|
| | #151 (permalink) | |
| Tuco's Furry Convention Costume is Sparty Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,527
| Quote:
god i needed a good laugh. yes too bad there are so few ladies. obviously thats your problem. /goes back to laughing her ass off | |
| | |
| | #152 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,217
| Quote:
but unfortunately i don't feel that way. | |
| | |
| | #154 (permalink) | |
| Safety Dance Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: West Lafayette
Posts: 5,525
| Quote:
I found my girl by accident one day after I had given up. I'd give you the same advice, but I really think you've blinded yourself towards all women. Sounds like a great date. | |
| | |
| | #155 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,594
| If you DID live in the 1800's you would've had the pleasure of living under the rule of one of the greatest empires the world has ever known. And it was ruled by a WOMAN. The sun never set on the British Empire and Victoria Imperatrix remains one of the most powerful human beings who have ever lived. I'm all about misogyny myself. Personally, I think it's one of those tragic lost arts like cobbling or the original recipe for Shlitz lager. But women have rarely proven to be poor or weak leaders in western history, far from it. This is something misogynistic societies like the chinks and fucking sandmonkeys just cant seem to understand. They've reduced women to cattle and see the West as being weak for elevating our bitches into power but the truth is that strong women like Elizabeth and Catherine have allowed us to lord over the planet while the brooding brown fucks howl at our arrogance. I've mentioned this before but women in power have a proven, historically-consistent track record of being the most notorious expansionists in western history. |
| | |
| | #156 (permalink) | |
| Tuco's Furry Convention Costume is Sparty Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,527
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #157 (permalink) | |
| Safety Dance Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: West Lafayette
Posts: 5,525
| Quote:
![]() | |
| | |
| | #158 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 333
+2 Internets | I'd think having someone like Cleopatra ruling one of the greatest empires in the history of this planet long before we here in the West had our Catherine's and Elizabeths would tend to say that those "brooding brown fucks" weren't always so mysoginistic. At least give them some credit for doing it first. |
| | |
| | #160 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 578
+3 Internets | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #161 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,594
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #163 (permalink) | ||
| I have been working out lately... GADDOOSHH!!! Join Date: May 2006 Location: West Coast
Posts: 684
| Quote:
Also, good to see Khorum back to comment. Got tired of your "I'm Rich Bitch" troll account? Back on topic, do you think Clinton will actually help to campaign for Obama? As long as she considers her to have her own supporters and Obama his, she's sabotaging the democratic party's bid for the presidency. Accept defeat, move forward, Hillary, and save *some* face while you can.
__________________ Quote:
| ||
| | |
| | #164 (permalink) | |
| Tuco's Furry Convention Costume is Sparty Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,527
| Quote:
and i think clinton will do a shitty job at pretending to help. | |
| | |
| | #165 (permalink) |
| Investment buffer Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: ---
Posts: 715
| Seriously, where'd the US political topic go ? Male courtship came out of the notion that men at sexual age (16) were already earning and capable of supporting a spouse and family. Same applies today. If you have a problem spending cash on the likelihood of getting laid, then it implies your not in a financial position to court the girl. The lack of a mate may also be making you look bad in front of peers and as such implies very weak selection traits. It's not a rocket science; spending implies social strata and makes you more viable. Women, as a strategy don't really need to do shit as their future earnings can be taken care of pending mate selection; which is why for 200 years female's focused on attractive aptitudes over building cash flows. Self sufficiency was a counterproductive strategy for their socially imposed role. The general idea however of self advancement from a female point of view is to move into more selective mating cohorts; hence why female enrollments in the US spiked after WW I-- or so the story goes. Tl;dr version: 1. Get some cash, the barrier to entry of the hot/not circuit is self success. Dispute it, but mankind doesn't really give a shit. 2. ... why'd ya have to stink up a good topic about politics ? |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |