|
| |||||||
| |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #76 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 342
| Note that Gamma Ray bursts only occur at the creation of a black hole. And as far as I'm aware that's still speculation in and of itself? They only occur in very, very deep space, making it impossible for us to know what exactly is causing them for now. That the creation of a black hole emits them is just the leading theory. |
| | |
| | #77 (permalink) | |
| You mean I can change this? Neat! Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,810
+29 Internets | SPACE.com -- Life Cycle of Black Hole Emissions Seen for First Time Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #84 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,444
| Well, a "gamma ray burst" does occur at formation as the star collapses upon itself, some of the matter rebounds, goes super nova, and the rest collapses into a black hole (sometimes) and ejects a planetary nebula and all sorts of radiation. But the mysterious gamma ray bursts, known by that term, eject orders of magnitude more energy, something in the millions or billions of what a super novae does. Sort of neat, they can literally sterilize portions of galaxies many lightyears away. Hawking radiation is a quantum function where two virtual particles appear at Schwartzchilde radius except one is just inside the limit, one is outside. Instead of annihilating, one escapes and the other is sucked into the black hole. At least I think that's how it work. But I'm no physics dude, only interested it and took some GSCI electives. edit: but this discovery has nothing to do with a black hole probably, since it specifically says in our galaxy, has been sought after for 50 years. We already know about our super massive black hole because of the insane orbits of stars at galactic center. Well, maybe they caught the blackhole eating a star in a not so stable orbit. But that doesn't fit the bill either. My guess is evidence of superstrings still! Last edited by Schatze : 05-13-2008 at 02:57 AM. |
| | |
| | #86 (permalink) | |
| You mean I can change this? Neat! Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,810
+29 Internets | Quote:
I have no idea if it could validate anything about superstrings, but I wouldn't think so. And have superstrings even been theorized for 50 years? Last edited by Eomer : 05-13-2008 at 10:04 AM. | |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |