|
|
Or, use your gamerDNA username: (more...)
| ||||||
| |
![]() |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #4967 (permalink) |
| Registered User | The funny thing is, when I asked if someone had read the whole Democratic bill, someone said "1990 fucking pages are you KIDDING ME?!" but now, with a 200 page alternative, someone can go "Yep, and it sucks." Did YOU read all 1990 pages of the Democratic bill, and not just the "salient points?"
__________________ "When the last tree has died; and the last river been poisoned; and the last fish been caught, we will realise that we cannot eat money." - Cree proverb |
| | |
| | #4968 (permalink) | |
| Fires of Heaven WoW Member Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 554
| Quote:
A bill for reform and reduction of medical costs. A bill for a mandate for employer provided coverage A bill establishing a public insurance plan option etc... If it's a good law all parts should be able to stand on their own. Producing something this large and complicated smacks of trying to "sneak things through". At this point Pelosi has now gone back on her commitment to post the full bill for 72 hours before a vote because they are still cramming stuff into it. Not a single legislator will have read the whole bill, let along understand it, before voting. Which means they aren't doing their jobs right. | |
| | |
| | #4969 (permalink) |
| I MAEK ART!! Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,933
+170 Internets | Explain. What if certain parts of "reform and reduction of medical costs" rely on provisions contained in the sections detailing "a mandate for employer provided coverage" which in turn has benefits pertaining to personal "public insurance plan option"(s)? What then? What if one gets passed and another doesn't? I somewhat agree with you on a principle standpoint but I also can't allow you to say things like "smacks of trying to "sneak things through" when I could use the argument that splitting it up smacks of "gutting the workable parts into useless legislation". If you want to get rid of that "smacks" feeling your best bet is to read and research the bill just to make sure nothing is sneaking through. |
| | |
| | #4970 (permalink) |
| ҉̵̞̟̠̖̗̘̙̜̝̞̟̠͇̊̋̌̍̎ ̏ Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,647
| The 2000 page bill isn't like a Wheel of Time book that could take months to get through. Each page of the bill is like 25 lines long at 18pt font. It's rediculous. Some lines only have 4-5 words on them. |
| | |
| | #4972 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: 3rd Place
Posts: 2,124
| Say what? Pretty much every elected official is beyond worthless.
__________________ Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #4973 (permalink) | |
| where is my mind Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,865
+29 Internets | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #4974 (permalink) | |||||||||||
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,066
| My favorite Republican commentator, Glenn Beck, is out sick. I really miss him. Stewart gives us something to help get our Beck on while he is out.
| |||||||||||
| | | |||||||||||
| | #4975 (permalink) |
| ҉̵̞̟̠̖̗̘̙̜̝̞̟̠͇̊̋̌̍̎ ̏ Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,647
| Hey guys support: George Hutchins for U.S. Congress 2010 And here are his forums: Questions For Mr. Hutchins - George Hutchins for U.S. Congress - 4th NC District Republican Oh the lulz, this should go in FOHSS. Last edited by Draegan; 11-06-2009 at 01:36 PM.. |
| | |
| | #4976 (permalink) | |
| I <3 Cats Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,254
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #4978 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
| A Bearded Gnome | Quote:
__________________ PSN: Araxen http://www.last.fm/user/araxen The Best FAQ on the Internet: The Official God FAQ | ||||||||||||
| | | ||||||||||||
| | #4979 (permalink) |
| "Hamburgers, the cornerstone of any nutritious breakfast" Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,594
+52 Internets | Lol.. I think youll enjoy this one IRB... Kos makes Tom Tancredo cry on national tv.
__________________ Ask yourself.... |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |