|
| | #752 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 879
| Like they said on MSNBC: John McCain needs to avoid speaking after Obama. Obama, in front of a large, mixed crowd of different races and ages gives a stirring, motivational speech that filled the crowed with energy that they returned. Motivation and energy shared with those watching at home. 30sec later... McCain is there, in front of a half dozen old white people. He speech was pretty dull, and the few people you saw looked half asleep. The content of McCain's speach wasn't bad, but after the energy Obama created in his 10-15min of speaking, McCain just made me yawn. As soon as McCain starts speaking I find it hard to care, Huckabee and Obama could talk about anything and I could find it interesting. |
| | |
| | #754 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 414
| Quote:
The Clinton "Machine" is not to be underestimated however. When they talk about the machine, they are not talking about a style or grass-roots organization or such. It is several decades worth of friends, allies, favors, etc etc that they have built up going well back to when Bill was the Governor of Arkansas, through his 2 terms as President of the United States, her terms as Senator of New York, etc etc. It is that raw political muscle that they can bring to bear that is worth so much. It is why there is so much "what if" speculation about what might happen if this goes all the way to the convention without resolution. When they speculate about those "back room deals" they are always speculating about the Super Delegates delivering a *Clinton* victory out of that back room deal, not an Obama victory. For Obama to win, he has to overcome that advantage. He was playing from behind, and he has to win convincingly to win. This momentum is extraordinarily helpful to him atm for that very reason. | |
| | |
| | #755 (permalink) | |
| My middle name is "Hussein". Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,149
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #756 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 391
+4 Internets | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #757 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 879
| Quote:
![]() | |
| | |
| | #758 (permalink) |
| h8 Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,609
| mccain has the huge luxury of knowing how and why nixon lost tho. For all that nixon and mccain arent the same guy, nixon was far dryer and far smarter, mccain is populist just not nearly as good at it as obama. I think people underestimate the damage going to convention may do to either candidate. not know who has the nomination until just 2 months before the election? |
| | |
| | #759 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,655
+1 Internets | Quote:
And the super delegates are already splitting, many over the concept of superdelegates deciding the election rather than pledged delegates/popular vote. I am with you, I believe Clinton will win, but I am starting to hope he may have a chance. Part of it is because I'm only 27 and haven't had time for the world to truly weigh me down with the depressing reality of our government, and I still believe that we can have nice things. But I should know by now, this is why we can't have nice things. | |
| | |
| | #760 (permalink) |
| Safety Dance Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: West Lafayette
Posts: 5,413
| How can Clinton win? Seriously. Obama is up by more than 100 pledged delegates. If Clinton wins the big 3 (TEXASS, Ohio, Transylvania) by a 60/40 margin, she'll only gain roughly 90 delegates on him. There's almost no way for Obama to not win the popular, pledged delegate count. If the DNC fucks the public over and goes with Clinton, well, then politics is pretty much dead(redead?) for a lot of America. Edit: I'll post a spreadsheet later tonight. My girlfriend just nearly broke my nose, so I'm tending to that right now. |
| | |
| | #761 (permalink) |
| h8 Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,609
| and they thought people were pissed when 2000 didnt go to the popular vote even when that system was established and well understood. I cant imagine the uproar if some shady backroom deals go down and give someone the nomination they dont deserve. |
| | |
| | #762 (permalink) | |
| My middle name is "Hussein". Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,149
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #763 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,655
+1 Internets | Quote:
I heard that 25% of significant others are victims of domestic abuse. It's ok to talk abotu it, you are not alone. | |
| | |
| | #764 (permalink) | |
| Safety Dance Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: West Lafayette
Posts: 5,413
| Quote:
This is what will get him the nomination. A party that selects the least popular candidate through shady deals is a party that will lose a lot of good will among Americans. | |
| | |
| | #765 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 414
| Quote:
Not many folks were thinking about 8 (and possibly 10) strait Obama wins by a massive 2 to 1 margin. There are rumblings from the Clinton Camp that March 4th (Texas/Ohio) is *necessary* to win. You read between the lines on that, and you could come to the conclusion that if Obama wins either of those states, you might turn on the television on March 5th and see Hillary withdraw from the race. Maybe it goes all the way to Pennsylvania - if she does win all 3, yea, it could go on further and it could get funky.....But with Obama's momentum and his inroads on all sorts of Demographics he wasn't expected to do so well with, he could win one or several of those. If that happens, this could be over in weeks, not go all the way to a brokered convention in August. We will see, but I think that is a LOT closer to reality tonight than it was a week ago. Last edited by Leto Eu`Acumen : 02-12-2008 at 08:45 PM. | |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |