|
| | #1 (permalink) | |
| Slantiest Eyes in Town Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Hawaii
Posts: 4,828
+6 Internets | Fallout MMO coming I don't recall seeing any Fallout related threads other then wishful thinking. Some of us might have heard about the Fallout license aquirement by Bathesda. Interplay will start raising the capitol it needs to fund Fallout MMO development. Their projected timetable calls for a 2010 release. Interplay Ready for "Fallout Online" : Next Generation - Interactive Entertainment Today, Video Game and Industry News Quote:
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/da...24/ex10-49.txt I'm extremely wary of Interplay developing this inhouse. Last edited by Zarcath : 08-18-2007 at 02:54 AM. | |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 711
| I have this mental image in my mind's eye of the Fallout license as a pristine, radiant projection of the female form, coalesced in part and in whole of ensorcelling beauty, and of Interplay as the drunket frat fuck in his fraternity's closet blindly groping with untrained hands as the rape commences. It's not pretty. |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Romo is a manwhore | Depends on who they get to head the project up. BTW, this isn't necessarily news except for them saying that they're persuing funding. Back when it was announced that Bethesda was getting the rights to make a Fallout game, special mention was made in almost every article I read that stated Interplay maintained the exclusive rights to create an MMO of the property. |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Romo is a manwhore | I'm sure they would, or possibly will eventually, but when the Fallout license was up for grabs, Interplay made sure to include a caveat which allowed them to keep the rights for that purpose only. Besides, given Bethesda's track record with single player games, we're better off... for now. |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) | |
| Shiny Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Calgary
Posts: 912
| Quote:
Anyhow, call me in '09 and we can bash what the fuckers end up doing to a solid game franchise that doesn't in any way translate into a solid MMO setting.
__________________ ... | |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: The land of sunshine
Posts: 1,473
| I've always thought Bethesda's worldbuilding was very good, but their mechanics in most games sucked. If they'd just take care of making the world and let a company like interplay deal with the actual, you know, gameplay, then that would be a perfect fit. |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 70
| I don't know why you would say Fallout doesn't translate into an MMO. I think it's a damn good fit actually and would be more interesting than yet-another-high-fantasy game if done well. Doing it well, however, is a different matter entirely. |
| | |
| | #12 (permalink) | |
| Social Butterfly Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 1,406
+47 Internets | Bethesda has the balls on this project thats for sure. 3.0 OWNERSHIP. 3.1 SOLE OWNER. Interplay acknowledges and agrees that, as between the parties, Bethesda is the sole and exclusive owner of the Licensed Marks. Bethesda may, in its sole discretion, maintain or discontinue the maintenance of any applications and registrations for the Marks or seek registration for any Licensed Mark at any time.
__________________ Quote:
Last edited by Tyen : 08-18-2007 at 11:35 AM. | |
| | |
| | #14 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 524
| Try playing a non-GOTY edition of Morrowind to find out exactly why Bethesda shouldn't make an mmorpg in house. Quote:
| |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |