|
|
Or, use your gamerDNA username: (more...)
| ||||||
| |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #31 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30
| Been down there with a full raid all the way to the bottom. No one has complained of Framerate problems. So, next you're gonna tell me this one server must be buggy if we're not having the same problem? Seriously, worst problems in PoW would be the wall porting and the occasional bug. Maybe there's a reason your having probs. I'm on an Athlon 1400 with a GeForce3 and don't have this framerate problem. Take a SS..maybe there's a reason? I R Insane |
| |
| | #32 (permalink) |
| Banned Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 38
| It's odd how some people are saying they have zero lag, while others say it's horrible. Makes you wonder what the cause of the problem is.. I know every single person in FoH has at least some problems with framerate deep in that zone. It's interesting too, as Jaytee noted, a few times all the people would disappear for a few seconds (I thought I took a wrong turn or was going LD - neither was the case), then the lag would clear up 100%, and then they would all reappear along with the lag. Very odd indeed. Furor tells the guild, "WHY ARE YOU GOING PAST ME? AM I INVISIBLE?" |
| |
| | #33 (permalink) |
| Maddox rules. Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 45
| i know its an obvious suggestion and im not trying to insult anyone by suggesting it, but what the hell. make sure datarate is set to 9 rather than the default of 6. took me 2 years to hear of that. never had a problem with framerates again. |
| |
| | #35 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 14
| Quote:
Dual processors helps with ANY applications, just not nearly as much as if the application was written for dual processors. You know all those API calls that EQ makes to the OS? And all the operating system threads that manage memory, process scheduling etc? those threads need a CPU to run on also. The 20-30% second cpu usage was OS level thread execution in response to EQ's system resource usage. This leaves the other processor mainly free to process EQ related stuff. So STFUp fucking moron. | |
| |
| | #38 (permalink) |
| Maddox rules. Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 45
| ya i dont think it should either but to my dismay on a 10th ring war which i previously and honestly had about 2 fps, i logged back in to a completely smooth game. but ya you are correct that it did solve my spell casting problems which was the main reason i changed it. |
| |
| | #39 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,250
| Quote:
Oh, and by the way: http://www.tomshardware.com/mainboar...athlon-05.html yeah, wow, 20%-30% increase huh? Obviously you think you know alot more about computers than you really do. Last edited by Lefazz : 01-14-2003 at 12:15 PM. | |
| |
| | #40 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 12
| Benchmarks are soooooo irrelevant to actual performance, unless properly designed. Only someone with no actual knowledge of engineering would cite benchmarks to back up their statements. I don't see what the Tom's Hardware link is supposed to tell us either, other than that dual processors work better in some applications than others. And all of it is irrelevant to the particular matter at hand, which is that PoWater sucks for reasons completely unrelated to processor speed, network performance, video card performance, or phallus size of the player. It may be related to the clip plane or how good a hair day someone at SOE is having, but either way, it sucks. Fix what is now a nearly unplayable zone, please. |
| |
| | #41 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2
| hmmm... I am one of those crazy kids that have been everywhere in the zone with a full raid and no FPS issues. I have a p4 2.25 , 512mb , XP, Geforce3. UseUmbra=True I have Umbra turned on in the eqclient.ini which if I remember correctly is the new engine code they implmented with luclin to "help" the client not draw polys that are not in your field of vision. I also remember a thread somewhere mentioning that umbra never worked to well on amd processors. So, is anyone with a p4 and umbra on having these fps issues? Sounds to me that it could be an amd issue, umbra issue or both combined. Last edited by Amidgit : 01-14-2003 at 12:55 PM. |
| |
| | #42 (permalink) | |
| You mean I can change this? Neat! Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,226
+38 Internets | Quote:
Also, my cock is larger than yours, so nyea. Oh, and about Umbra, I don't think it ever worked, or if it did, it didn't do a fucking thing. Either that or maybe there is a problem with it and AMD proc's (that's what I run). How do I know that? Ssra of course! If Umbra really was doing something to remove unseen geometry, Ssra should have had silky smooth frame rates for the most part. However the only time that I ever found frame rates to be halfway decent was when I was staring at a wall on the zone edge. Otherwise if I was staring at a wall facing into the zone, the frame rate would still be shitty, cause all the shit behind it within the clip plane was still being drawn. So either Umbra doesn't work period, or it's buggy as shit. Last edited by Eomer : 01-14-2003 at 12:51 PM. | |
| |
| | #43 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 14
| Quote:
I said the 20%-30% cpu usage was OS level threads, I did not say it gave a 20-30% improvement to speed. Second of all I'm not using either of those boards, so don't point me to some stupid single app tomshardware guide stats that don't mean dick for my system. Also I'm using windows XP professional, not windows 2000. How about you get SOE to implement a FPS counter in game and then I can reboot using single cpu and compare to dual CPU, that's about the only fucking way you can have ANY input into this topic. Since I HAVE the system and know how it performs. bitch and whine all you want about how you know everything and how dual cpu sucks. But I get ZERO lag with all settings maxed running in 1024x768 and get what seems like 40-60FPS + in 60+ person raids. This is the only zone I've EVER encountered that absolutely killed my framerate. So go back to hunting dervs and pulling on your pecker. | |
| |
| | #44 (permalink) |
| Fires of Heaven Officer Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Washington
Posts: 5,193
+17 Internets | P4 1.7, 1 gig of Ram, GeForce 3 - my FPS is pure shit down there and I only have 3 models on. You people who are saying you've had zero problems with framerate deep in the zone are FULL OF SHIT. Our ENTIRE guild has Framerate problems in that piece of shit zone and some of those people have computers almost twice as good as mine is. The zone is a piece of crap. Almost all zones are pieces of crap. Whoever builds the zones is a no-talent-assclown who needs to learn a few things. For how EQ looks, the piece of shit shouldn't be having any problems on my computer, and the fact that people with GF4's and Raedon 9700s are having problem is absolutely ridiculous. Clean up your god damned antiquated code and learn how to build zones that don't make computers grind to a halt. |
| |
| | #45 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30
| Quote:
The more ppl that post having no problems while you sit there bitching and moaning the less credible you become. Check your buffs and all sorts of other shit before you come calling everyone liars. Obviously there's a difference that's not hardware or server related. Coding you say? Hmmm? Since I'm not having the framerate problem maybe you're full of shit? Nah, there is a problem, on your end. Back to the pt. It's not system related. So what else haven't you checked? I R | |
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |