|
|
Or, use your gamerDNA username: (more...)
| ||||||
| |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #46 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Butt Hugging Moose Jockey
Posts: 4,968
| Yeah, having to choose "Offensive" or "Defensive" is probably going to be a problem, especially for the casters. Specialization akin to that is problem in Camelot...expect buffbot accounts for the 101% unfun buffbitch classes to crop up once they're identified. how'd EQ2 infiltrate (a) WoW thread again? Last edited by Iannis : 12-30-2003 at 07:36 PM. |
| | |
| | #50 (permalink) | |
| Banned Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,390
| Quote:
Also, the phrasing was choppy in rhythm: in an attempt to sound official you come across as desperate. And as a sidenote, your use of "whom" is merely a solecism in modern English; it's better to abstain from "whom" altogether if you are not willing to master the prescriptive rules: "who" will suffice. You ought to use "who" as the subjective form, and "whom" as a direct or inderect object. Myself is not an indirect object, however "him/her/them" is, for instance. They who use whom incorrectly succeed in sounding as a dickface might. Published writer? Guffaw. | |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |