Anyone have new patch notes? - Page 4

Metranon · 05-09-2005, 03:13 PM

Quote:

dont worry about crit, that's pretty even between melee and casters. maybe a easier for melee, but i'll live w/ that.

lol

WTS a clue!

Zorlac · 05-09-2005, 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Elgonn
They've stated that the Alterac BG is the one for level 60s. So if BGs have ANY lines at all... TM will still be a zergfest.

- IMO, there will be far more severe zerg fests. While 100 Horde are PvPing in BGs, the 100-200 Alliance that can't PvP because population imbalances will do what? Zerg towns. This time with one difference, there won't be the slightest of opposition because the horde will be busy in BGs to bother "defending" towns.

Dyscord · 05-09-2005, 03:33 PM

all the while blizzard is gonna stick their fingers in their ears screaming "NOT LISTENING, POPULATIONS ARE BALANCED, LALALALA"

Itzena · 05-09-2005, 03:40 PM

...right until the Alliance realise that they're actually going to be losing points for that.

You know, what with certain quest & vendor npcs being dishonourable kills and costing people CPs from the next patch, and all.

Elgonn · 05-09-2005, 03:52 PM

Even if they won't destroy TM hourly. Does anyone think that Hillsbrad will ever be a place to level/quest again?

Itzena · 05-09-2005, 04:11 PM

On a Normal (or RP) server?
Sure.

On a PvP server?
Well, what exactly were you expecting?

Elgonn · 05-09-2005, 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Itzena
Well, what exactly were you expecting?

At least similar level collision like STV. I love poisoning that damn dog.

The Bog · 05-09-2005, 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Itzena
...right until the Alliance realise that they're actually going to be losing points for that.

You know, what with certain quest & vendor npcs being dishonourable kills and costing people CPs from the next patch, and all.

That is, if the penalty outbalances the gain.

Which it so blatantly will not.

Zehn - Vhex · 05-09-2005, 04:55 PM

You think it really matters? They can't get into BG's and 90% of the alliance probably doesn't realize there are zones other then hillsbrad. They'll sit there ganking the occasional person that stupidly flies in rather then runs from silverpine.

Itzena · 05-09-2005, 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The Bog
That is, if the penalty outbalances the gain.

Which it so blatantly will not.

Well, if I were designing WoW I'd keep CPs as they are now (split similarly to xp across groups/raids, etc) but give everyone in said groups/raids the full CP loss per dishonourable quest/vendor NPC kill - no sharing.

And how many Alliance zergs of TM is it going to take before the majority of Horde decide to go play in a BG instead, where the sides will be (more or less) even?

(Or Horde zergs of SS before the alliance give up, if H > A on your particular server)

Benito Fireslinger · 05-09-2005, 05:12 PM

You will have the option of going into the first available one, or designate which instance you would like to enter.

You can form a raid group and then create a battleground, and I believe the members of your raid group will be given priority to enter the instance you created.

http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/th...=1#post2930839

Velk · 05-09-2005, 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Itzena
And how many Alliance zergs of TM is it going to take before the majority of Horde decide to go play in a BG instead, where the sides will be (more or less) even?

Zero 8)

Zergs suck, regardless of whether you are on the giving or receiving end.

I think the earlier suggestion is the biggest problem - 100 alliance in bg, 100 horde in bg, 200 bored alliance levelling random towns while waiting in queue.

I propose the backstab-battleground ! You get two teams from the same faction, and whenever someone dies the loser loses points equal to the gain of the victors 8)

DJk_zero · 05-09-2005, 05:41 PM

Hopefully the dev collective gets their heads out of kaglans ass and reworks a viable 3-way approach to the warrior instead of the one trick pony they currently are.

Zehn - Vhex · 05-09-2005, 05:46 PM

Quote:

Hopefully the dev collective gets their heads out of kaglans ass and reworks a viable 3-way approach to the warrior instead of the one trick pony they currently are.

Consider yourself lucky, we've got Fang as our representative and he thinks the Holy tree makes us better healers then paladins.

Elgonn · 05-09-2005, 05:51 PM

Not that shaman need it but they don't even have a representative.

The best rep the mages ever had was the time the forums got hacked.

05-09-2005, 03:40 PM	#49 (permalink)
Itzena SOS-dan #76564674 Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Near a big fucking castle, the UK Posts: 6,034 -18 Internets	...right until the Alliance realise that they're actually going to be losing points for that. You know, what with certain quest & vendor npcs being dishonourable kills and costing people CPs from the next patch, and all. __________________

05-09-2005, 04:11 PM	#51 (permalink)
Itzena SOS-dan #76564674 Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Near a big fucking castle, the UK Posts: 6,034 -18 Internets	On a Normal (or RP) server? Sure. On a PvP server? Well, what exactly were you expecting? __________________

05-09-2005, 05:12 PM	#56 (permalink)
Benito Fireslinger Registered User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Georgia Posts: 333 +0 Internets	You will have the option of going into the first available one, or designate which instance you would like to enter. You can form a raid group and then create a battleground, and I believe the members of your raid group will be given priority to enter the instance you created. http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/th...=1#post2930839 __________________ Archimonde

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

05-09-2005, 03:33 PM	#48 (permalink)
Dyscord Harvey Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: The Command Carrier Posts: 1,847 +6 Internets	all the while blizzard is gonna stick their fingers in their ears screaming "NOT LISTENING, POPULATIONS ARE BALANCED, LALALALA"

05-09-2005, 03:52 PM	#50 (permalink)
Elgonn Registered User Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 819 +0 Internets	Even if they won't destroy TM hourly. Does anyone think that Hillsbrad will ever be a place to level/quest again?

05-09-2005, 04:55 PM	#54 (permalink)
Zehn - Vhex Lord of the Dance Join Date: Apr 2002 Posts: 6,419 +63 Internets	You think it really matters? They can't get into BG's and 90% of the alliance probably doesn't realize there are zones other then hillsbrad. They'll sit there ganking the occasional person that stupidly flies in rather then runs from silverpine.

05-09-2005, 05:41 PM	#58 (permalink)
DJk_zero Internets are for kids Join Date: Apr 2002 Posts: 1,013 +1 Internets	Hopefully the dev collective gets their heads out of kaglans ass and reworks a viable 3-way approach to the warrior instead of the one trick pony they currently are.

05-09-2005, 05:51 PM	#60 (permalink)
Elgonn Registered User Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 819 +0 Internets	Not that shaman need it but they don't even have a representative. The best rep the mages ever had was the time the forums got hacked.