|
|
Or, use your gamerDNA username: (more...)
| ||||||
| |
| View Poll Results: If you had to vote today, who would you vote for? | |||
| McCain | | 279 | 27.27% |
| Obama | | 648 | 63.34% |
| Other | | 96 | 9.38% |
| Voters: 1023. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #2776 (permalink) | |
| -internets = instant victory Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 400
| I seriously laughed when I read this Quote:
I have no fascination with Obama. He does not talk about the very few, specific, issues that I see with my country. Neither McCain nor Obama are particularly appealing to me. I would be amazed if you could find some evidence that showed otherwise. Because there is none and never will be.
__________________ I know, I'm probably wrong. You're probably right. Please explain your position in detail so that I may understand how to be right. | |
| |
| | #2777 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,064
| Quote:
| |
| |
| | #2780 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,594
| Quote:
In 2008 he gave his sage opinion (which was shared by approximately 18 million democrats btw HAHAHA), and the DNC failed to take him seriously yet again. You don't like Nader? How about perennial Liberal architect James Carville's little breakdown over the DNC's testicular deficiency syndrome from last night. No? Oh yeah, that's right, the DNC's done a bang-up job REFUSING to clarify Obama's policies over Medicare, over Education, over Taxes, over his Keynesian gimme-ism economics, over his puerile notions on national security why exactly? Is it maybe because attempting to fight a specific point will result in an exploration of Obama's spineless refusal to show political courage or worse, his career-long ties to hostile interests? | |
| |
| | #2781 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,064
| Quote:
An Obama victory will represent a change from "gotcha", Karl Rove style politics and the candidates will once again start to talk about the issues. We will once again put value in having a smart President not one that just wants to chase Osama Bin Laden to the "gates of Hell". A McCain victory represents more Rovian politics and more damage to the country and more divisiveness. As I have said before, the people who will be the most affected by a McCain Presidency will be the Red Staters who put McCain in office. They will experience great pain as more of their children die in foreign wars, more of their jobs go to India, and the budget deficit will hinder their children's economic future. The oil companies and Haliburton will continue to get rich however. The only thing they will have after another 4 years of another Republican administration will be their guns and bibles. Better cling to those you stupid bitches. Last edited by I'm Rich Bitch; 08-26-2008 at 06:10 PM.. | |
| |
| | #2783 (permalink) | |
| -internets = instant victory Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 400
| Quote:
Give me an equivalent way of saying the same thing and I'll use that instead. Didn't know you were the jibberjabber accountant, or that jibberjabber supply was such a hot McCain vs. Obama issue. ![]() Edit: Either way, Khorum hasn't even tried to deny the jibberjabber charges. I must be onto something Now I'm just being a troll, I'm sorry ![]()
__________________ I know, I'm probably wrong. You're probably right. Please explain your position in detail so that I may understand how to be right. Last edited by emoo; 08-26-2008 at 06:25 PM.. | |
| |
| | #2784 (permalink) | |
| Death Panel Supporter Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 2,633
| Quote:
| |
| |
| | #2785 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,594
| Quote:
You think you have some kind of "gotcha" or something? Are you gonna proclaim your failure to process rudimentary logic and hope someone would interpret that as some rare species of cleverness? It wasn't a complex fucking subject, IRBitch got on his idiot-box and proclaimed his naked disdain for the roughly HALF of the democratic electorate by laying out his roadmap for eradicating the "Clinton Evil". This roadmap consists of his usual hamfisted bombast, vague innuendo and pretending that the Clinton democrats will just somehow stop being a problem for Barack Hussein Obama despite thousands of PUMA protestors marching in Denver right now with marching orders to track down Howard Dean and Nancy Pelosi and catch their illicit gender-bending hippie sex for youtube.. PUMA in this case is the massive group of Clinton-or-McCain democrats who boast several delegates and more than a few superdelegates who plan on CAMPAIGNING for McCain now that the VP selection has been made. PUMA is an acronym for some happy leftist sentiment of some sort, but most people believe that it actually stands for Party Unity My Ass. Apparently if you catch a democrat wearing his PUMA sneakers with his suit on the convention floor, it's a nod of solidarity with the movement. So although I don't place much weight on those polls--since I actually understand and work with the Bayesian Inference metrics they use and know where their methodologies are limited--they're fine for this purpose since IRBitch fawns and clings to them like some mystical, inscrutable oracle of his Kwanzaa gods. Unfortunately, IRBitch and the other liberals around here suffer a myopic view of things from up inside the confines of their own colons. That's why you're seeing all of them (and I mean ALL OF THEM including James Carville and Arianna Huffington) being blindsided as we speak. That's why he's failed to substantiate any meaningful evidence of Obama's merits. That's why he's failed to articulate the feasibility of any of Obama's policies. And that's why he's about to get blindsided by Obama catastrophic decision to abandon the Clinton Democrats in PUMA by nominating Joe Biden. Don't believe me? You think those poll bumps couldn't POSSIBLY be from a few "disaffected feminazi cunts"? You think Darth Khorum is just exaggerating and stuff yet again? Well, you're right. That poll bump wasn't just from a few disaffected dykes with weaponized nipples gunning for Obama. They're from about a few million of them. There's a few hundred of them in Denver's Cheeseman park right now. They've had massive internet communities going on since early March including my personal favorite Hilaryorbust.com. They've been mobilizing like a rising hurricane since the Biden announcement and the whole world as far out as DUBAI now knows about their telethons and web advertising. The PUMA folks in that article aren't alone. CNN's most recent polling shows that 27% of the Clinton Democrats have publicly announced their support for John McCain. They've even released some anti-Obama ATTACK VIDEOS that can put some of McCain's ads to shame: The PUMA folks marched to Denver in their thousands and even one the former Clinton superdelegates who have sworn fealty to Obama, Governor Rendell couldn't keep himself from making a scene instead of following the carefully controlled script he was given. And yet despite all that, despite the colossal consequences of the Biden nomination bearing down on the DNC like a tsunami of indignant dyke tears, IRBitch expects to believe that Obama's judgment in picking Biden wouldn't make any difference? That Ralph Nader's stark observation wasn't spot on? The only people carrying McCain banners in Denver are the same "Goddamn the Democrats" half of the party that are only there to make their sentiments known and yet IRBitch expects us to believe that they're just gonna be an inconsequential bump in the election? LOL. | |
| |
| | #2786 (permalink) |
| -internets = instant victory Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 400
| I did read, otherwise I wouldn't have any questions to ask. What does rudimentary logic have to do with anything? Apparently your point is well beyond rudimentary logic and somewhere in the realm of the Clinton fanatic blogosphere and some PUMA movement. And after all that, you still failed to explain how a solid 2 point advantage arose for McCain as a direct result of Michelle's speech.
__________________ I know, I'm probably wrong. You're probably right. Please explain your position in detail so that I may understand how to be right. |
| |
| | #2787 (permalink) |
| Death Panel Supporter Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 2,633
| Spike Lee says this changes history, and history can now be described as "BB" (Before Barack) and "AB" (After Barack). He also says you Hillary supporters need to fall in line, bitches! |
| |
| | #2789 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,064
| Mark Warner's speech was pathetic. He is a total wimpy piece of shit. Warner did his party a great disservice. What the fuck was that? No "D" or "R"? Deval Patrick is speaking now. He should have been the Key Note Speaker. The Governor of Montana, Schweitzer, is doing a great job also. Schweitzer was awesome. I am a new fan. Last edited by I'm Rich Bitch; 08-26-2008 at 08:36 PM.. |
| |
| | #2790 (permalink) | |
| Forum Janitor Join Date: May 2002 Location: Detroit
Posts: 10,721
+75 Internets | Quote:
you Fucking anti-American pig, go suck the tit of washington politics that are killing this country. | |
| |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |