|
| | #1597 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,266
| A dc2 is most likely better. The second EANM with good skills would provide -24 to damage versus a dc2's -15 to damage. Since eanm is stacking penalized itd be about -20.9% damage per hit on second one. The question is does this compensate for having less shield resist and missing out the 120% extra hull you get from a DC2? The only case where this would be true is if their dps was in the small range from where you could tank it sustainably with the setup you have, and you couldnt tank it sustainably with the DC setup and assuming the enemy is so tanked that the fight lasts a long time. In all other situations the DC is superior. The chance that someone is doing within that small range of damage while having such a superior tank is just non-existant. The extra tank on your structure would make DC far superior against a very high dps person where you dip into structure frequently, and against someone with low dps, both tanks work equally. |
| | |
| | #1599 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 446
+4 Internets | bleh I actually misread that and didn't see the EANM II, however I'd still fit a DCII + EANM II over 2 EANM II's due to the way stacking penalties work and also due to shield and hull bonuses. Last edited by Kazgrim : 04-16-2007 at 08:50 PM. |
| | |
| | #1600 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,634
+7 Internets | Quote:
It is life-friendly ![]() | |
| | |
| | #1601 (permalink) | |
| Banner of Asmadai Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,311
| heres a quick question: i hear people talk about ratting BShips with a frig, and I believe that its possible from being fast and having good resists, w/e. My question is, even with good weapons, doesn't this take forever? Im mostly just curious.
__________________ Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #1602 (permalink) |
| Avarice Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Rolling down Rodeo with a shotgun
Posts: 3,688
+14 Internets | Depends on what you fly but it's obviously a lot slower than in a BS. I would say most frigs (and I mean T2 frigs here) couldn't break your average BS tank tbh, but some hit a fair bit harder than others. |
| | |
| | #1604 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 721
| It's okay if you're in an ishkur or a blaster harpy. Not that there's much point. Unless you specialize in some other means of isk generation like exploration or whatever, standard operating procedure is to get lvl III skills in as big a ship as you can as quickly as you can, and only then branch off into fun stuff once you have a reliable isk printing machine. It really doesn't take that long regardless. |
| | |
| | #1605 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,296
| People rat BSs with frigs because you can actually reliably get a frig out to 0.0 to rat without losing it. Assault frigs can dodge gate camps with MWDs and are cheap to lose, if you try to go to 0.0 in a BS you're risking instant death after every stargate, no way to avoid the camps. Curse is like the ultimate solo pwnmobile besides capital ships, though. 4x NOS on a Curse will suck enough cap that you can run an active shield tank and an active armor tank at the same time, indefinetly. You can take on multiple ships at a time, damp one into uselessness while tanking another's damage and sucking it dry. 4x Medium Diminishing NOS 1x Improved Cloak II 2x Phased Muon Sensor Dampener 1x Y-T8 MWD Medium Shield Booster II Heat Dissipation Amplifier II Domination 30km scram MAR II EANM II DCU II Energized Thermic Membrane II Fits with 6 CPU left over. There's not enough CPU to fit a Tech 2 shield hardener, so I used the Heat Dissipation Amplifier. It leaves you with only 12.5% shield EM resistance, but EM damage is rare in PvP anyway. In a gang where you have others to scramble for you, you can drop the scrambler and cloak, and fit another dampener, a tracking disruptor, or more shield tank. If you add in an Ancillary Current Router you can also fit a fifth NOS.
__________________ "I imagine that at this point, Al Gore rues the day he invented the electoral college." Last edited by Xequecal : 04-17-2007 at 12:04 AM. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |