Star Wars 7-9?

[Kuriin]

Originally Posted by Astrocreep

Its so ridiculous that it sounds completely plausible that Lucas would pull some shit like this. how far are we away from a new star wars with Shia Laboof in the role of Luke skywalker?

Are you like in love with Shia? Seriously, stfu about him.


@ The website. SuperShadow (or whatever) is obviously in love with himself and loves the attention. Kind of humorous.

[Runnen]

Originally Posted by Kuriin

Are you like in love with Shia? Seriously, stfu about him.


@ The website. SuperShadow (or whatever) is obviously in love with himself and loves the attention. Kind of humorous.

SuperShadow has always been notorious for his hoaxs and wild rumors in the Star Wars community, including on the official website forums and for his attempts to implant his rumors in various Star Wars-related Wikis.

[Grimble]

The best part is there are "actual interviews" with Lucas. I also liked the fact that they aren't do for production for like 20 years. By that time Harrison Ford and Lucas probably won't even be around and Hamil and Fisher will be in nursing homes.

[Twobit Whore]

How could you read 3 sentences of that site and think it was anything but a farce?

[Astrocreep]

Originally Posted by Kuriin

Are you like in love with Shia? Seriously, stfu about him.


@ The website. SuperShadow (or whatever) is obviously in love with himself and loves the attention. Kind of humorous.

Or maybe he ruined a movie ive been waiting for for years (Transformers) and is about to destroy one of my favorite franchises (Indy Jones Films) with his douschery? nah, it must be a stalker love i have for him!

[Vatoreus]

jesus you're gay.

[Runnen]

Originally Posted by Astrocreep

Or maybe he ruined a movie ive been waiting for for years (Transformers) and is about to destroy one of my favorite franchises (Indy Jones Films) with his douschery? nah, it must be a stalker love i have for him!

First off, the vast majority of the people on the planet who have seen Transformers have enjoyed it a lot. Of course, it was not faithful to the original material, but I hardly think that having cubic colorful robots in the movie and removing all human interaction would have made the movie better. Do you?

Secondly, Shia is an actor just like many others, and his performance is greatly based on his director. I'm sorry but I've seen him in Constantine, and I Robot, and although his roles were small he was convincing and funny, and I certainly did not find his performance bad in Transformers. If you want to blame the cheesy lines, blame the writer. I bet you're one of those people that think Natalie Portman is french toast in a woman's body and when someone points out how lame she was in Star Wars, you probably retort "Well that's Lucas' fault!". How is this different? Hell, if Indy 4 sucks, you can blame Lucas again, I just saved you some time for your next troll session!

As for Indy, I'm a huge fan of the series, but if anything is going to ruin the series at all, it's wanting to bring a sequel so late. Some things are better left untouched, and I'm pretty sure Indiana Jones should have been left where it was, in a wooden box in some huge government warehouse, right nex to the Ark of the Covenant.

[Wildstone]

Excellent post, Runnen.

[faithdies]

Transformers was terrible and it had nothing to do with Shia.

[Algol Devilstar]

Originally Posted by Runnen

First off, the vast majority of the people on the planet who have seen Transformers have enjoyed it a lot.

Source? Everyone that I went with thought it was mediocre at best. Don't underestimate good marketing.

[Blank]

Originally Posted by Algol Devilstar

Source? Everyone that I went with thought it was mediocre at best. Don't underestimate good marketing.

let the anecdotal evidence begin!

I'm going to go out on a limb and say any movie that makes 300 mil in the US is probably enjoyed by the majority. I thought it was mediocre but meh... people obviously enjoyed it.

[Algol Devilstar]

Good Marketing.

[Blank]

moronic population easily amused by explosions, retarded jokes, and hot chicks.

[Algol Devilstar]

touche

[Astrocreep]

Originally Posted by Runnen

First off, the vast majority of the people on the planet who have seen Transformers have enjoyed it a lot. Of course, it was not faithful to the original material, but I hardly think that having cubic colorful robots in the movie and removing all human interaction would have made the movie better. Do you?

Secondly, Shia is an actor just like many others, and his performance is greatly based on his director. I'm sorry but I've seen him in Constantine, and I Robot, and although his roles were small he was convincing and funny, and I certainly did not find his performance bad in Transformers. If you want to blame the cheesy lines, blame the writer. I bet you're one of those people that think Natalie Portman is french toast in a woman's body and when someone points out how lame she was in Star Wars, you probably retort "Well that's Lucas' fault!". How is this different? Hell, if Indy 4 sucks, you can blame Lucas again, I just saved you some time for your next troll session!

As for Indy, I'm a huge fan of the series, but if anything is going to ruin the series at all, it's wanting to bring a sequel so late. Some things are better left untouched, and I'm pretty sure Indiana Jones should have been left where it was, in a wooden box in some huge government warehouse, right nex to the Ark of the Covenant.

Maybe you're the one in love with him? i want him as far away as possible from my favorite movies, though i admit his tarded role in I Robot didnt ruin it for me. thank god for that. success in the box office does NOT mean the movie isnt complete rubbish. Christ, Harry Potter 5 and Pirates 3 sucked balls too and look at their earnings.