|
| |||||||
| |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Jesus with laser Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 533
+8 Internets | Rogue Trader ? Weaksauce, how about a 7 billion fraud ? The story is kind of similar to the one of Nick Leeson, the trader from the the Bargins Bank in London, who had lost £827 million in 1995, managing to cover up his losses through something like 3 years. This time, it's a french trader working for the Societe Generale, who cost his group 5 billion Euros. French bank SocGen says hit by 4.9 bln euro fraud - washingtonpost.com
__________________ Praise Xenu |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| You can't blame women for what they do wrong in the same way that you can't blame a dog for what it does wrong. Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,401
| That is all sorts of awesome. It probably started with hiding a few million in losses and then after your losses keep growing your like fuck it I might as well keep hiding them because I'm fucked either way. Then you just let it grow to 5 billion euros. HAHA Anyhow, the way the story paints it the whole act was perpetrated by a sole low level trader, but I can't believe this is the case. There must be some oversight, and I wouldn't be surprised to find out that he was used as the scapegoat for some other higher level traders. |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Bonafied Misanthrope Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: ATX
Posts: 903
| I was at the dollar store once in the 90's and they had hard back copies of Amazon.com: Ugly Americans : The True Story of the Ivy League Cowboys Who Raided the Asian Markets for Millions: Books: Ben Mezrich in that book they described a situation a lot like this, where the guy just kept losing on trades and like the quintessential retarded gambler just kept doubling his next bet until someone figured it out and the entire company went into the shitter. Best dollar I ever spent, really. While I doubt the work was anything but fiction it was a look at a sector of the business world (high stakes finance) in which I was totally ignorant. Oh hey the article mentions him: If fraud is proved, the loss will be the biggest caused by a single trader, dwarfing the $1.4 billion loss by trader Nick Leeson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that broke British bank Barings Last edited by Rune : 01-24-2008 at 09:54 AM. |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| You can't blame women for what they do wrong in the same way that you can't blame a dog for what it does wrong. Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,401
| Actually if you want to read a really good and entertaining book about traders I highly recommend Liar's Poker. |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| vurtvertvirtvyrtvort Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: FSJ, BC
Posts: 1,256
| I don't understand how this was possible. Why does this guy have access to dozens of billions dollars? Shouldn't there have been some alarm triggered? Seriously don't they keep track of their employees' transactions? I just don't get it. |
| | |
| | #11 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Paris
Posts: 98
| Official version (from our majesty himself) : "guy was working alone, was able to avoid security checks cause he knew how they were made and did not get richer in the process.Do not worry people your money is safe cause french banking system is ze good". It does smell a lot like bullshit to me but I have no idea which of these parts (if any) is true. |
| | |
| | #12 (permalink) |
| Bonafied Misanthrope Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: ATX
Posts: 903
| I briefly worked in some white collar crime divisions. Based off my total lack of experience, I concluded that it is literally a miracle when you catch someone red-handed, and a conviction is like God himself hand-delivered the evidence to you. It's nearly impossible to prosecute it, I mean, you really have to do something hilariously stupid to flag the attention of someone. Of course most of these guys had more education and training than the police / CPA trying to catch them, so it was difficult, but the cops knew that greed always flushes them out in the end. It's almost sad how many people would embezzle an enormous but not silly amount of money, then more and more every year until it's just ludicrous amounts of money that would be impossible to not notice. |
| | |
| | #13 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: U.K
Posts: 455
| I know someone who works for a company that was awarded a contract to develop a Risk Management system for SocGen... they cancelled the project because they believed it would cost too much... well it cost them $7bln! |
| | |
| | #14 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 702
| I think they pushed off a big loss on one guy. They lost a very small amount of value on the market (like 4%) for basically writing off 7 Billion dollars worth of losses. If they had actually said we are writting off 7 Billion in losses like US brokerage and financial firms I bet they had lost 25% of their value in the market overnight. Pretty smart if you ask me. It's all about damage control. Like I said earlier if this guy could easily cover up BILLIONS of real losses why would that one guy not just embezzle a fraction of that instead and he would still have a job - and be rich. |
| | |
| | #15 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: May 2005 Location: Here and There
Posts: 261
+2 Internets | Quote:
Seconded. | |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |