|
| | #601 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,647
| Quote:
| |
| |
| | #602 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 575
+5 Internets | Clan of Conan Quote:
| |
| |
| | #606 (permalink) |
| Insert Quarter Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 9,024
| DX10 mode? That would require it actually being in the game. So far it's not.
__________________ I got a list of demands written on the palm of my hand. I ball my fists and you gonna know where I stand. |
| |
| | #609 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Darlington, UK
Posts: 79
+1 Internets | Quote:
| |
| |
| | #610 (permalink) | ||
| Registered User Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 542
+9 Internets | Quote:
Quote:
You don't see what I am saying. I'm talking from a development point of view. Yes, its been a really shit beta for a lot of the testers, particularly the tech testers, but the development of the game is what I am talking about. Just the facts that : i) they have different sets of testers, doing different things and, ii) the fact that one group of their testers has focused testing scheduled for them, even covering things like account creation, are steps in the right direction for game development. Yes it can be done better, yes a lot of it sucks ass for the actual testers, but I stand by what I said. What they are doing is a step in the right direction for game development. People need to decide what they want - at the moment it seems people want a polished game when they enter beta, which is the finished experience, when what is really needed - MOST especially in an MMORPG - is a beta that is a ball ache for testers, but helps in the development of a game. Again I'm not commenting on the state of the game, just the beta process. Last edited by Flight : 04-17-2008 at 02:40 AM. | ||
| |
| | #611 (permalink) | |
| Insert Quarter Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 9,024
| Quote:
It's the single worst beta I have ever seen and I daresay even VG was handled better. And this isnt speaking on the quality of the game.. which is slightly better than VG.
__________________ I got a list of demands written on the palm of my hand. I ball my fists and you gonna know where I stand. | |
| |
| | #612 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 38
| Quote:
Now go back to your thread in VG and play with your friends, when I post something and only need a gimp ass to reply, i`ll call you...k? | |
| |
| | #613 (permalink) |
| King Lithka Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 115
| JayRebb-- Say more about no siege/PvP. Is that really true? That was their single selling point on this game...you have to be kidding.
__________________ Ismaris of Xanit K'Ven |
| |
| | #614 (permalink) |
| Insert Quarter Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 9,024
| Yes, it is true. It's not in tech or general beta at this point. No, the gamespot weekend has nothing to do with it. They are just testing the CtF BG all weekend.
__________________ I got a list of demands written on the palm of my hand. I ball my fists and you gonna know where I stand. |
| |
| | #615 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Cleveland
Posts: 362
| Quote:
This is one of the better beta's in that the feedback has been absorbed and there are good, viable changes being made in an ongoing nature to a fairly stable and well designed game. Your point should be you don't like how they do beta, and wish it was more like WOWs open FFA approach. You also misrepresent that things are not in the game/beta just because you do not have access to them. Most of the points in this thread about dislike for the game stem from people who likely never made it past level 10, or dislike the fact they volunteered to be testers, and are pissed they don't get free evaluation open ended gameplay. They are rubbish. | |
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |