|
|
Or, use your gamerDNA username: (more...)
| ||||||
| |
| View Poll Results: Who do you think will win the 2008 Presidential Election? | |||
| McCain/Palin | | 583 | 33.18% |
| Obama/Biden | | 1,131 | 64.37% |
| Other | | 43 | 2.45% |
| Voters: 1757. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #4201 (permalink) | |||||
| Has a pocket full of shells. Join Date: May 2003 Location: Cali.
Posts: 614
| Quote:
Let that sink into your cromagnum unibrow. That is why in April of 2005 the CIA found that No WMD were found in Iraq. Do you see the trend here Khorum. Does this bring back memories? It should, because every time I get you isolated on an issue I crack that ignorant neo-con skull open. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Badass; 09-09-2008 at 02:48 AM.. | |||||
| |
| | #4202 (permalink) | |||
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,594
| Quote:
Seriously, how fucking stupid are you? Why do you persist on making such a fucking mockery of yourself? You had your amusing inability to use a calendar smashed over head over and over before and here you are to remind folks about that incident lest they forget? How fucking hard was it to check the dates, didn't you pick up that basic research ability during your alleged "college" education? The radiological material could've been under the seal of the FUCKING POPE for all the good it would've done to the victims of all the radiological bombs they could've made from 1.77 metric tons of it. The fact is that the uranium was in POWDER FORM, brokend down from and totally unsuited for industrial "cake" usage and prepared for distribution in a dirty bomb. The fact is it included large quantities of Polonium and Cesium-137, the same kind of isotopes that killed that Russian spy in England with trace amounts a couple years ago. But you don't know that do you? You know precisely JACK AND SHIT about non-proliferation while SOME OF US worked for the same organizations that built Yucca Mountain. Those chemical munitions were there from before the 2003 war but were the type used during the 1990's anfal campaign. And they were there in the quantities that Saddam Hussein used to kill 5,000 men women and children in Halabja and were of the same variety he used to murder 100,000 kurdish rebels during his that campaign. LMAO do you REALLY think anyone believes you've 'cracked' anyone's skull other than your own with EVERY hilarious self-inflicted douchebaggery you inflict on us like when you revealed that you're actually Whoopi Fucking Goldberg. And what do you have to counter it with? Your hilarious inability to fucking READ DATES? Who the fuck do you think you're fooling around here? You want to discuss the half-life of Sarin and Cyclosarin? LOL. We've ALL seen this exact same outcome when you try your hand at a reasoned argument: TOTAL HILARITY. Quote:
Have you produced any evidence of happy socialist families sailing back to Cuba despite page after page of your specious insistence that we should embrace Cuban socialism even as 3.4 million Cuban-Americans scream for redress and while every human rights organization maintains their condemnation of the regime? Oh right, you haven't And when you tried, you had made an even bigger fool of yourself than previously thought imaginable. Quote:
You have no fucking idea what you're talking about yet again. You may want to google up Al Sadr's announcement not ONLY to disarm his militia and to join the political process but to order his former militiamen into social services and to help the government with reconstruction. Al Sadr's militia has already surrendered their weapons and they're currently participating in 17 of the 34 construction projects maintained by US partners in Sadr City. And what factual basis did you provide for your insistence that Al Sadr won't maintain his "indefinite" ceasefire when in fact he's maintained every other ceasefire he's proclaimed before? What basis do you have to dispute that outside of Diyala, Iraq is enjoying a reconstruction boom? Oh that's right. the same certainty you've based your hideous denigration of the sacrifices of our men and women that made the victory in al Anbar possible: NOTHING AT ALL. Seriously, why do you even fucking bother? Last edited by Khorum; 09-09-2008 at 04:02 AM.. | |||
| |
| | #4204 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,594
| About as good as the likelihood of a video of her enforcing abstinence-only education. Which is about as likely as Larry Sinclair producing a 10-year-old used condom with traces of Obama's dickgravy. |
| |
| | #4206 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 440
| I didn't see these posted but this thread jumped like 30 pages in 3 days lol. Imo Hilary and McCain did a better job with Bill but there are 2 more parts to the interview so I am not gonna fully write his decision to go on the Factor as a mistake. Obama looks kind of weak here. He's stuttering ffs. I am assuming it's just b/c he is a very well thought out guy but it looked bad. He does an awesome job delivering speeches but having someone on his ass throws him a bit. Part 1: Part 2: |
| |
| | #4210 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,594
| Quote:
But at least he was FRANK during the surge part. Look at how he responds when he's FINALLY honest about the outcome of the surge, and then look at how he's blustery and evasive about the reality of his tax plan. He refuses to admit what his tax plan is when O'Reilly lays it out (wealth redistribution), and like his performance at the debate he goes on and provides a story about some waitress's "wages plus tips" at the end. | |
| |
| | #4211 (permalink) | |
| Death Panel Supporter Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 2,632
| Quote:
I don't think he is stuttering. He does it in most interviews, any time he isn't giving a speech I think. He even did it on Countdown, and I doubt people will consider those hardball questions. To me it shows he is thinking. He is giving actual, thought out answers instead of canned responses. I don't know if he will be a good president. The more I see Obama the more I'm convinced he is the smartest person out of all 4 people running. That isn't saying he is the best guy for the job all alone, but I'm confident he has several IQ points over the rest of the group. Here are his Countdown interviews (more tonight): | |
| |
| | #4214 (permalink) | |
| You mean I can change this? Neat! Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 12,975
+66 Internets | Quote:
| |
| |
| | #4215 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,594
| Quote:
It's an infuriating and highly effective tactic that imbalances and exposes the guests who tend to structured dialogue to get their message across. But when he tried it on Dodd and Clinton, his interruptions and sneering don't work and in the case of Hillary Clinton, she not only rolls with it, she actually disarms O'Reilly himself. | |
| |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |