Fires of Heaven Guild Message Board  

Go Back   Fires of Heaven Guild Message Board > Fires of Heaven Related Forums > MMORPG General Discussion
User Name
Password
Or, use your gamerDNA username: (more...)
ForumSpy Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 04-14-2009, 06:18 PM   #196 (permalink)
Plorkyeran
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 720
-2 Internets
Quote:
Originally Posted by Araxen View Post
Blizz forced all mods to be open source with their new policy. You have to show your code. They can do what they want.
No, they didn't. Being able to see the unobfuscated source code to something does not give you permission to do actually anything with that source code.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ao- View Post
Didn't they do that with several mods? SCT, Advanced Macros, some other ones... etc.
No. Copying the functionality of an addon is not at all the same thing as copying and pasting the code.
Plorkyeran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2009, 06:22 PM   #197 (permalink)
Mist
Extremely Busy DPS Provider
 
Mist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,464
-103 Internets
Quote:
Originally Posted by Qhue View Post
I know they dont have the same exact set up for all their servers... however with the sheer volume of cash they rake in they COULD have the exact same setup for every server. Then it would simply be a matter of perfecting the deployment on their internal test cluster and replicating that X times throughout the server farms.

Either their whole network structure is a spaghetti mess that has completely unpredictable behavior, or they are pretty darn bad at doing their job. I would have to imagine that its the former and not the latter, but this wont even remotely effect their bottom line so there is zero impetus to do this well.

They could have all the servers down for a few days and not see a single lost subscriber.
I imagine the problem is backing up and converting the databases to each new version, not actually deploying the code to the world servers. Each patch must make major structural changes to how world, item and character data is stored.
__________________
http://nyxs.mybrute.com
Laress Sansoul - Gallente Futa Roleplayer, Tranquility
PM me your email address for EVE 21 day trial accounts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cadrid View Post
From all the pointless whining and fuming over a non-issue like the WAR ad, I think Tampax should post an ad there once Mythic's contract expires.
Mist is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2009, 06:25 PM   #198 (permalink)
Nehrak
It just don't mean a thing.
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 1,118
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mist View Post
I imagine the problem is backing up and converting the databases to each new version, not actually deploying the code to the world servers. Each patch must make major structural changes to how world, item and character data is stored.
I wouldn't say that for every patch, but major ones, sure. Expansion patches, this one (dual spec alone is enough; it changes the pfile size a bit)... things like that where player or NPC data gets a size adjustment.

But I do agree it's probably the databases and char files acting up for whatever reason.
Nehrak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2009, 06:37 PM   #199 (permalink)
Tuco
Forum Janitor
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Detroit
Posts: 10,721
+75 Internets
Send a message via AIM to Tuco
Quote:
Originally Posted by Plorkyeran View Post
No, they didn't. Being able to see the unobfuscated source code to something does not give you permission to do actually anything with that source code.


No. Copying the functionality of an addon is not at all the same thing as copying and pasting the code.
I doubt they would copy/paste the code anyway. Their quality process wouldn't allow it and by the time they conformed the UI code and tested it, it'd look quite different. Different enough to avoid legal trouble from some guy who wrote some xml/lua for a game owned by the offending party? Probably.
Tuco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2009, 07:14 PM   #200 (permalink)
Cad
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dallas
Posts: 6,674
-37 Internets
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xequecal View Post
No they don't. I'm not exactly sure where the line is drawn, but Blizzard most certainly could not just, for example, take a popular mod, copy the LUA code line for line and integrate it into the base UI without the author's permission.
Mods would most likely be classified derivative works, yes Blizzard would in that case own the copyright. They absolutely could copy it line for line into the base UI.
Cad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2009, 07:15 PM   #201 (permalink)
Kreugen
Fires of Heaven Ancient
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,137
+71 Internets
If they had cockblocked wowmatrix back when the curse updater was a steaming pile of shit I'd be annoyed, but the curse client is pretty nice now and I'm glad for the switch.
Kreugen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2009, 07:21 PM   #202 (permalink)
equobix
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 158
-13 Internets
do not merge any of your accounts.

Im pretty sure battle.net accounts were made to prevent people from "cashing out" of wow and selling all their stuff to play diablo 3 and starcraft two. If you merge your shit if you ever want to sell your toon you'd also be selling your starcraft and diablo shit with it.
equobix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2009, 07:25 PM   #203 (permalink)
Araxen
A Bearded Gnome
 
Araxen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Near Chicago, IL
Posts: 4,915
Send a message via ICQ to Araxen Send a message via AIM to Araxen
duh
__________________
PSN: Araxen
http://www.last.fm/user/araxen

The Best FAQ on the Internet: The Official God FAQ
Araxen is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2009, 07:29 PM   #204 (permalink)
Plorkyeran
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 720
-2 Internets
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cad View Post
Mods would most likely be classified derivative works, yes Blizzard would in that case own the copyright. They absolutely could copy it line for line into the base UI.
Unless the mod uses code from the base UI (which a decent number of them do, although far fewer than there were a few years ago), there's nothing about them that makes them derivative works. That's also not how derivative works work; the original copyright holder doesn't magically gain ownership of the new material created.
Plorkyeran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2009, 08:09 PM   #205 (permalink)
Sharmai
None of you will disagree so I will.
 
Sharmai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,936
WTF happen to the shaman totem change that was going to combine healing + mana totems?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Requiem View Post
I'd elaborate on what I said since you obviously took it wrong, but I don't believe that you're stupid enough to not get what I was saying. The very next sentence qualifies the statement.

I see now. You're one of those people that looks for reasons to be offended. It must be frustrating to go through life like that.
Sharmai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2009, 08:30 PM   #206 (permalink)
CyrusReij
I <3 Cats
 
CyrusReij's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,250
Lolol, so I walked into H Gundrak, and on the first pull, the instance freezes, cant zone out, cant cast, cant logout etc. I Alt F4d only now my character has no zone, and when it goes to load Gundrak, it loads the bar, then sits there ad infinitum, yay being cockblocked out when I'm just trying to run Heroics :\
CyrusReij is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2009, 08:49 PM   #207 (permalink)
syeren
Registered User
 
syeren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 118
-18 Internets
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharmai View Post
WTF happen to the shaman totem change that was going to combine healing + mana totems?
Not happening.

Basically Blizzard said they were going to do a bunch of shit for Shamans like usual, and then failed to deliver on 99% of them, like usual.

An example would be that the big thing about 3.1 was that they were going to fix 'Totem stomping' macros, but they bailed on that.
syeren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2009, 08:55 PM   #208 (permalink)
Sharmai
None of you will disagree so I will.
 
Sharmai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,936
Stoneclaw totem does some kind of totem protecting thing. Was that there before? That might be what they meant. As the server just went down I don't have a chance to test it.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Requiem View Post
I'd elaborate on what I said since you obviously took it wrong, but I don't believe that you're stupid enough to not get what I was saying. The very next sentence qualifies the statement.

I see now. You're one of those people that looks for reasons to be offended. It must be frustrating to go through life like that.
Sharmai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2009, 08:59 PM   #209 (permalink)
Vinen
Open the eyes
 
Vinen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Not in fucking Acton, MA anymore!
Posts: 4,257
So nice. Some servers fucked some not.. ohh boy. Not to mention bugged/(or retarded?) trash and a bugged boss. GG Blizzard, GG...
Vinen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2009, 09:03 PM   #210 (permalink)
nosf
Registered User
 
nosf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 791
+16 Internets
Can't even log on now; we all zoned into Ulduar and blammo! Dead instance server.
nosf is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

uberguilds network



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6