|
|
Or, use your gamerDNA username: (more...)
| ||||||
| |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #31 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 269
| This rumor seems very rumorish. Every post seems to be sourced from one person (the vgflames admin), who doesn't mention that he actaully has any inside infoz or anything. Not that I'd be surprised if it does turn true, just the rumor source doesn't seem very credible atm. |
| | |
| | #32 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 447
+4 Internets | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #33 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 826
| Brad and co bought it back because they fully believed they would garner a percentage of WOW numbers with ease. He believed, despite a ton of evidence to the contrary, that VG would be the next best thing to sliced bread. -shrug- It always felt like there was a pretty large disconnect between what the game was actually doing and what Brad believed was going to happen. Look at it this way....Brad had a lot to do with the direction EQII was taking when it released and we know how that went. SOE put some new folks in charge and allowed them to change the direction of the game and its a damn fine game now. If they do the same with VG then it stands a very good chance of realizing the possibilities it has under the hood. If you look at what happened to EQII after the 'vision' for the game was redone by Scott and team I just can't find a downside to SOE taking VG over. |
| | |
| | #34 (permalink) |
| Plugged In Like Neo | Do you really think that McQuaid and Sigil would have given up on VG before it even released? I highly doubt with how vocal Aradune was/is about his "Vision" and the future of the game that he would have abandoned his efforts. Regardless how great of a potential for disaster, I don't think any company owner wants to give up on years of work and money without proof that its a sinking ship first. |
| | |
| | #35 (permalink) | |
| Insert Quarter Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 11,158
| Quote:
Besides, this rumor is on every forum now and it would take about 2 minutes for someone from Sigil to say 'Umm this isn't happening' and be done with it. Seems to me you would want to squash this rumor ASAP, especially when your game is having the 'growing pains' that VG is.
__________________ I got a list of demands written on the palm of my hand. I ball my fists and you gonna know where I stand. | |
| | |
| | #36 (permalink) | |
| Banned Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: n/a
Posts: 1,607
+1 Internets | Quote:
Last edited by Maxxius; 04-25-2007 at 12:24 PM.. | |
| | |
| | #39 (permalink) | |
| You just keep thinkin' Butch. That's what you're good at. Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 761
+8 Internets | Quote:
On a side note, I logged in last night to check out these performance fixes, after the initial hitching as everything was cached, the game really did run a lot smoother. I won’t have time to play it now, but it is really too bad they screwed that release up, a lot more people would have a lot more positive things to say about VG had this been the release version. | |
| | |
| | #40 (permalink) |
| Defenately Rediculus Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 597
| Sigil owns all of VG, I don't think they have anyone they need to answer to financially... at least not anyone that could MAKE them sell. -Merge servers -Cut CS -Rig-up a tight as hell LFG system, and some travel assistance (bats, summons, stones, w/e) -Send the Vision(tm) on vacation for a while. -Take your time to shore up the engine. Fire off everyone who isn't capable of making your engine not run like shit on >50% of the people who would ever want to try it's regular PC. Create some "zones" ala WoW if that's what it takes to not make moving about a nightmare for a lot of people. I don't care how awesome a game is... if it runs like shit I get angry, and when I'm angry I'm never having a good time. Turn your dev mode to subsistence. Get some tools for players to create content. You work on the engine, they work on the content... hopefully by the time your game doesn't run like shit on a reasonably priced computer of that moment, you will have enough content to keep people mildly interested. Then you slowly work the vision back into the game. All SOE is going to do is merge servers, and abolish CS. SOE is like hospice for MMOs (sorry EQ2). |
| | |
| | #41 (permalink) | |
| I am not your billboard. Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,673
| SOE has owned this game from the day Microsoft pulled out, and SOE stepped in. It was true back then, and it's true now. So they change the letterhead on the stationary, big fucking deal. I want to know what they are going to do with Brad ! Will he ride off into the sunset on his dirtbike ? Decend like the Angel of Death on yet another MMO ? Demolish some other genre or mode of gaming ? Grow daisies in the insane aslyum he should be locked up in ??!? MORE INFOZ PLZ!
__________________ Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #43 (permalink) |
| Fuck Art, Let's Kill Join Date: May 2002 Location: Hell
Posts: 7,242
| How they'd plan to fix VG without turning it into EQ2.01 is the real mystery to me. That might make VG a vastly better game than it is now, but it would hurt their current [and already very good] game.
__________________ ...the whole world's going to blow up anyway. I might as well keep my pride. eRepublik Referral (PM me for assistance if you start up using my link) |
| | |
| | #44 (permalink) | |
| Forza Roma! Forza Azzuri! Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: San Angelo, TX
Posts: 3,861
| Quote:
Character models and animations and spell particles are ALL completely horrid. End of story. | |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |