|
| | #32 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 8,903
+11 Internets | Exactly. While I can see where you're coming from Kolle, I vehemently disagree. First of all it's not China asking for money, it's aid agencies like the Red Cross. Do you think that at the end of all this, they'll saddle up to Hu Jintao with a big bill and be like "hey man, here's the tab. Pay up." No, that's not the way it works. International aid organizations will be spending millions upon this trying to help people out, same way they did for the Indonesian tsunami, Katrina, and so on. I just really find such an "us and them" mentality incredibly distasteful. Even in the wake of something like Katrina or 9/11, despite the US being the most wealthy and powerful country in the world, numerous countries offered and contributed aid and assistance in the recovery efforts. Maybe the US didn't need it or want it, and maybe those offering it could barely afford to, but it was a nice gesture that appears to have completely bypassed you. I remember reading a story about some African villagers in the middle of fucking nowhere, that have never even seen a two story building let alone a skyscraper, who had heard of 9/11 and despite barely even comprehending what happened offered their livestock to the US as assistance. They've got virtually no worldly possessions and live a nomadic lifestyle from millenia ago, and yet they were willing to help in any way they could. If you don't see the problem in your attitude, then there's probably not much I can say to change your mind or opinion. |
| | |
| | #33 (permalink) | |
| Ben's Secret Assassins - HIPPITY HOP RABBIT Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,622
+12 Internets | Quote:
What scares me is that I'll probably die to a chinese bullet, standing in my front yard with a semi-auto M4 trying to defend america from the yellow invasion. ![]()
__________________ Locke: Where do you get electricity? Ben: We have two big hamsters running around in this giant wheel in our secret underground lair. Locke: Yeah, that's funny. | |
| | |
| | #35 (permalink) | |
| LOADING, PLEASE WAIT... Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Arrowhead and The Swamp
Posts: 1,809
+9 Internets | roger that
__________________ Quote:
www.wakeofdawn.com- FV -Everquest Regime 70 rogue | |
| | |
| | #36 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 437
+1 Internets | I think this may herald a change in direction for China. We already see high party officials rushing out to the earthquake sites to be seen. They are fearing the people. My guess is that several local officials who took bribes will be executed and reforms will slowly start to trickle down. It always takes a horrible tragedy to get governments in gear. The US was no exception during its industrial period (or even today). Something similar to this perhaps: BBC NEWS | Asia-Pacific | China food safety head executed |
| | |
| | #38 (permalink) | |
| Whatever I touch turns to Rickshaw. Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 913
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #39 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,825
| yao ming has and will probably forever have anything and everything he needs and wants. 70k is nothing for him. it's not a sacrifice. for millions of americans that are struggling with bills, having to choose between filling the tank or buying food...well asking them for money is just an insult. meanwhile even after the 70k he'll still have plenty. if he truly cared he'd give every penny above what he needs to live. that is, enough to buy himself food and take care of his essential bills. this doesn't count luxuries. the reason i hold him to that kind of standard is because he put himself on TV and asked millions of americans (most of which don't even have health care and are in debt) to sacrifice. it's the same opinion i gave in one of the political threads about the clintons. yeah, they gave over 10 million to charities. that's great for the charities. however, it shows the hypocrisy of the clintons. they put themselves in the public eye declaring how much they care about the working man. they care about the single mom working multiple jobs and raising kids. they care so much about all the people without health care and the homeless. etc...the list goes on. yet there they are sitting on many millions with the potential to earn millions more with small effort. if they truly cared and weren't full of shit, they would give everything possible. all that money they are sitting on wouldn't fix america entirely, but it could have already made many people very happy. people who desperately need it. they could give away every penny and still be fine. they'll always have a nice place to live. their health care will always be covered. bill clinton can make crazy cash just showing up somewhere to speak. now, i dislike religion. i think it's mostly full of shit. however, this is one of those times when i happen to think a passage from it is valid. recall the story of Jesus instructing the rich man to give away all his earthly possessions in order to find salvation. if you're going to go on national tv and ask people to sacrifice and give money, then you need to be prepared to explain why you still sit on top of a fortune. it doesn't matter if you give some of it away. you're still rich. Last edited by Kolle : 05-21-2008 at 03:44 AM. |
| | |
| | #41 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Tampa
Posts: 211
| Someone is bitter. Your logic is also alarmingly shallow. There is no reason for a wealthy person to have to donate everything in order to not be hypocritical in asking others for assistance. If our society enforced that notion then no one would be willing to ask others to help those in need because they would then be criticized for not donating enough. Is it wrong for someone to promote the importance of volunteer work when they only volunteer 3 hours a week and watch TV for 20 hours a week after work? Is it wrong for a semi-annual blood donor to promote blood donation because they do not donate on a weekly basis? Besides, part of the great thing about charity is the thought that it is the people as a whole coming together to help another. Celebrities are a great way to draw attention to charity because presumably they are trustworthy. It is much healthier for society as a whole to promote many people donating something to charity rather than guilting a few into donating all non-essentials. |
| | |
| | #43 (permalink) |
| Good. Bad. I'm the guy with the gun. Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 733
| Jesus Christ you are a retard Kolle. No one is taking money out of your pocket. They bought an ad asking people to help. If you don't want to, don't. Get over it. I need some sort of extreme eyeroll smiley for this post. |
| | |
| | #45 (permalink) | |||
| Registered User Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Texas
Posts: 1,525
| Quote:
Fucking please. You mean the people who make the cover of CNN for being so poor they have to live in their car WITH THEIR DOGS?! I'm pretty sure the ads are overall targeted to people who can afford to give a little something. (I gave $100 to the red cross for the chinese earthquake situation, I expect you have given something?) Who, in their right mind, is so poor they have to live in their own car, and can barely afford food, but at the same time doesn't get rid of dogs they can't afford? I am sick and tired of people playing the crying game of being poorer than shit, yet still enjoying the luxuries that most people that are "poor" in the world don't get at all. Quote:
Quote:
If anyone is being hypocritical, its you. | |||
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |