|
|
Or, use your gamerDNA username: (more...)
| ||||||
| |
| View Poll Results: Who do you think will win the 2008 Presidential Election? | |||
| McCain/Palin | | 583 | 33.18% |
| Obama/Biden | | 1,131 | 64.37% |
| Other | | 43 | 2.45% |
| Voters: 1757. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #5028 (permalink) |
| King Me Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Rocky Top
Posts: 2,478
| Uh, the Obama campaign has to figure it out that quotes from planned parenthood or the media calling McCain a doodoohead meanie aren't going to do the job. Most people think planned parenthood wants to meddle with their job as parents and have an even lower opinion of the media. Obama had the gumption to come out today and say they had some pretty tough ads. Typical effete liberal bullshit. If he wants people to know McCain is bullshitting them he's going to have to stand up and call the motherfucker out in no uncertain terms man to man. Letting the media or planned parenthood do it for him isn't going to work.
__________________ ![]() Just an earthbound misfit, I |
| |
| | #5029 (permalink) |
| Death Panel Supporter Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 2,634
| Is it? The 2004 election begs to differ. Just need to scare 'dem 'dere country folk that the Democrats are going to steal their guns, burn their bibles and gay people getting married will destroy their marriages and they seem to fall in line. |
| |
| | #5031 (permalink) | |
| Death Panel Supporter Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 2,634
| Quote:
Leadership, character, ideas, intelligence, wisdom and political acumen are what are important to me in a president. | |
| |
| | #5032 (permalink) |
| "Hamburgers, the cornerstone of any nutritious breakfast" Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,593
+52 Internets | Why the fuck would anyone release a good tough ad today? Its Hurricane Ike Day Not to mention its in bad taste.
__________________ Ask yourself.... |
| |
| | #5033 (permalink) | |
| King Me Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Rocky Top
Posts: 2,478
| Quote:
Name one political hardship he has overcome. Name one truly combative issue he has taken control of and forged a bipartisan coalition on behalf of. If the guy wasn't a great speaker we wouldn't know his name over any of 85 other people in the senate. Read the Krauthammer article I posted a page or two ago. His entire political arc can be defined by 5 speeches.
__________________ ![]() Just an earthbound misfit, I | |
| |
| | #5034 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: May 2006 Location: North Carolina
Posts: 431
| Quote:
These are not just my questions, but questions for the majority of average voters. | |
| |
| | #5035 (permalink) | |
| Death Panel Supporter Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 2,634
| Quote:
Seriously. Bill Clinton said it himself: Nothing can really give you the experience you need to be president. | |
| |
| | #5037 (permalink) |
| FoH Death Knight Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 263
| Oh, just on the "Bush Doctrine" topic, since that seems to have slid away.. Charles Krauthammer, the man who first used the term "Bush Doctrine", wrote an op-ed in the Washington Post that I found rather nice. It was a well-written enunciation of what I attempted to say yesterday about Palin's statements. Disclaimer: Yes, Krauthammer is a conservative journalist. Doesn't make him less right. It's a nice brief read: Article |
| |
| | #5038 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 873
+25 Internets | Good thing we aren't electing Charlie Gibson to be vice president plus president at least 33% of the time. She is interviewing as the understudy to the most powerful position in our government. She should be educating Gibson on this shit, not asking, "His world view?" (upward inflection). You can even see the disappointment in her face when he quickly responds, "No..." You can't give people the benefit of the doubt for a job like this when we don't have enough information to go on. Its her job to prove to us that she is capable, not our job to assume she is until proven wrong. Stop making excuses for her. |
| |
| | #5039 (permalink) |
| Treats objects like women. Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: beset on all sides by the iniquities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men.
Posts: 3,206
+31 Internets | Jerle, that article is a bunch of fucking bullshit. I see nothing but a rhetorical difference in they way he describes the old Bush doctrine versus the new one. I don't think Obama can change the world and remake America, but are you seriously telling me you think the W. administration actually gives a flying fuck about spreading democracy throughout the world? |
| |
| | #5040 (permalink) | |
| King Me Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Rocky Top
Posts: 2,478
| Quote:
Potential CEO A has a Harvard MBA, is well spoken, and was impressive as all hell in the interview. He has huge plans for your business and, although he has never actually done anything like this before, he believes he has a plan that will take your company to never before seen heights. The problem is he is right out of college, and has almost no real world experience. Potential CEO B is an old crusty veteran of the trade. His ideas are nothing earth shattering, but you are pretty sure that, if you pick him, he can clean up the corruption and stay away from the 12 year old kids. Maybe you won't see record profits under his leadership, but he'll probably sail you back to calm waters and an open sky where you will feel more secure with a more aggressive and risky pick. We, the American people, are that chairman of the board. People are less concerned with specific policy matters than they are just putting that trainwreck of a CEO behind us and picking someone they feel more comfortable with moving forward. Edit: To Fam one of the basic tenets of the Iraq war was to spread democracy and capitalism throughout the Middle East and give young and disgruntled Muslims(terrorists) an option other than fundamentalism. I made this argument repeatedly when the whole WMD controversy was going on, because I remembered specifically hearing people like Rush and Hannity repeatedly hitting the talking points on this when we went in, and I listen to Rush maybe three hours a month and Hannity only when he has an interesting guest on his TV show. People now try to say Iraq was just about WMD or oil, but it actually was part of an almost naively ambitious plan by the White House to do away with most of terrorism in our lifetime. WMD was just a justification. The forceful spread of democracy is one of the pillars of neoconservatism, go look it up. For realz, yo.
__________________ ![]() Just an earthbound misfit, I Last edited by Gilgamel; 09-12-2008 at 07:50 PM.. | |
| |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |