|
|
Or, use your gamerDNA username: (more...)
| ||||||
| |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #16 (permalink) | |
| Fires of Heaven Officer Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,368
+25 Internets | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #17 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 517
+1 Internets | I enjoyed Blade Runner very much. The set design was astouding for it's time, and even to this day does not look it's age. The music, which has always been a key element for setting a mood/feeling was top notch. The story, was a story that makes you think. I also do not have a copy of this, so might look into getting the "Final cut, this time, we mean it, no really, buy this one, and you will never need another" Version(With bonus features that add 15 more minutes to the last version, showing how the director would use the restroom inbetween takes). |
| | |
| | #19 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Seattle
Posts: 70
+1 Internets | I know this isn't the book forums, but if you like Blade Runner I highly suggest reading Do Andriods Dream of Electric Sheep? by Philip K. Dick, which is the pre-movie book version. It has a totally different ending, but it's still awesome. |
| | |
| | #21 (permalink) | |
| The Diet Coke of Evil Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,479
| The reason for the "Final Cut" seems to be related to interviews done by Harrison Ford lately stating that he and Ridley Scott felt there was no need for the narration. Apparently the studio itself believed it needed a narration or no one would understand the movie. Here's an excerpt from wikipedia: Quote:
__________________ Kaige Diplomacy: The ability to tell someone to go to Hell so that they'll look forward to making the trip. | |
| | |
| | #23 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,594
| Yeah the "1992 Director's Cut" had no narration, a slightly longer Zora chase scene and others. It's more haunting and moodier without the narration, but I always thought the narration made the film more noir (in the Marlowe in cyberpunk sense). From what I've read this edition is supposed to be a clean print with a cleaner soundtrack for those modern home theaters and it apparently includes 3 versions... no clue if it's Blueray or HD at all though. I'd also agree that Blade Runner's sound design was way ahead of its time. Ambient PSA's in mandarin and Farsi and the rest of the soundscape works fits so well to Syd Mead's production design. The Vangelis score holds up decently too. Shame the other Phillip K. Dick film haven't been as good though. In fact, most the other PKD adaptations have been straight up horrid. |
| | |
| | #24 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,137
+19 Internets | Quote:
total recall 4tw. | |
| | |
| | #26 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 36
| It's definitely on HD DVD. Not sure if it's blu-ray or if it is, whether it will offer the same features (due to limited interactive capabilities of blu-ray). There's an ultimate collector's edition coming out too (in addition to the 5 disc collector's edition) |
| | |
| | #27 (permalink) |
| Fires of Heaven Ancient Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,139
+71 Internets | So place your bets - with the Final Cut but the "Deckard is a replicant, duh" version or the ambiguous theatrical version? Ridley says yes, Harrisson says no, and the author that tried to write some sequels says "maybe." At least thats what I gleaned from the wiki. What was the happy ending from the theater version? I can only remember the non-voiceover one from the DVD, which I believe was just Deckard returning home after not being dropped off the roof. Bah I'll have to get the Final Cut now. |
| | |
| | #28 (permalink) |
| Fires of Heaven Ancient Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,139
+71 Internets | PS: I hate ambiguous endings. Fuck Sopranos. Total Recall, Blade Runner, and Pan's Labyrinth are all up there too. Its fun to be ambiguous during the movie, yes, but should be resolved in the end. |
| | |
| | #30 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,594
| Quote:
EDIT: As far as Deckard being a replicant that's more speculation about the Voight-Kampff machine test more than deliberate ambiguity. It's cool if you get into it that much but it wasn't a central point of the movie really. There was some flak about Ridley Scott cutting out some scenes that went into that part of the book some more but Scott denied it. Shit, he left in some real oddball scenes that made no sense whatsoever in the theatrical release--like the Unicorn sequence. Last edited by Khorum; 09-05-2007 at 07:58 PM.. | |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |