2006. |
| |
| | #1761 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Sam DeathWalker RoXoRs yur BoXoRs!
Posts: 760
+50 Internets | Lol first its pregancy prevention, then aids, then "protection of the stupid" now its prostution. Once you get away from the resonable Pregnacy and STD prevention and move on to morality or prostitution arugments its just clear that these laws are to benifit not the minor but to allow one group of conservities an excuse to use violence against others by force of law. The laws are a joke and not to the benifit of the minor. Again If I was 15 and had sex with a hot 30 year old MILTF and got PAID for it how is that harmfull to me. LOL. |
| |
| | #1762 (permalink) |
| Hard Rock Hallelujah Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,626
| What, too stupid to google for a translator? It's 14 but only if a) you don't fucking pay for it b) exploit their situation you did both in one BJ. You first tried to reduce a whole paragraph to a single line that might apply to you while all the other parts apply to you without the shadow of a doubt. Even if she were not a junkie and you hadn't payed for it, you still could get convicted and thrown into prison for 3 years if the judge were convinced that you, as you already quoted, exploited the victim's lack of capacity for sexual self-determination. So there is absolutly no way you could stick your 21+ year old dick into a 15 year old girl here and be on the safe side 100%. §182 (3) might come around and kick your ass, except that in your case (1) and (2) already do that. |
| |
| | #1763 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Sam DeathWalker RoXoRs yur BoXoRs!
Posts: 760
+50 Internets | Let me think for second... is it better for me to have sex or to have sex AND get PAID for it. Humm. Ummm. Hummm. Ummm. LOL. How can soar like an Eagle when I spend all day talking to Turkeys? |
| |
| | #1764 (permalink) | |
| Hard Rock Hallelujah Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,626
| Quote:
Paying for sex is the very definition of prostitution and is in no way allowed in any of the western country you've labeled as pedo-safe-havens earlier in this thread. | |
| |
| | #1766 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Sam DeathWalker RoXoRs yur BoXoRs!
Posts: 760
+50 Internets | and then you used the money on crack and ODed ... Im not advocation the use of drugs or changing drug laws. You can die in a car accident on your way to church; whats your point? |
| |
| | #1767 (permalink) |
| Hard Rock Hallelujah Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,626
| Run it through a translator, I've already explained it in here and linked it in German. Amusing you thought you could declare Germany to be in line with your sick ideas when you didn't do the research you claim to always do. |
| |
| | #1770 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Sam DeathWalker RoXoRs yur BoXoRs!
Posts: 760
+50 Internets | Section 182 Sexual Abuse of Youths (1) A person over eighteen years of age who abuses a person under sixteen years of age, in that he: 1. commits sexual acts on the person by exploiting a coercive situation or for compensation, or allows them to be committed on himself by the person; or 2. by exploiting a coercive situation induces the person to commit sexual acts on a third person or to allow them to be committed on the person by a third person, shall be punished with imprisonment for not more than five years or a fine. (2) A person over twenty-one years of age who abuses a person under sixteen years of age, in that he: 1. commits sexual acts on the person or allows them to be committed on himself by the person; or 2. induces the person to commit sexual acts on a third person or to allow them to be committed on the person by a third person, and thereby exploits the victim’s lack of capacity for sexual selfdetermination, shall be punished with imprisonment for not more than three years or a fine. (3) In cases under subsection (2) the act shall only be prosecuted upon complaint, unless the prosecuting authority considers ex officio that it is required to enter the case because of the special public interest therein. (4) In cases under subsections (1) and (2) the court may dispense with punishment pursuant to these provisions if , in consideration of the conduct of the person against whom the act was directed, the wrongfulness of the act is slight. CHAPTER EIGHTEEN Ya OK ill give you that under 16 payment would result in a crime. |
| |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |