|
|
Or, use your gamerDNA username: (more...)
| ||||||
| |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #31 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 376
| as was previously mentioned, and i'll broaden this statement to include most action movies made in the past 7 years, there is a serious lack of the dirt and grime. CGI has turned environments and characters into polished chrome and perfect paint. The biggest element that really brought home T1 and T2 was that the place was a fucking mess. Fucked up makeup, beat to hell clothing and vehicles, characters that were dragged through shit during fight scenes and goddamn did they look it. You can see the same thing in other genres. Star Wars 4-6 Mos Eisley is a perfect example. sand piled up in all the corners, scarred and dented building and furniture, everything about the environment screamed ass end of the universe run down but functional enough to matter. 1-3 looked like they employed people to level the streets and dust off the doorways. Hell the orcs in mordor were deformed but ill be damned if you could tell they slept in the mud. I like bad lighting and deep shadows, give me a character who hasn't showered in a couple days or spent more than $12 on a haircut, rent a bar that's been open and abused for 30 years instead of building one for a set. |
| | |
| | #32 (permalink) | |
| where is my mind Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,553
| Quote:
If it was just the destruction of Cameron's story I might have been ok with it, but the writing was beyond terrible. Ahnold was throwing out cheesy one liners which made absolutely no sense for a Terminator to make. Another example I'm fond of mentioning is the "heart-warming" farewell between John and the Terminator, where the Terminator says something to the extent we'll meet again. It's supposed to be real touchy feely but anyone who's been paying attention in the film knows that the next time they meet the Terminator kills JC (John Conner) and it's like the writers don't even realize it. Last edited by The Ancient : 11-20-2007 at 07:56 AM. | |
| | |
| | #34 (permalink) | |
| Undeniably forgotten Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 290
| Quote:
Exhibit A: When the T-1000 arrives at Dyson's house, what does the camera focus on? a Trashcan of flaming paper. I think it's safe to infer that these are the files which needed to be destroyed. Also, Sarah connor already shot up his desk with a whole lot of lead, so i think it's safe to say the computer files are toasty too. Exhibit B: Completely crushed in steel mill gears. Don't think theres much to be gotten from that. It appears that the microchip from the terminator's head was responsible for most of the research advances by cyberdyne anyways. | |
| | |
| | #35 (permalink) | |||
| A Relic Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,872
| Quote:
Also, I have pretty low to moderate hopes for a new Terminator trilogy set entirely in the future. I'd go so far as to say that most of what made the original Terminator and T2 so cool was that they took place in the present. It's fun to watch some crazy robot from the future kick ass in the present day, where nothing can touch it. If you set the whole movie in the future, you lose a lot of that "cool factor." The same thing, to some extent, happened in the Matrix sequels. It's fun to watch Neo and Agent Smith fight it out in a "present day" setting (i.e., within the Matrix), but the second they jumped the shark and showed all those "real world" fights between humans and machines, it started to lose its thrills. At least for me it did; I know there is still a lot of conflicting opinion about Matrix 2 and 3. Quote:
a) The file on Dyson's computer when Sarah Conner first starts opening fire on him was a mockup of the microchip. It's safe to assume he had the files on the chip in that computer at his house. Sarah destroyed the monitor, if I remember correctly, but did she destroy the computer itself? I'd have to watch the movie again to find out. b) The arm is still there, regardless of how bad of shape it's in. If I remember correctly, the parts of Arnold left over in the original Terminator were in similarly rough condition. EDIT: According to Google, there were some officially sanctioned Terminator comics made shortly after T2 in which the arm was recovered from the steel mill by the FBI. So, at the very least, we can assume that James Cameron intended for that arm to be more than a simple write-off. Quote:
| |||
| | |
| | #36 (permalink) |
| Insert Quarter Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 9,426
| Wait.. how can the Terminator from 2 be the one in 3? They sent him back in time twice and he got destroyed twice..
__________________ I got a list of demands written on the palm of my hand. I ball my fists and you gonna know where I stand. |
| | |
| | #38 (permalink) | |
| Grand High Poobah Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 3,755
+6 Internets | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #39 (permalink) |
| where is my mind Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,553
| You don't think it's an astonishing coincidence that the items in Cyberdyne's possesion were a broken Terminator arm and a broken processor chip and then during the final fights of the movie, the Terminator has his arm ripped off and his head smashed open? Yeah, there is no way that could have been intentional... |
| | |
| | #40 (permalink) | |
| A Relic Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,872
| Quote:
T1: Arnold "A" sent back to kill Sarah Conner; destroyed. T2: Arnold "B" sent back to save John Conner; destroyed. T3: Arnold "C" kills John Conner in future; reprogrammed by John Conner's wife; sent back in time to save John Conner in present; destroyed. The Arnold in T3 kills JC in the future and still exists in the future, but is killed in the present (past). So he will always "meet" JC in the future and then always go back in time to save JC in the present. | |
| | |
| | #41 (permalink) | |
| A Relic Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,872
| Quote:
As for the chip, though, I'm reasonably sure that Arnold didn't lose his chip in the steel mill. He made a point of asking to be destroyed at the end of the movie because he still contained the final chip. However, it's ambiguous whether a "virtual chip" still existed within Cyberdyne's files -- either at Dyson's house, or possibly at anyone else's house who may have been working on the project. Presumably Dyson wasn't the only person at the entire company with access to those files. He was the one who finally "cracked the code" and "invented" the chip based on the existing chip, but I'm sure others on the project could have followed his work after his death. | |
| | |
| | #42 (permalink) | |
| where is my mind Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,553
| Quote:
"Hey, there's a guy out there who looks just like that other guy who turned out to be a terminator and killed off half the guys in the bunker. Hey guy!Come inside, quick! It's dangerous out there, guy!" guy | |
| | |
| | #43 (permalink) | |
| Grand High Poobah Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 3,755
+6 Internets | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #44 (permalink) | |
| A Relic Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,872
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #45 (permalink) |
| Insert Quarter Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 9,426
| I thought they explained in the first one that the skin was only to hide the machinery and release pheremones to trick the guard dogs. Once they are past that point it doesn't matter because in close combat they are virtually unstoppable.
__________________ I got a list of demands written on the palm of my hand. I ball my fists and you gonna know where I stand. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |