fohguild.org / uberguilds game ratings - Page 4

Jadaki · 12-10-2007, 03:00 PM

As far as weighted scoring, you could put in a requirement that would cut out shills. Something like 500 posts and 1 year on the site as a registered user with no temp bans from mods. I imagine thats a lot of work for a shill to go through and weird posting habits wouldn't be hard to notice.

Algol Devilstar · 12-10-2007, 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kolle

can we get some kind of anti-shill rules put into place if there's a vote on each game? i dunno, maybe weighted voting based on length of foh board membership or something

I look on some sites that have places for comments on games. It's painfully obvious that shills sign up and right some stupid ass ridiculous shit that can't possibly come out of the mouth of a real person.

"This title is stellar! It reminds me of what being a gamer is all about. The audio and visuals are of high quality. If sony gave me more money I'd have a few extra things to say."

Actually here's a comment from a game on gamestop:

"Stunning!

Wow! This is the first game I bought for my PS3 and it is phenominal! The gameplay is engaging, The graphics...amazing! You have freedom, the world is gigantic and there is just so much to do. I can see playing this game even long after I have beaten it just for the side missions and adventure. I am also a history buff so the story setting is quite a nice change of pace and very original. This is a must have!"

so what games is that? I can't tell by the quote.

RiskyChris · 12-10-2007, 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kolle

can we get some kind of anti-shill rules put into place if there's a vote on each game? i dunno, maybe weighted voting based on length of foh board membership or something

Rock Band 11/10 (GET IT LOLLOL) A+++++++++ Would buy again! Perfect!

TKarrde · 12-10-2007, 09:57 PM

I think the audience that would be using/viewing it is quite a bit different than that of gamefaqs, though.

That has to count for something.

Faille · 12-23-2007, 07:02 AM

Would making use of a wiki suit what people are wanting?

Jadaki · 12-24-2007, 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Faille

Would making use of a wiki suit what people are wanting?

Based on my experience with Wikimedia software I'd say no. You would be better of building something from scratch.

Hatorade · 12-24-2007, 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jadaki

Based on my experience with Wikimedia software I'd say no. You would be better of building something from scratch.

I would be all over this if I knew how. I seriously could dedicate A LOT of time to keeping it up to date and all that. Seeing as how I am looking at these boards for at least 10 hours a day anyhow.

12-23-2007, 07:02 AM	#50 (permalink)
Faille Fires of Heaven Officer Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Melbourne, Australia Posts: 2,685 +13 Internets	Would making use of a wiki suit what people are wanting? __________________ Faille Fires of Heaven http://www.fohguild.org/forums/uberw...lopment-forum/

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

12-10-2007, 03:00 PM	#46 (permalink)
Jadaki This space for rent! Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 1,256 -3 Internets	As far as weighted scoring, you could put in a requirement that would cut out shills. Something like 500 posts and 1 year on the site as a registered user with no temp bans from mods. I imagine thats a lot of work for a shill to go through and weird posting habits wouldn't be hard to notice.

12-10-2007, 09:57 PM	#49 (permalink)
TKarrde Beebop a loubop awhapshamboo and domo arigatou if I got to Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 665	I think the audience that would be using/viewing it is quite a bit different than that of gamefaqs, though. That has to count for something.