|
|
Or, use your gamerDNA username: (more...)
| ||||||
| |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #18 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,237
+8 Internets | Fuck the haters. This film is amazing. Making it as an R rated film wouldn't have improved it by much, if at all. It doesn't rely on blood, guts and gore like other horror films to deliver the scares and it's all the better for it. You'd be doing yourself a great disservice by passing on this gem. |
| | |
| | #20 (permalink) |
| Fuck Art, Let's Kill Join Date: May 2002 Location: Hell
Posts: 7,244
| I'm sure I'll see it eventually, I just will never go to the theater to support PG-13 horror. Even if it's good, which it probably is since both Bloody-Disgusting reviewers gave it a 4.5/5, it could only have been better if it was R. I suspect the workprint/test screening that B-D saw and raved about was from before it got neutered to a PG-13 though, and that we'll see a 'real' version of it come DVD/Blu-ray time. Last edited by Vorph; 05-28-2009 at 09:50 PM.. |
| | |
| | #21 (permalink) |
| X-D Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 970
+9 Internets | Sure, generally speaking horror is a genre benefits from an R rating, but what a silly reason not to see something you acknowledge will likely be good anyway. I understand being prejudice toward a lower rating of something based on an established IP that you can say for sure would benefit from an R rating, but this isn't that. This could be anything, and it sounds like whatever it is it's good. I've used this argument before, but 2001: A Space Odyssey is rated G. Judging movies based solely on rating without source material to site seems pretty juvenile to me. Last edited by Kiksar; 05-28-2009 at 10:54 PM.. |
| | |
| | #22 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,237
+8 Internets | Quote:
An R rating would have made so little difference to the quality of the film that it's a total nonfactor. Last edited by Cor; 05-29-2009 at 02:29 AM.. | |
| | |
| | #28 (permalink) | |
| Flings doodoo and poopoo Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: NYC
Posts: 5,736
| Quote:
when evil dead 2 came out there was nothing quite like it and thats why it became an instant classic. the original evil dead while being hilariously gory was a really shitty movie. i think thats why Raimi remade it. army of darkness is just a parody of itself and even though its not a bad movie it was no evil dead 2. for some reason when i see the teaser for Drag me to Hell it reminds me of an old Cronenberg film like Rabid or Videodrome. very much on the creepy | |
| | |
| | #29 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Kingdom of Shu, Chengdu
Posts: 744
| Hmm, contemplating seeing this by myself. You can see horror movies by yourself right, or is that against the rules? (I know comedies of any form are)
__________________ "Don't try to be like Jackie. There is only one Jackie.... Study computers instead." Jackie Chan |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |