|
| | #6991 (permalink) |
| zero signal Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 3,421
| Yeah I'm thinking so. I meant only to say originally, that if Obama's supporters want me to vote for Obama, they are failing miserably. So what if Hilary is in Wyoming? Seriously, petty much? If I vote for Obama, it will be because of other stuff and that the typical Obama supporter seems hell bent on making me NOT want to vote for him based on their generally immature behavior. In other words, if I vote for Obama in November, I will NOT be voting for Obama supporters. I will likely be embarrassed by them and have to defend myself from people like Khorum (who I think is my brother IRL. Seriously, by brother is like politically identical to Khorum in almost every possible way) for 4 years even though I said in May of '08 that I already despise these fucking ignorant "Obama people". They don't influence my vote directly, they just make me cringe a bit when I do vote. I hereby declare peace between America and Switzerland. Peace in our time!
__________________ Last edited by AngryGerbil : 05-10-2008 at 02:36 AM. |
| | |
| | #6993 (permalink) |
| I <3 boobies Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 745
| Even best case scenario: Clinton blowouts (65-35) in Kentucky and West Virginia; Modest (55-45) Obama victories in Oregon, Montana, and South Dakota; A split vote in Puerto Rico; Clinton will still need 193 out of the available 256 Superdelegates available to keep Obama from clinching the nomination with 2,025 delegates. With the trends since February 5th, this is a near impossibility. Obama is a mere 65 Superdelegate endorsements away from the nomination, assuming poll numbers are accurate. If he gets 80 or so before Puerto Rico (he got 7 on Friday alone), Clinton may as well go home and save her money for 2016. Florida and Michigan will be counted, but no way in hell before the June 3rd contests. The Obama campaign wont let it happen, and rightfully so. They don't want FL and MI deciding the nomination, but they do want the delegates sat. Obama may be so far ahead in delegates at that point, the campaign may simply allow the FL and MI votes to stand as they are (with Obama being assigned the 'undecided' votes in MI). |
| | |
| | #6996 (permalink) |
| I <3 boobies Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 745
| Also, can a knowledgeable American citizen please explain to me why Florida is such a black hole of political fail? Why they are at the center of every voting disaster in the country... consistently? Is it the people? Is there a corrupt state government? Wat? |
| | |
| | #6997 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 172
+1 Internets | Quote:
In recent years Florida gets attention since its elections are close much like Ohio. Same fuck ups happen in most states they just happen to be blow outs so nobody cares. Last edited by Zitar : 05-10-2008 at 06:46 AM. | |
| | |
| | #6998 (permalink) | |
| Bossk on a Segway Join Date: May 2005 Location: DC
Posts: 1,429
| Quote:
__________________ "Are you familiar with Garfield?" | |
| | |
| | #6999 (permalink) | |
| I <3 boobies Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 745
| Quote:
I bet he'd still win pledged delegates. | |
| | |
| | #7000 (permalink) | |
| nerd Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 979
| Quote:
In 2008 the state leadership moved the primaries up in order to "be important". Many, many states moved their primaries up, its just that MI and FL moved it up too early breaking democratic rules set years/months earlier. Interestingly enough PA also wanted to move it up, at least the governor did, but the legislature kind of dickered around and it never passed. In hindsight of course it turned out the late states are the deciders, not the early ones. Hopefully the people of florida are pissed off at their retarded elected government and vote out the people who decided to break the rules in a grab for glory, its 100% their fault FL and MI essentially got written off the democratic primary process. | |
| | |
| | #7002 (permalink) | |||
| Registered User Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Texas
Posts: 1,522
| Quote:
Quote:
That is, IMO, the biggest problem with democrats choosing to not count FL and MI. They paid for the primary using some tax payer dollars, and getting zero representation for it. Quote:
Last edited by AladainAF : 05-10-2008 at 10:18 AM. | |||
| | |
| | #7003 (permalink) |
| Your lack of intelligence is an insult to humanity. Get a fucking clue Join Date: May 2002 Location: Obviousville
Posts: 2,036
| The DNC will not and should not accept any results from the FL and MI primaries that were discounted. The simple fact that they were discounted beforehand invalidated the results because a) voters would not bother to participate, b) most candidates did not campaign, c) Michigan didn't even list all of the candidates for votes. At this point it's clear Obama is getting the nomination regardless of FL and MI so it boils down to a civil liberty issue with the "retarded elected governments". Spending millions more of tax-payer dollars is not a solution, especially at the behest of those same retards.
__________________ This logo cost £14,000 to create |
| | |
| | #7005 (permalink) | |
| Rock and Roll Gangster Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,655
| Quote:
I also assume that "Move up the primary against the rules, check yes or no" wasn't on the ballot last November, so they probably assumed their elected officials wouldn't fuck them. That is a lot of assumptions, and a lot of trust in people who really don't seem to be worthy of it, but, there it is. | |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |