Yet another article on global warming - Page 19

voodoochile78 · 05-30-2008, 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AladainAF

Its lunacy, in my opinion, to look at data for the last 30 years, and use that data to form a scientific consensus over the actions of something that is over 6 billion years old.

Didn't some other global warming denier bring up this 30 year number a few pages ago? And then someone mentioned 800,000 years worth of ice core data, which was just as insufficient to said global warming denier?

Smocca · 05-30-2008, 10:49 PM

Quote:

Pretty simply really. Compelling evidence would be evidence that either I could observe, or observable, irrefutable, factual evidence from many years of observed data. Its lunacy, in my opinion, to look at data for the last 30 years, and use that data to form a scientific consensus over the actions of something that is over 6 billion years old.

You understand this basically makes it impossible for someone to convince you that climate change is very likely happening. You are saying you won't believe it until we directly measure the climate significantly change. No prediction, no matter how well founded it is, will ever be accepted by you if you expect this kind of direct observation. We are trying to prevent those observations from ever happening. Thats the whole fucking point.

Gryeyes · 05-30-2008, 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by voodoochile78

Didn't some other global warming denier bring up this 30 year number a few pages ago? And then someone mentioned 800,000 years worth of ice core data, which was just as insufficient to said global warming denier?

One should never let facts and reason get in the way of their beliefs.

Eomer · 05-31-2008, 09:02 AM

Quote:

k.

Anyway, I never said it did, did I? Don't put words in my mouth. I was simply saying that you imply two sources can reinforce your thoughts about the future of society, and at the same time say two sources isn't enough to matter. I just found that funny.

sigh

Millie · 05-31-2008, 05:51 PM

Even the Bush Administration finally admitted to accepting global warming:

ABC News: WH Admits the World Is Getting Hotter

Quote:

Integrating federal research efforts of many agencies and literally thousands of scientists, it reports that the global climate disruption now under way is already damaging U.S. water resources, agriculture and wildlife and is expected to keep doing so -- often worsening -- for "the next few decades and beyond."

And more.

I think it's safe to say that Bush, not to mention all of the aforementioned government agencies, are not in the pocket of the evil, liberal, feminist, Communist world conspiracy the deniers are always going on about?

voodoochile78 · 05-31-2008, 05:59 PM

It's pretty sad when even George W. Bush is more pro-environment than you.

I think you fuckers even lost Pat Robertson.

Manseed · 06-01-2008, 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by voodoochile78

pro-environment

Shut up.

voodoochile78 · 06-01-2008, 12:35 PM

Someone's just sad because the other rats are abandoning ship...

Manseed · 06-01-2008, 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by voodoochile78

Someone's just sad because the other rats are abandoning ship...

No, it's just ignorant to refer to it as being "pro environment."

Kaio · 06-01-2008, 05:42 PM

I'd say it's more about being pro-"not living in lala land," which ironically is a form of ignorance as well.

AladainAF · 06-01-2008, 08:15 PM

So if you don't believe in global warming, you're anti-environment.

Hoss.

Gryeyes · 06-01-2008, 08:24 PM

No, just a fucking idiot.

Ronne · 06-01-2008, 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gryeyes

No, just a fucking idiot.

This.

Move along folks, thread is done.

Hachima · 06-01-2008, 11:00 PM

Anyone that is set on their opinion for one side or the other is an idiot and closed minded. People may have a side they are trying to prove, but to say all research is done and we know all the answers is silly.

JeydaX · 06-02-2008, 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hachima

Anyone that is set on their opinion for one side or the other is an idiot and closed minded. People may have a side they are trying to prove, but to say all research is done and we know all the answers is silly.

Now the thread is over.

05-31-2008, 05:59 PM	#276 (permalink)
voodoochile78 Registered User Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 638 -20 Internets	It's pretty sad when even George W. Bush is more pro-environment than you. I think you fuckers even lost Pat Robertson. Last edited by voodoochile78 : 05-31-2008 at 11:15 PM.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

06-01-2008, 12:35 PM	#278 (permalink)
voodoochile78 Registered User Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 638 -20 Internets	Someone's just sad because the other rats are abandoning ship...

06-01-2008, 05:42 PM	#280 (permalink)
Kaio Registered User Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 1,013 +4 Internets	I'd say it's more about being pro-"not living in lala land," which ironically is a form of ignorance as well.

06-01-2008, 08:15 PM	#281 (permalink)
AladainAF Registered User Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Texas Posts: 1,716	So if you don't believe in global warming, you're anti-environment. Hoss.

06-01-2008, 08:24 PM	#282 (permalink)
Gryeyes Banned Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 818 -3 Internets	No, just a fucking idiot.

06-01-2008, 11:00 PM	#284 (permalink)
Hachima Registered User Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 1,654	Anyone that is set on their opinion for one side or the other is an idiot and closed minded. People may have a side they are trying to prove, but to say all research is done and we know all the answers is silly.