Chrono Trigger DS? - Page 4

Kobalt · 07-02-2008, 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blank

enter FF6 vrs CT debate.

(ff6 wins btw)

xenogears is better then both

"ducks"

Dumar · 07-02-2008, 05:11 PM

can't wait to play this. finally a rehash that's a real rehash. not 3d ugly bullshit.

btw, there is a pecking order. ffvi >= ffiv >= ct > xenogears > tactics >> ffvii >>> rest

Cadrid · 07-02-2008, 05:54 PM

I now have the song when you're first flying the Epoch playing over and over in my head.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tuco

Never played Chrono-Trigger btw.

No wonder you're such a crappy mod.

(I kid!)

sticktastic · 07-02-2008, 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Dauntless One

Its nice Nintendo is re-releasing old games and all but this is getting ridiculous.

Before this was announced they had commented on speculation, and said "if there was enough demand" they would do this. Why are you saying its getting ridiculous for a company to use todays technology to improve on a already solid and proven game? Considering how many games and game companies fail now days, I think this is great news. If more games didnt blow donkey dick, and more game companies kept there promises there would probably not be a high enough demand for this type of thing as often as we are seeing it. Gamers are craving good solid, working entertaining games. Sadly those are few and far between now days it seems.

Your opinion is obviously your entitlement, but dont call something ridiculous that has actually already proven itself to work, without all the false hopes of games being released now.

Alamando · 07-02-2008, 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blank

enter FF6 vrs CT debate.

(ff6 wins btw)

A man offers you to choose one of two briefcases. One briefcase has a million dollars. The other has a million and one dollars. Both choices are win.

I have the PS remake (And the old cartridge...somewhere) and I will still probably buy this. Damn.

Blank · 07-02-2008, 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alamando

A man offers you to choose one of two briefcases. One briefcase has a million dollars. The other has a million and one dollars. Both choices are win.

I have the PS remake (And the old cartridge...somewhere) and I will still probably buy this. Damn.

But the million and one dollar briefcase is FF6, right?

Cybsled · 07-02-2008, 06:48 PM

The FF6 briefcase is a million and one dollars until World of Ruin...then you discover 1/4th of the money is really Monopoly dollars.

Sythrak · 07-02-2008, 06:54 PM

If you've played and beaten this already, I see no point in spending money on a port with 1 extra dungeon heh. Emulators have pretty much ruined any of the direct port to a new system type money grabbing (thank god).

That Chrono remake though looked pretty good, too bad.

Dumar · 07-02-2008, 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sythrak

If you've played and beaten this already, I see no point in spending money on a port with 1 extra dungeon heh. Emulators have pretty much ruined any of the direct port to a new system type money grabbing (thank god).

That Chrono remake though looked pretty good, too bad.

money grabbing? you call this money grabbing? do you play video games? do you know what the electronic gaming industry is?

Kobalt · 07-02-2008, 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dumar

money grabbing? you call this money grabbing? do you play video games? do you know what the electronic gaming industry is?

That thar is alot of question marks.

Wombat · 07-02-2008, 08:25 PM

The FF6 vs. CT debate is one that will rage forever; the main complaint against CT is the short length.

Is 1 ounce of the best steak ever better than 5 ounces of the second best steak ever? Most would say no, and thus FF6 wins.

And yes, I will probably end up paying for this, despite doing enough New Game+ shenanigans to completely max out my chars in the SNES version and maxing out half the party in the PS1 version. (Not that tab farming was all that hard - throw berserker items on the party and the first time combat actually involves a button press is when you have to run away from oozes in 2300 AD.)

Ahnkosis · 07-02-2008, 08:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Needless

heh, not at all.
its just nice to know i have some games that are still worth value, not that id ever plan on selling it ever =p

I used to think that way. Then I put all my shit for sale on Ebay. Cashing in $100+ per Sega Saturn game and $75+ per Square PS1 game = win.

With the widespread availability of Emulators and Roms, along with the repackaging and reselling of old games (XBLA, Virtual Console, regular Consoles, etc), I don't expect the value to keep increasing. It might, but I wouldn't stake money on it...especially when there's hardly enough time to play new games, let alone revisit a bunch of old games in nostalgia.

gavinrad · 07-02-2008, 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wombat

The FF6 vs. CT debate is one that will rage forever; the main complaint against CT is the short length.

Is 1 ounce of the best steak ever better than 5 ounces of the second best steak ever? Most would say no, and thus FF6 wins.

And yes, I will probably end up paying for this, despite doing enough New Game+ shenanigans to completely max out my chars in the SNES version and maxing out half the party in the PS1 version. (Not that tab farming was all that hard - throw berserker items on the party and the first time combat actually involves a button press is when you have to run away from oozes in 2300 AD.)

Uh...pretty shitty analogy when you leave out the fact that you can regurgitate the 1 ounce steak, eat it again and again and again and again, and it still tastes better than the 5 ounce steak each time.

Of course, FF4 is better than CT or FF6, so its a moot point.

owakefka · 07-02-2008, 09:02 PM

I'm definitely getting a DS now.

Adam12 · 07-02-2008, 09:21 PM

I got hard just seeing the thread title. Between FF3/FF4 remakes, and now Chrono, I can't see how any SNES RPG fan would be disappointed with the DS.

07-02-2008, 06:48 PM	#52 (permalink)
Cybsled Registered User Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 10,284 +49 Internets	The FF6 briefcase is a million and one dollars until World of Ruin...then you discover 1/4th of the money is really Monopoly dollars. __________________ Training the citizens of Norrath from 1999-2003!

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

07-02-2008, 06:54 PM	#53 (permalink)
Sythrak Registered User Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 183	If you've played and beaten this already, I see no point in spending money on a port with 1 extra dungeon heh. Emulators have pretty much ruined any of the direct port to a new system type money grabbing (thank god). That Chrono remake though looked pretty good, too bad.

07-02-2008, 08:25 PM	#56 (permalink)
Wombat Registered User Join Date: Apr 2002 Posts: 675 +0 Internets	The FF6 vs. CT debate is one that will rage forever; the main complaint against CT is the short length. Is 1 ounce of the best steak ever better than 5 ounces of the second best steak ever? Most would say no, and thus FF6 wins. And yes, I will probably end up paying for this, despite doing enough New Game+ shenanigans to completely max out my chars in the SNES version and maxing out half the party in the PS1 version. (Not that tab farming was all that hard - throw berserker items on the party and the first time combat actually involves a button press is when you have to run away from oozes in 2300 AD.)

07-02-2008, 09:02 PM	#59 (permalink)
owakefka The Next Pirate King Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: AZ Posts: 77 -18 Internets	I'm definitely getting a DS now.

07-02-2008, 09:21 PM	#60 (permalink)
Adam12 Hobophobic Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Austin, TX Posts: 2,295 +26 Internets	I got hard just seeing the thread title. Between FF3/FF4 remakes, and now Chrono, I can't see how any SNES RPG fan would be disappointed with the DS.