|
| |||||||
| |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #226 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,115
| Why are people saying "decide to level with someone?" That implies that someone has also decided to level with you... which in turn implies that it isn't exactly a choice but an arrangement. And so you have a bunch of people who prefer making the choice of soloing with a dps spec over making the choice of sitting around and hoping someone else needs to level as a healing spec. Thank god for the dps specs, but the next step is to make classes that rely on a group (healers, tanks) able to do those roles at a competitive levelling pace as damage. It could simply be requiring X% of talent point spent in a tree to be able to use a spell (or gear). Say, if you're 100% holy you can make use of an npc tank. Control it like MC or a pet, whichever. If you're X% prot, you get a little healbot to control. In short, when you play a single player RPG, you are everything - dps, healing and tank. If levelling up is largely a single player experience, the concept fits. I can easily see the next wave of mmorpgs having you controlling multiple characters at the same time - similar to guildwars but with more control. Like a final fantasy in auto play without the AI modules. |
| | |
| | #227 (permalink) | |
| Lord of the Dance Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,261
+53 Internets | Quote:
I 3-box in WoW and it definately makes things more interesting. If there was more built in support for it, it would be tits. | |
| | |
| | #229 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,181
+15 Internets | I won't bother, it's not that bad, probably could have used a break in the first paragraph, but since there's punctuation and not many typos/grammar error, I consider it's good enough. If more than 3 lines in a row are annoying to read for you, you might want to consider changing your resolution. The main issue tho is derails and sidethoughts which I express with parentheses, which tends to clog up sentences by making them longer than intended. I'll make an effort just for you. Quote:
These games already exist, last one I played was Granado Espada, korean game from a few years ago, it's a pure grind fest, but was surprisingly not that bad and somewhat funny because of the multiple chars. You played a "family" which consisted of 3characters, and pvp was quite fun with all the combos available. Sadly it was also a very shallow game once you reached level cap and pvp was fun until you had more than 10people in the same zone then it'd lag to no end. Gods&Heroes had a system like that too, but I didn't play enough to check it out, and seems the game is dead now anyway. I believe however that system will tend to be hard to balance both in pve and pvp, and even on the leveling aspect. The pets would become very powerful, and as such become a necessity, and a part of your char. Then you lose class identity if everyone gets a pet that does what he can't do well. Imo it'd bring more problems than anything. You could just go the route warhammer/aoc have taken(or trying to at least), with no pure healer, as in sitting on your ass whackamoling health bars, but involved in combat, which means you have access to dps and healing all the time. I used Autohotkey when I leveled my BE paladin, dual logging my hunter and setting up some simple macros. It worked quite well, and iirc it was free, or I used the trial, forgot. I even did some 2vs2 arenas with it, but it was pretty terrible because of positionning issues ^^. | |
| | |
| | #230 (permalink) |
| Banned Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: The NW
Posts: 3,497
| Wouldn't you get banned for autohotkey? I seem to remember something in the User Agreement. edit: as far as I understand it, software macroing = bad, hardware macroing = bad; however a device that sends your keyboard input to multiple computers is ok. |
| | |
| | #231 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,181
+15 Internets | Well yeah in theory you can get banned for it I guess. However, I'm there at my computer, playing my own accounts, so I didn't care much. Sending info to an inactive window can be banned whatever the program you use tho, since that's what you suggested, was just saying what I used. It's the same as using my programmable keys on my G11 and making macros for press 1, alt tab, press 1, alt tab. I even had some of these for specific stuff, but the keys aren't as accessible compared to just pressing 1,2,3 etc. |
| | |
| | #232 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,115
| I guess the answer is to make your trio of players simply a cluster with interface to control. World of Warcraft: Trinity Imagine an FPS formation control so you can press a button to spread out, or a button to stay together. And a macro-view control that allows you to position people out of LOS / etc. Then all your abilities are on one screen. Perhaps it isn't as simple as a "pet," but that you can play as or level up 2+ characters at the same time. Like the FF job system but rather than hybridizing everyone, you actually play 2 chars. World of Warcraft: Sam da Man |
| | |
| | #233 (permalink) | |
| Still Lost Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,030
| Quote:
Ill put it in spoilers because its a huge script, but the one listed will copy pretty much all key strokes. Or you can use your own or find others... Spoiler Alert, click show to read: | |
| | |
| | #236 (permalink) |
| nerd Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,377
| Whats the hack to prevent mouse wigout? I currently use that feature bind screen (or whatever its called) where it locks the mouse to the screen, and have my 4th mouse button set to that. So whenever i scroll across to my 2nd pc monitor I quickly bind, do whatever, unbind, then scroll back across. A bit annoying but without it using mouselook just spins the screen crazy. |
| | |
| | #237 (permalink) |
| Sly. Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Here
Posts: 553
+9 Internets | Anything to improve transportation would fucking sweet. Seriously. That's probably the most annoying part of it all is slow-ass-running, even after getting a low-level alt bound at Shat. (Is it EQ taboo to say that druids need teleports?) |
| | |
| | #238 (permalink) | |
| Lord of the Dance Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,261
+53 Internets | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #239 (permalink) | |
| homosexual Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,238
| Quote:
The latest healing->dmg changes are more than we could have ever asked for, resto shamans, holy priests, and resto druids will be very, very happy. Holy pallies are still fucked though, enjoy your extra consecrate damage or something. | |
| | |
| | #240 (permalink) | |
| That must be very tiring Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Toe-rawn-toe
Posts: 1,164
| Quote:
Anyways, personally I prefer getting into groups as the role I'm specced for (enhancement). That way the hunters/melee dps classes don't get pissy when their healer rolls on that +AP mail/high dps weapon... I'm not running five mans to get healing gear, I want actual upgrades to my enhancement set (I don't raid, so 5 mans/(soon to be) heroics will be my main source of gear).
__________________ Ridiculous | |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |