|
| | #736 (permalink) | |
| Has a 2 inch dysfunctional penis Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 513
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #737 (permalink) | |
| title? I don't need no stinkin title Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 742
| Quote:
Unlike any of the solutions currently offered. Putting points back in the system is fine and my suggestion is viable. | |
| | |
| | #738 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,291
| Quote:
Would that, combined with non-resettable PR's and no team rating (simply average the PR of the people queuing) not fix the issue completely? Also, what if people were limited to 30 arena games total each week, to prevent loss/win farming to boost ratings? Since 99% of legitimate arena players play their 10 games and stop, that would allow you to play 10 games in all 3 brackets or play 1 bracket more heavily. That would prevent anybody from engaging in any mass rating changes during the week. | |
| | |
| | #739 (permalink) |
| ~ Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: An Igloo
Posts: 2,758
| Or..if you fight at a 1700 rating and your personal rating is 2000..you gain 0 points. Making the only reason to do it would be to raise your friends rating from whatever it is to within 100 of yours. |
| | |
| | #740 (permalink) | |
| This is how I look when I post. Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 2,626
+7 Internets | Quote:
Some classes that are great in one bracket are pure shit in another. That doesn't mean they should be punished for having a few friendly games outside of their "serious" bracket. | |
| | |
| | #741 (permalink) | |
| Badger Diplomacy Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: The Dairy State
Posts: 5,801
| This has all gotten way too complex.
__________________ ____________ Stupid is a strong horse. It can be ridden far. Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #742 (permalink) | |
| Has a 2 inch dysfunctional penis Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 513
| Quote:
Here is a much better solution that doesn't screw the entire playerbase over. 1) Don't let players transfer ownership of a team. Right there, team selling is gone and would it really cause much of a problem? Not really. Chances are someone has an alt they can buy the team with, that would allow the main characters to switch teams when they want to. They could also just lower the cost of purchasing a team. 2) Don't let teams face teams from their own realm. Boom, wave goodbye to 99% of win trading. What's the downside to this? It might pose a problem if a battleground has most or all of the top teams from the same realm. This would really only affect teams over 2200 anyway soooo 2a) Insert an npc in game to allow players over 2200 to face each other from the same realm if and only if no other team is queueing. This could be heavily monitored and they could place in game limitations on the number of games you could play for these exceptional circumstances. 2b) Change gladiator titles from rating to an end of season tournament where players are entered if the team is above a certain rating, say 2250, which personally I think would be better anyway. You could make it so everyone who had over 2250 gets a gladiator title, but they can expand on the rewards for 1st, 2nd and 3rd place in the tournaments. You would still be able to purchase points, which who the hell cares anyway, you can afk 10 games a week and get enough points eventually. You would no longer be able to sell a team, and it eliminate almost all win trading, and the end of season tournaments would cut out all of the stupid griping about the cheating. Furthermore, a tournament is probably better anyway since Blizzard employees will get to watch the matches, they might learn something about what actually needs balancing in pvp. Obviously this all depends on whether or not it is possible to code it so players can't queue against teams on their own realm but it is a solution that actually cuts out most of the major problems without screwing the entire playerbase over in the process. Last edited by Mippo : 05-15-2008 at 01:44 PM. | |
| | |
| | #745 (permalink) | |
| Badger Diplomacy Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: The Dairy State
Posts: 5,801
| How about we just remove teams entirely. You go queue and it inserts whoever you group is in. Team rating does not exist, only personal rating. You face opponents near of your team's average and point gain and point loss are calculated individually. Resetting your rating is not possible. There is a point minimum that will be earned regardless of how low your points go. It would be just a bit lower than what you can get if you make a new team and lose ten matches per week now.
__________________ ____________ Stupid is a strong horse. It can be ridden far. Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #747 (permalink) | |
| Badger Diplomacy Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: The Dairy State
Posts: 5,801
| I don't see the point in having both team ratings and personal ratings.
__________________ ____________ Stupid is a strong horse. It can be ridden far. Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #748 (permalink) | |
| I Self Lord And Master Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 658
| Quote:
Is shit seriously that bad? I am rerolling now and picked a lowbie shaman I had on BDF. Only been playing a few days now, but I may want to reconsider if shit is really that bad there. Or resign myself to a transfer. | |
| | |
| | #749 (permalink) | |
| NEGGAS Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 834
| Whats the best CST/EST server?
__________________ Quote:
| |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |