|
|
Or, use your gamerDNA username: (more...)
| ||||||
| |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #46 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 139
| Quote:
I guess the world is divided into two. Those who understand the greatness of Doc Motherfucking Holiday, and those who don't.
__________________ Bite me! | |
| | |
| | #47 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: melbourne
Posts: 262
+4 Internets | Maybe it's because I'm Australian, but i generally find Westerns to be fucking boring. The Good, the Bad, and The Ugly was ok, but i just didn't 'get it'. I'm yet to see unforgiven which i am told was really, really good. Also, as someone else said, "Big"? C'mon, fucking "Look who's talking now" was better.
__________________ Arse off. |
| | |
| | #48 (permalink) |
| EQ Retirement Home Resident Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Pikeville, KY
Posts: 183
| As much as I love Tombstone and Unforgiven, probably two of my favorite movies, the problem is they just don't have the legacy the old westerns and actors retain. John Wayne, Jimmy Stewart, Dean Martin, Clint Eastwood, etc. really did some great work, in some great stories, that have lasted far beyond the tests of time. I'm really suprised that Rio Bravo, Mclintok, El Dorado, The Sons of Katie Elder aren't on anyone's list. You got to love a good western though... they can be comedic, romantic, whatever. It's a shame we just don't have actors like then as well. |
| | |
| | #50 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 127
+4 Internets | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #51 (permalink) |
| Grand High Poobah Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 3,755
+6 Internets | |
| | |
| | #52 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,879
| how many fucking times are they gonna come out with these lists? how many fucking times are they gonna come out with these lists? how many fucking times are they gonna come out with these lists? how many fucking times are they gonna come out with these lists? Answer: About four Last edited by Kolle : 06-20-2008 at 09:36 AM. |
| | |
| | #53 (permalink) | |
| Seething with dark power and -internets Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,798
| The fantasy list is mostly lame with the exception of Fellowship of the Rings at #2, an excellent choice. I especially like how the gay sequels are nowhere to be seen.
__________________ Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #54 (permalink) | |
| Pink Hair and Skimpy Plate Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Memphis
Posts: 705
| Here's another complete crap list EW did thier list of the topp 100 films of the last 25 years. As expected it's complete crap The New Classics: Movies | EW 1000: Movies | Movies | The EW 1000 | Entertainment Weekly Shawshank Redemption isn't even in the Top 100. That pretty much says it all if you ask me.
__________________ Quote:
< Avarice > | |
| | |
| | #56 (permalink) | |
| Pink Hair and Skimpy Plate Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Memphis
Posts: 705
| Awww. You could have just kept going 6 more places to find Moulin Rouge at number 10. As for Titanic. Love stories may not be my cup of tea but objectively I have to admit that Titanic is an extrodinarily well made movie that does an excellent job of telling the story it sets out to tell. If I was to put together my own list of the best movies of all time (which is not necessarily my list of my favorite movies of all time) I have a hard time seeing Titanic being outside the top 10.
__________________ Quote:
< Avarice > | |
| | |
| | #59 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,437
+16 Internets | One thing about that list makes me kinda smile though... Private Ryan lost to that fucking piece of shit Shakespeare in Love at the Academy Awards, yet no one cares about that movie anymore (or hell, even remembers it) and Private Ryan gets all the <3 Spielberg got robbed that year. Even if their list is flawed, it was still nice to see some flicks get nods, like Groundhog Day.
__________________ Training the citizens of Norrath from 1999-2003! |
| | |
| | #60 (permalink) |
| Kneel before Zod! Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,319
+2 Internets | Well, it's their list so I guess they can do what they want, but how do you lump "The Lord of the Rings trilogy" as #2? I know they're all linked, but they're still three separate movies....Especially if you're going to list Back to the Future 1 at 91 and The Bourne Supremacy at 29. Either group them or don't. Last edited by Burf : 06-21-2008 at 11:36 PM. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |