|
|
Or, use your gamerDNA username: (more...)
| ||||||
| |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #31 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,591
| People on my realms forums are shitting a brick over this, and it hasn't even happened yet. I don't see any real downside to splitting highly populated servers, because here is my TBC predictions in the first month: 1) Anything non instanced is going to be unplayable and highly competed for due to the ocean of level 60s looking for something to do competing for the same content. 2) Queues will increase by 1.5 to 2 times what they seem to be in primetime now (an average of 300-400) from all the returners/rerollers/mangina paladins and draenai shamans starting up. A server split could help alleviate that. The only downside is splitting up some communities, which to be honest, its like if you moved as a little kid. You make new friends at your new school and in your new neighborhood, its not the worst thing in the world. I do think its a good idea if they restrict transfers to not allow transfers off for the significantly lower population (read: horde), of course in that case if the imbalance is crazy high you just end up creating 1 balanced faction realm, and another lopsided population realm, only to a worse extent. Maybe the introduction of Paladins and Blood Elves will boost the hordes numbers some. If that doesn't, I don't know what will. |
| | |
| | #32 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 397
| The problem is that the overcrowding due to the expansion is TEMPORARY. Server splits are PERMANENT. Now. Blizzard cares if the server have issues, but they don't give a damn if there are few players and it's hard to group during the off peaks. I would run a test: Take 300 random accounts that have characters on a high populated server, then take 300 random accounts that have characters on a low populated server. Then compare the retention rate. My suspect is that the retention is much higher for those who play on high populated servers, while Blizzard is completely ignoring the opposite problem of the overcrowding. That is the empty, lifeless world, in particular while leveling up. Exactly when other players around you are most important. So what they'll do when the issues will start to fade? Rejoin the servers? No, of course. You'll be just fucked. |
| | |
| | #35 (permalink) | |
| homosexual Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,922
| Quote:
IF subs slow then they'll have to start closing realms. But WoW's total number of realms has multiplied since retail, and its growth shows no signs of slowing. When it does, THEN they can prepare for it; for now I want to see them dealing with queues instead of ignoring them hoping they're a "temporary" problem. | |
| | |
| | #36 (permalink) |
| You are just another normal! Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,383
| Yo they won't even let PvE characters pay to transfer to a PvP character due to some fucked up belief that somehow the levelling experience is massively different and harder on a PvP server. And you guys think they'll let Alliance/Horde betray?
__________________ Like a ship without an anchor, like a slave without a chain, just the thought of those sweet ladies sends a shiver through my veins. And I will go on shining, shining like brand new. I'll never look behind me, my troubles will be few. Goodbye stranger, it's been nice. Hope you find your paradise. Tried to see your point of view, hope your dreams will all come true. Goodbye Mary, goodbye Jane, will we ever meet again? Feel no sorrow, feel no shame. Come tomorrow, feel no pain. |
| | |
| | #37 (permalink) | |
| Formidable Armored Bear Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,216
+27 Internets | Quote:
Like Vanguard being successful. Or TBC having a smooth launch.
__________________ A sentence is worth a thousand words. | |
| | |
| | #38 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,591
| Quote:
Sorry, I'd just not play WoW if they weren't doing anything about the blatantly obvious problems that are going to come up. I mean, first off its the first expansion of a highly popular game that is really long awaited. Tons of people will come back just for that. Secondly, seriously what are the MMO options lately? Anything releasing around this time to compete with TBC, well its quite frankly laughable to do it right now. The split wouldn't be applied to all realms either as it was stated and they will consider other options before doing that, and its likely going to only apply to realms which are crazy overpopulated, not the ghost towns people play on for 3 months then half of the players move on to the next new realm/go back to their old ones. I mean, at least its on the table. If anything its surprising to see them being proactive about having a solution rather than just waiting for the game to get near unplayable again and act all shocked that it happened. | |
| | |
| | #40 (permalink) | |
| Banned Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 142
| Quote:
Also, back off Tuco, i play on Nordrassil! | |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |