|
|
Or, use your gamerDNA username: (more...)
| ||||||
| |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 78
| Warriors and 2 hand bash... Now I don’t play a Warrior and don’t wish to, but I was wondering why Warrior’s don’t get 2 hand bash AA skill? I mean Paladins and SKs do, which Warrior is one of their parent classes. Yes I understand why Paladins/SKs get the skill for lack of kick and only having double attack makes them to use 2 handers for greatest DPS. Warriors do mainly dual wield for aggro management/DPS (especially main tanks). But some warriors actually do use 2 handers. After level 55 warrior kick has a stun component to it, but I was under the impression that in order for the kick to interrupt spells you had to stun them (which doesn’t happen everytime). Where with bash/slam (for large races) as long as you connected with it you would always interrupt spells even if you didn’t stun them. Is this wrong information? If it is true is there any reason why warriors shouldn’t get this ability? Or is it not that big of a deal and kick works fine? Once again thanks for your time and input. |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) | |
| Rar. Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Toronto
Posts: 74
| Re: Warriors and 2 hand bash... Quote:
__________________ Yeah, I still play FFXI. So? | |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |