|
| |||||||
| |
| View Poll Results: California Proposition Poll | |||
| Yes, Proposition 2 -- Animal Cruelty | | 55 | 30.56% |
| Yes, Proposition 4 -- Parential Consent for a Minors Abortion | | 41 | 22.78% |
| Yes, Proposition 6 -- Additional funds for police | | 48 | 26.67% |
| Yes, Proposition 8 -- Eliminate Same-Sex Marriage | | 28 | 15.56% |
| No, Proposition 2 -- Animal Cruelty | | 39 | 21.67% |
| No, Proposition 4 -- Parential Consent for a Minors Abortion | | 65 | 36.11% |
| No, Proposition 6 -- Additional funds for police | | 50 | 27.78% |
| No, Proposition 8 -- Eliminate Same-Sex Marriage | | 106 | 58.89% |
| Not a Resident of California but I still wanted to vote in the poll. | | 107 | 59.44% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 180. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #211 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,528
| Lets just not automaticly assume everyone who votes against gays is doing so for religious reasons. I know more then a few people personally that hate gay people every bit as much as they hate church. I am sure there are plenty of religious people who voted against them because they are religious but there is a very large group of people who simply find same sex couples creepy as fuck and for no other reason then they are the same sex. God has nothing to do with it. People can't call those that voted yes ignorant and close minded and turn around and be hypocrits and make ignorant and close minded sweeping generalizations(sp) about the voters. Then again this is the internet ![]() |
| | |
| | #212 (permalink) | |
| Banned | Quote:
Depending on the state, it is easier or harder to get a sex change. In CA, it requires 1 surgery, 1+ year on hormone therapy, and written approval from a psychologist. When someone gets a legal gender change, they get all the rights and privileges of that gender. | |
| | |
| | #213 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,259
+51 Internets | Quote:
As far as money goes, yea it was mostly for religious reasons. I'm guessing religious reasons ranked among the top for voters of prop 8, too. Donor Groups Identified, Largest is Individual Mormons — Mormons for Proposition 8 - Individual Donors, Mormon - 40.40% ($7,615,842.43) - Individual Donors, Other* - 29.94% ($5,643,497.71) - Non-Mormon Organizations - 29.66% ($5,592,015.24) *Includes “probable” Mormons not yet confirmed. Mormons alone were apparently responsible for 40% of donations (though I just pulled the first google result, could be BS). -- Now that doesn't mean every supporter was based in religion, but generally speaking it's true.
__________________ Wii Code: 4250 4436 6536 6872 | |
| | |
| | #214 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 5,522
| Quote:
Lots of people tend to forget that black people LOVES them some Jesus. | |
| | |
| | #215 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 769
| Quote:
Seriously, Democratic candidates have enjoyed consistently high support from the black vote (between 85-90%) for the passed 20 years. | |
| | |
| | #216 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,140
| Quote:
Why do you liberals want to buck traditions all the time? They should be held and cherished. Again, I'm an atheist but I have NO issue with The Pledge of Allegiance, "In God We Trust", or saying "Merry Christmas." | |
| | |
| | #217 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,167
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #218 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: NoVa
Posts: 7,658
+32 Internets | I have no issue with those things either. None of them are an example of glaring inequality among American citizens. The whole point of setting up the government the way it is was to keep our rights from being at the whims of the majority. Rights are rights. Equality is equality. Anything less is not American. |
| | |
| | #219 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 769
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #221 (permalink) |
| I am a Hittite in love with a horse Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Kentucky
Posts: 2,157
+48 Internets | Yes, who would want tax breaks, equal coverage from insurance, and workplace benefits? Not to mention the many multiple government programs that benefit married couples and divorced people. |
| | |
| | #223 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: South San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,456
| Quote:
Quit trolling like Suineg.
__________________ Live like you'll die tomorrow, Dream like you'll live forever | |
| | |
| | #224 (permalink) | |
| Lawl, I founds teh intarweb Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 476
| Quote:
Domestic partnership in California - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ... as far as what is not covered in there...yeah Federal does not recognize same sex marriages but the state sees domestic partnerships as equal to marriage. Also, work place benefits are by the COMPANY choice...no company is forced to give your entire family health benefits or any benefits for that matter. Fucking A, this is basic shit you all are getting wrong. Go read up on the current state of domestic partnerships in california, it encompases nearly all of those cons you just mentioned...including seeing the family in the hospital. | |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |