|
|
Or, use your gamerDNA username: (more...)
| ||||||
| |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) | ||
| Treats objects like women. Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: beset on all sides by the iniquities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men.
Posts: 2,803
+8 Internets | VG to eschew official forums post launch. http://www.vanguardsoh.com/forums/sh...415#post643415 Quote:
Quote:
Should be interesting to observe. I know many of us probably expect to see continued post release interaction from Aradune with this particular "fansite" given the way we seem to have been courted so far. | ||
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Banned Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 1,599
| im happy with this philosophy, biggest problem with vanguard for me seems to be the fact you will need a computer that costs roughly $2000 at time of release to play it at a decent framerate. |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Extremely Busy DPS Provider Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,500
| DAoC did the same thing and it was a good game for almost 3 years. Rather than having one central site and a bunch of forum babysitters, they can rely on market forces to choose the 2-3 big fansites and just cruise those. |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Banned Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 459
| Brad and some of the others seem to really love this game, and just love talking about the genre in general. As such, I think correspondence with the community will occur through the fansites without prompting or bitching. At the most optimistic, this could serve as a sort of filter, bother seperating and consolidating opinions to the different boards and giving a more realistic picture to who thinks what, as well as better review of the input. Conversely, instead of having one place where everyone bitches there are many. My MMO experience extends only to Eq, AC, and WoW, and the official boards for all those games are/were horrendous, so points for trying something new. Edit: I dunno Fogel, some of the unofficial class boards were good but the SoE boards were.... SK.org for instance, was one of my favorite boards period. Last edited by oknedark : 12-08-2005 at 08:08 PM. |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 409
| Could be a good move if done right. Would be nice to avoid the mess the wow boards are. Make a post and in 10 minutes its already on page 3, and 99% of every post is pure drivel. I remember in Eq the class boards were a good place to get info and stuff. The class boards on wow are either "our class sucks" or "Your class is over powered" |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| <3 $$mas Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 517
| Horrible move. Using the DAOC example check the IGN boards for the shit that gets posted there, it can make bnet kiddies look like rocket scientists. Either way it becomes a way to ignore players, period. Yes dumbasses (myself included) tend to come to a board after a major fuckup and vent, but for the most part the old whineplay boards were better than anything else out there. |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 549
| DAOC did this and seemed to work fine. IGN became the main forum site for the game and didn't seem to have a 1/10th of the crap the WoW forums do. It works good cause all the retards don't find the most popular sites for awhile. |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,038
+2 Internets | IGN was NOT a good example. The only reason it didn't seem to have 1/10th of the crap from the WoW boards, is because it had 1/10th amount of people. It was the same level of crap that the WoW boards are today. To be honest, I think they're looking back to EQ days, where rangers glade, steel warrior, safehouse were big discussion sites, and if they had a ton of specific sites like those it could make the jobs a little easier for the respective class devs. And of course, I think we're all a little biased, because we know Brad shows his face here and will listen to our opinions. I can see why the average gamer would feel like their opinion disappeared. Or rather, the average LAZY gamer, since posting on a forum doesn't really take a lot of effort. |
| | |
| | #11 (permalink) |
| Full Retard Join Date: May 2005 Location: Florida
Posts: 1,489
| They mentioned their intention to do this a long time ago. When they first spoke on this subject they said the transition would probably occur near the end of beta. They've been really decent to their "affiliates" thus far, so I don't think we'll have an exact parellel of DAOC. They want to make this work positively, not just dump the load of board moderation on someone else. Private moderators are generally more harsh on their communities than the company is, and I think that creates a better environment for players and designers. |
| | |
| | #12 (permalink) |
| Sons of the Storm Heal Bitch Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 771
+2 Internets | It's a good move, in my opinion. Having watched the development of several game communities through developer-run forums, I've become convinced that they don't turn out as well when the game is released. Leave the community formation to the community, and the game design to the developers. This also needs to be joined with KEEP YOUR GAME A FUCKING SECRET SO THAT IT'S NEW WHEN THE MAIN PLAYER BASE GETS IT! I think a majority wants game info kept from them until they get a chance to experience it for themselves. |
| | |
| | #13 (permalink) |
| had the chance to ask the world to dance Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Midlothian
Posts: 184
+1 Internets | If my job was to read the massive number of rambling theses about game design and philosophy that every doofus posts on the Vanguard boards hoping to get a beta spot or a PM from Brad saying "Great Idea! Do you want to be a Dev?" -- I'd push all that stuff out to the community as well. At least this way the devs / community managers can make alternate/alias accounts and say "Hey, you're really fucking retarded, just stop talking." where they probably couldn't do that on their own boards. |
| | |
| | #14 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,867
| Try not to use 'eschew' in the title of a post it makes me use dictionary.com and that annoys me. kidding... no seriously I am kidding... Yeah I think it is a good idea. Your snr = 0 if you have no n |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |