Finally Posted -- REVIEW: "Star Wars, Episode III: Revenge of the Sith"

[ChewieTobbacca]

The cutting off hand is kind of symbolic - it prevents them from wielding their lightsaber and probably from channeling their force outwards (all their force powers seem to be done by hand gestures) and so cutting off hands in essence is the disabling of the Jedi

[Kelgar]

Originally posted by Zinke
[b]I think calling Hayden Christensen a bad actor is misplacing the blame. He's not one of the best actors, but working against a green screen is tough enough. Plus, he had no chemistry with Portman, which is where all of his dramatic moments are supposed to happen. That could be partly her fault. I think if a different actress had been picked, that had better chemistry with Christensen, alot of people would be praising him for a good job.

Try acting passionate with a guy you know for a fact llikes teh cack and see how much chemistry you can muster up.

[Zanoan]

Besides the fact that cutting off one's hands/arms is a complete disable as he, logically, cannot use a lightsaber. Meanwhile it is also easier to injure a human being's "tentacles" as they are both used for offensive and that sorta leaves them off guard.

[Angry Amadeus]

Originally posted by Dauvan
Read the book, according to it they were already fighting outside on the ledge. So there was no 300 ft to throw him across, Lucas can't even follow his own "movie" book.


p.s. anyone notice the fetish with hands being cut off? Luke, Anakin, Mace, Dooku...

Pretty sure we were discussing the *movie* version here, fuckleberry.

Ta,