PvP honor rankings......

Mkopec1 · 09-17-2005, 09:23 AM

http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/th...=1#post4900557

Please discuss....

Dyscord · 09-17-2005, 09:31 AM

That explains why I never advanced past rank 9 even though I was consistantly better than 5 percent standing. I'm sure I would be prosecuted federally if I posted what I wanted to happen to the team that designed pvp. Rest assured it involves a scalpel, some barbed wire, and a starving rat.

In any case I've decided to get back into it and forestall my rapidly decaying pvp rank, in the hopes that one day they'll ungay the system. I'm pretty sure I'll be pvping with jesus though because it won't happen till the second coming.

Phoenix · 09-17-2005, 09:31 AM

Glad to know that your $15 a month is going to good use. Im just speechless on how Blizzard can be that fucking lazy/stupid/whatever about that.

I would honeslty like to bitch slap the person who allowed that change.

Mkopec1 · 09-17-2005, 09:40 AM

Yeah its sure nice that we have to spend 16 hrs per day to complete a FUCKING BLUE PVP SET!

And out of like 3000 people PvPing on each server we see like 10 in ranks 11-14. Great fucking PvP ranking system...FOR ME TO POOP ON!

Angerz · 09-17-2005, 09:43 AM

The best part is that they just ninja edited their webpage and hoped no one would notice.

marketa · 09-17-2005, 10:05 AM

edit: gay

this really fucks over the small servers, want to get rank 11? better fuck over the people you do BG with

chu · 09-17-2005, 10:38 AM

I don't mind that at all. PVP if you want to do it for fun but if you want phat l00tz go fucking raid.

Metranon · 09-17-2005, 12:29 PM

Quote:

I don't mind that at all. PVP if you want to do it for fun but if you want phat l00tz go fucking raid.

the problem is that the "phat l00tz" from raiding are not all that useful for some classes for anything besides PvE raiding.

In the current system if you want competitive top-end PvP gear, the only option is to exploit the queue system and farm CP's in AV/AB 40+ hours a week.

Kolle · 09-17-2005, 04:38 PM

and then some classes can get their pve loot and perform as good or better in pvp than they could with pvp rewards

my hunter doesn't care one bit about pvp rewards

redav · 09-17-2005, 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chu

I don't mind that at all. PVP if you want to do it for fun but if you want phat l00tz go fucking raid.

go fuck yourself

Worfless · 09-17-2005, 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chu

I don't mind that at all. PVP if you want to do it for fun but if you want phat l00tz go fucking raid.

i hope you get hit by a fucking car

Dynalisia · 09-17-2005, 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WorthlessMufuka

i hope you get hit by a fucking car

I hope you get fucked with a spiked branch until you bleed to death from your ass.

Metranon · 09-17-2005, 06:17 PM

tell us how you really feel

Froofy-D · 09-17-2005, 08:13 PM

Hmm I'm wondering why the "1.4%" number? When those in charge of PVP mechanics were brainstorming exactly what % of the population should be rank 11-15 someone said: "hey guys, how about 1.4%!". And everyone else went: "yeah! 1.4% thats a good number!". I have a hard time believing that is how it happened.

Neppy · 09-17-2005, 08:36 PM

They probably don't even know what the settling % of 11+ is. Its most likely that someone, maybe just 1 person, designed the math behind the system, and that 1-1.4 just happens to be how it works out.

The blizzard stance was that 5% of people would be rank 11+, until the pvp ranking webpage came out, and anyone can go look at it to see that right now its more like 0.8-1.5% rank 11+ (only the top 1000 people are listed so its impossible to get an actual %)

I think they simply ninja edited the page and picked a number that looks fairly accurate on the pvp page.

09-17-2005, 09:23 AM	#1 (permalink)
Mkopec1 Registered User Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Detroit Posts: 5,110	PvP honor rankings...... http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/th...=1#post4900557 Please discuss.... __________________ When I am working on a problem I never think about beauty. I only think about how to solve the problem. But when I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong.

09-17-2005, 09:40 AM	#4 (permalink)
Mkopec1 Registered User Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Detroit Posts: 5,110	Yeah its sure nice that we have to spend 16 hrs per day to complete a FUCKING BLUE PVP SET! And out of like 3000 people PvPing on each server we see like 10 in ranks 11-14. Great fucking PvP ranking system...FOR ME TO POOP ON! __________________ When I am working on a problem I never think about beauty. I only think about how to solve the problem. But when I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong.

09-17-2005, 10:05 AM	#6 (permalink)
marketa Registered User Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Tucson, Az Posts: 94 +0 Internets	edit: gay this really fucks over the small servers, want to get rank 11? better fuck over the people you do BG with Last edited by marketa : 09-17-2005 at 10:17 AM.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

09-17-2005, 09:31 AM	#2 (permalink)
Dyscord Harvey Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: The Command Carrier Posts: 1,856 +5 Internets	That explains why I never advanced past rank 9 even though I was consistantly better than 5 percent standing. I'm sure I would be prosecuted federally if I posted what I wanted to happen to the team that designed pvp. Rest assured it involves a scalpel, some barbed wire, and a starving rat. In any case I've decided to get back into it and forestall my rapidly decaying pvp rank, in the hopes that one day they'll ungay the system. I'm pretty sure I'll be pvping with jesus though because it won't happen till the second coming.

09-17-2005, 09:43 AM	#5 (permalink)
Angerz Rock and Roll Gangster Join Date: Aug 2003 Posts: 1,783 -3 Internets	The best part is that they just ninja edited their webpage and hoped no one would notice.

09-17-2005, 10:38 AM	#7 (permalink)
chu Registered User Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 1,012 -25 Internets	I don't mind that at all. PVP if you want to do it for fun but if you want phat l00tz go fucking raid.

09-17-2005, 04:38 PM	#9 (permalink)
Kolle Registered User Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 4,879 -25 Internets	and then some classes can get their pve loot and perform as good or better in pvp than they could with pvp rewards my hunter doesn't care one bit about pvp rewards

09-17-2005, 06:17 PM	#13 (permalink)
Metranon Banned Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: BC, Canada Posts: 1,599 +0 Internets	tell us how you really feel

09-17-2005, 08:13 PM	#14 (permalink)
Froofy-D upper management material Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Orlando, FL Posts: 1,996 +8 Internets	Hmm I'm wondering why the "1.4%" number? When those in charge of PVP mechanics were brainstorming exactly what % of the population should be rank 11-15 someone said: "hey guys, how about 1.4%!". And everyone else went: "yeah! 1.4% thats a good number!". I have a hard time believing that is how it happened.

09-17-2005, 08:36 PM	#15 (permalink)
Neppy Registered User Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 239 +0 Internets	They probably don't even know what the settling % of 11+ is. Its most likely that someone, maybe just 1 person, designed the math behind the system, and that 1-1.4 just happens to be how it works out. The blizzard stance was that 5% of people would be rank 11+, until the pvp ranking webpage came out, and anyone can go look at it to see that right now its more like 0.8-1.5% rank 11+ (only the top 1000 people are listed so its impossible to get an actual %) I think they simply ninja edited the page and picked a number that looks fairly accurate on the pvp page.