|
|
Or, use your gamerDNA username: (more...)
| ||||||
| |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #61 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,299
+4 Internets | Quote:
, i just said a U.S. president couldn't launch a full scale invasion without an attack of at least that magnitude. You were harping on about Clinton not doing much when Bush did nothing before 9/11. Clinton was at least actively paying attention and monitoring terrorist activities. The Bush administration brushed it off to the side.I like how you idiots go from me saying he couldn't go to war without 9/11 to him causing 9/11. Last edited by Kaio; 07-11-2008 at 12:40 PM.. | |
| | |
| | #62 (permalink) | |
| You don't have to agree. Just know I'm right. Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: France
Posts: 4,751
| Quote:
__________________ Stop being bad RIP Spiderman-Troupe 2002-2008 | |
| | |
| | #64 (permalink) | |
| Warning: objects may appear more edible than they actually are Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: The CT
Posts: 6,396
+17 Internets | Quote:
AND OMFG the WTC steel wouldn't melt from gasoline!!!! It shouldn't collapse!
__________________ ![]() Brekk SPriest Liesol LOLRet Frstshck Enhance | |
| | |
| | #65 (permalink) | |
| Flings doodoo and poopoo Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: NYC
Posts: 5,749
| Quote:
clinton allowed the first wtc attack. did nothing about it, he knew osama was behind it and even though he had several chances to bring him in chose to do nothing. the USS cole was bombed and clinton was too busy overseeing his blowjob habits than actually taking out those involved. dont try to pass off that piece of shit clinton as some kind of saint becuase he isnt. GWB is by no means perfect either, but at least he stuck to his decisions and did what he promised, by keeping america safe for his presidency. | |
| | |
| | #67 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Phnom Penh
Posts: 1,059
| Quote:
The Clinton administration was actively hunting Bin Laden. They just didn't come up with the idea to start harebrained wars out nowhere in order to catch a criminal. And as for the outcome, neither Clinton nor Bush caught Bin Laden, and as national security goes, both took a hit to the WTC. So square there.. expect that Bush slaughtered millions of innocents and Bill got blowjobs. I take Bill any day.
__________________ "I believe that man in the end is such a free being, that nobody is able to criticise his right to be what he believes he is." - Georg Christoph Lichtenberg | |
| | |
| | #69 (permalink) | ||
| Lead Farmer Join Date: May 2005 Location: DC
Posts: 1,976
| Quote:
Quote:
Your flip and facile arguments bely an underlying ignorance that should give you pause before you think about sitting at the big kids' table. | ||
| | |
| | #70 (permalink) | ||||
| Warning: objects may appear more edible than they actually are Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: The CT
Posts: 6,396
+17 Internets | Quote:
He couldn't deal with normal presidential responsibilities because they were keeping him busy 24/7. Not to mention what they impeached him over is minor in comparison to the shit the Bush administration has pulled. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Bush made it clear that his goal was get Osama, when he realized he couldn't uphold that he shifted what his goal was.
__________________ ![]() Brekk SPriest Liesol LOLRet Frstshck Enhance Last edited by brekk; 07-12-2008 at 05:15 PM.. | ||||
| | |
| | #71 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,761
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #72 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,299
+4 Internets | Quote:
2)Like others have said, clinton was trying to bring Bin Laden to the forefront as we started learning about him. Back in 93 we weren't sure about the entire chain of command and we actually found/prosecuted a lot of the directly involved terrorists. You have to remember Osama doesn't mastermind shit he just runs a giant network of terrorists. The planning and execution of these attacks are done by others with Osama supporting them spiritually and monetarily. Anyway, if not for intelligence gathering during the clinton admin, and the monitoring, we wouldn't even know it was Osama's organization that executed those attacks. 3)Also as mentioned it was the republicans that continually brushed off any foreign engagements that Clinton was involved in. In fact they attacked him for any action he took and after the Lewinsky scandal he was accused of using men like Osama as distractions. 4)Clinton's response wasn't worse then the actual attack. Bush's action has hurt us as a nation far more then Osama could in numerous fronts. a. Financially: One of Osama's stated goals was to try to bankrupt us through a long struggle. Guess who took the bait? The damage done could quite possibly be irreparable. Time will tell. b. Human life: We've lost many lives since our two wars have begun. If we include innocent iraq lives lost it looks horrible. c. Internation reputation: It was ridiculously high near the Clinton years and now its' pretty fucking low. This reduces leverage greatly. 5. By your own reasoning (havelock) Bush's methods were incompetent and quite possibly ineffective. They just made people feel convinced the place is more safe. Based on the shock people felt in 9/11 one can safely assume Clinton didn't make them feel afraid either. Actually by most accounts people are more afraid of terrorism then they were in the past. So i'm not sure whom he's convinced. 6. Oh, i'm not calling Clinton perfect either, just better then Bush. Last edited by Kaio; 07-12-2008 at 08:26 PM.. | |
| | |
| | #73 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,299
+4 Internets | Quote:
There was a pretty big controversy about it and Clinton got a lot of shit for doing so. I've heard what you are saying a few times (from you probably) but i've never read any reports on it. Care to link where you are getting this from? Last edited by Kaio; 07-14-2008 at 03:53 AM.. | |
| | |
| | #75 (permalink) | |
| Ugly stripping gnome. Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 255
| You idiots do realize that if we caught Bin Laden and either: A. Killed him B. Put him on trial, sentenced him to death and/or imprisoned him. That someone else would rise to power and do something far worse while Bin Laden himself would become a martyr. It's a far better strategy to keep one devil that your familiar with in power then to remove him and shuffle the deck as to who the next threat will be.
__________________ Quote:
| |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |