|
|
Or, use your gamerDNA username: (more...)
| ||||||
| |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #32 (permalink) |
| Slightly OP Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,137
+38 Internets | People whined about the TCG stuff at first too. As long as its only cosmetic, I really don't mind. Just keep it all outside of the game, please. Screenshots like that one above of EQ2 are gross. I don't want an in-game thing popping up asking me to buy something. |
| | |
| | #33 (permalink) |
| The Mexicant Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,147
+10 Internets | Honestly, I can see how most people are weary of this kind of thing beginning in WoW and MMOs in general. But, I have to ask...if it eventually turns into pay X for tier Y, I fail to see how it effects the majority of the player base. The only people I could see being a problem is if they started charging for special abilities, more glyph slots, and stuff that buffs a character beyond what is currently in game. PvP sets would have to be restricted, but PvE? I don't see the harm in allowing John Doe Moneybags buy a full set of Tier 9 for 5 bucks a slot. Sure, guilds might end up requiring you to have it if its available but then no one is forcing you to join a guild like that. If anything it would squash the ridiculous "gear checking" shit that has run rampant since the introduction of the addon/sites to the masses. Who knows you may have to actually see if a person is qualified beyond what their gear level may indicate. The slippery slope argument is always a fun one to witness in MMOs when stuff is introduced. |
| | |
| | #34 (permalink) |
| Smilin for Jesus Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 342
| How would it squash gear checking? Are you fucking stupid? It would mean that instead of hitting 80 and working your ass off instancing and all that you shell out 100 bucks for gear. It would completely destroy their own game. It doesn't even make sense for them to sell gear. The whole business is built on farming gear and bullshitting and if you remove one side the other doesn't exist.
__________________ |
| | |
| | #35 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 592
| What if you have zero interest in cosmetic fluff but you have a Wife/Kids playing that AW COME ON DAD, I JUST GOTTA HAVE THAT CUTE PANDA!!! PLEAAAASEEEE As said before, not only is this a slippery slope, but cosmetics ARE a part of online gaming, and withholding certain rewards for only those willing to pay extra is IMO, wrong. I didn't realize marketplace was available on all EQ2 servers, I never used it when I played but I did play LDON quite a bit. (never got anything useful to use in game, but did get things in game to use for LDON) I guess my main point is, even if the marketplace has not adversely affected EQ2s subscription numbers, we are talking about a vastly smaller population in the first place. If Blizzard went all out and offered their own marketplace they would be taking a MUCH larger gamble than Sony. And there is harm for allowing people to get equivalent levels of power and achievement by allowing people to just buy their way in...first, these people are generally going to be unqualified to play up to the level of their gear and content progression, and second it belittles the time and effort that other people put into obtaining said gear. Queue the "I only play to see the content" people, because of course no cool people care about the way their character looks compared to everyone else. I guess I'm shallow, I used to be pretty impressed when I saw someone in Vanilla rocking full tier 3 or with a Thunderfury. |
| | |
| | #37 (permalink) | |
| King of the Internets Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Mission, Kansas
Posts: 2,393
+227 Internets | Quote:
Another thing, with regards to WoW - we know another Blizz MMO is on the way, and WoW might very well be close to seeing the inevitable decline in subs. People who are on the fence will eventually leeave, that's a given. If they're already close to leaving, micros will drive them away, but on the other side of the coin, if you are going to lose them as subs anyways and the remaining players won't balk, then why not go to microtransactions? I'll tell you right now, that WoW will have players that will continue to play it LONG past it's prime, just like people stayed with DaoC, AC or EQ, and those players are less likely (almost guaranteed) to take microtransactions in stride and continue playing. Now I know that I'm in the minority, if we consider gamers in general and not just the people from forums here (and even them, possibly the minority). That's one reason why I'm leery about it, is because so many people are going to poo-poo it, and say they are ok with it as long as it doesn't have an in-game effect amitire?, that imo that could very well signal to Devs everywhere that we're on the cusp of some sort of microtransaction sea change. Last edited by Erronius; 11-05-2009 at 12:52 PM.. | |
| | |
| | #38 (permalink) | |
| There is no internets Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,175
+1 Internets | Quote:
I just worry that with pay to play, box sells, XBOX Live service, paying a premium for storage space, this is just another way to squeeze my ever decreasing entertainment budget. /shrug I am sure gamers will survive one way or another, just doesnt seem like the path I was hoping we would go down.
__________________ Not a spelling nazi Definitions of LOSE on the Web: fail to keep or to maintain; cease to have, either physically or in an abstract sense; "She lost her purse when she left it unattended on her seat" Definitions of LOOSE on the Web: not restrained or confined or attached; "a pocket full of loose bills"; "knocked the ball loose"; "got loose from his attacker" For EP: | |
| | |
| | #39 (permalink) | |
| Extremely Busy DPS Provider Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,467
| Quote:
__________________ http://nyxs.mybrute.com Laress Sansoul - Gallente Futa Roleplayer, Tranquility PM me your email address for EVE 21 day trial accounts. | |
| | |
| | #41 (permalink) |
| Plugged In Like Neo | The thread title alone is frustrating here. You're a business interested in making money...does the word "enough" ever mean anything to you? Why would 3 or 5 or 10 ways of making money ever be enough? Blizzard have smart marketing. They're going to monopolize on any opportunity they can, and continue to rake in outrageous amounts of cash. Have you seen many of these pets on your server? I know I certainly have already. They are going to make plenty of cash on this, and they will surely start selling cosmetic gear, holdables, etc. You're all going to complain and be sad about it, but you'll keep playing. And people will buy the shit out of these items. |
| | |
| | #42 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: May 2006 Location: North Carolina
Posts: 431
| I don't necessarily agree with it either but it's not like they are going to lost a ton of subs over it. People are going to whine and cry about it for a month (or less) then it'll be forgotten. Meanwhile Blizzard will probably make a killing to compensate for any lost subs. Welcome to business 101. |
| | |
| | #43 (permalink) |
| You are just another normal! Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,384
| Blast from the past? Bobby Kotick is such a goddamn pimp.
__________________ Like a ship without an anchor, like a slave without a chain, just the thought of those sweet ladies sends a shiver through my veins. And I will go on shining, shining like brand new. I'll never look behind me, my troubles will be few. Goodbye stranger, it's been nice. Hope you find your paradise. Tried to see your point of view, hope your dreams will all come true. Goodbye Mary, goodbye Jane, will we ever meet again? Feel no sorrow, feel no shame. Come tomorrow, feel no pain. |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |