|
|
Or, use your gamerDNA username: (more...)
| ||||||
| |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #4246 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Washington
Posts: 518
| Quote:
In fact, I agreed with you and said "active" players in the game are on a decline. I just said the polls on these forums are possibly the worst piece of evidence. | |
| | |
| | #4247 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,068
| Quote:
Notice the bit in boldface. It seems we both agree on there being a lot of people in the starting area, which is why I'm wondering what the hell he was talking about.
__________________ It's turtles all the way down. | |
| | |
| | #4249 (permalink) | |
| Insert Quarter Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 9,433
| Quote:
Having a friend IM me with 'only X people online when I logged in for a bit' is a pretty far stretch from imaginary girlfriends. Go back to your circle jerk on the AoC forums if you can't handle the fact that the game is showing a warranted decline in population.
__________________ I got a list of demands written on the palm of my hand. I ball my fists and you gonna know where I stand. | |
| | |
| | #4252 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,758
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #4254 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,505
+1 Internets | Oh c'mon, don't even try to argue that a self-selected poll of an unrepresentative sample of the population can be generalized to the population itself. You just. Cannot. Do that. That poll is meaningless. You cannot even begin to estimate, and correct for, the kurtosis of the sample versus that of the parent pop., nor is it even a god damned random sample, but a self-select sample. This isn't, "this may be a useful tool to tell us how it's going with AOC in general", this is "a bunch of useless chicken scratches". Just stop using that damned poll. It is completely meaningless. You can't make any inferences based upon it.. Oh wait, I hear Ron Paul is on the way to the white house, I guess unrepresentative self-select polling really does work! As well, your testing measured is completely bogus and you don't even try to hide it. Sunday evening? The time when servers in most game are at their least active except for some very odd hours? That you don't take into account that play style shifts as time moves on, and that any conclusions you reach are completely uncalled for based on the shoddy data? I'd like to see some real numbers. Not from Mr. Hatchet, not from a thoroughly useless poll, but some piece of actual data. Until you have real numbers it's just going to be squabbling. Last edited by Schatze : 07-02-2008 at 02:52 AM. |
| | |
| | #4255 (permalink) | |
| WAAAGH Join Date: May 2006 Location: Washington (STATE)
Posts: 1,058
+4 Internets | Update notes: Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #4257 (permalink) | |
| WAAAGH Join Date: May 2006 Location: Washington (STATE)
Posts: 1,058
+4 Internets | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #4259 (permalink) |
| Tunare's most surly gnome Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Sunny Upstate NY
Posts: 987
+4 Internets | Alchemy satchel-things are apparently in the game again. Nothing like a kludgey stop-gap solution that itself needs a combination of additional kludges to implement. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |