|
|
Or, use your gamerDNA username: (more...)
| ||||||
| |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| There is no internets Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,175
+1 Internets | ![]() Edit - Nice link, market economy at its finest. I cant wait for the RIFD clothing line to come next. Hope they have my size /sarcasm
__________________ Not a spelling nazi Definitions of LOSE on the Web: fail to keep or to maintain; cease to have, either physically or in an abstract sense; "She lost her purse when she left it unattended on her seat" Definitions of LOOSE on the Web: not restrained or confined or attached; "a pocket full of loose bills"; "knocked the ball loose"; "got loose from his attacker" For EP: |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Thousand Oaks
Posts: 573
| I have worked for 3 companies doing RFID using 13.56 and UHF.. This conspiracy bullshit has been around for a long time. Don't believe any of this "The Government is going to track you shit", they allready can do that via credit cards, ssn, etc... Hell they can track your cell phone and pin point where you are. The chips in this movie are using 13.56Mhz. The read range on these tags is less than a foot for the most part. Scared of a foot? Then wrap the fucking thing in metal. UHF Gen 2 tags can be read reliably around 20 feet but can be interrupted by metal or water pretty easily. Those wallets are fucking hilarious, but would work I guess.... Just don't believe the hype in this movie. They would need to implant tags with some sort of GPS tracking device to track your every movement. The size of that chip would need be pretty damn big, and very fucking expensive.
__________________ riptorn.hyjal |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Lost in the Twilight Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Tempe, Arizona
Posts: 1,272
| The implementations won't be abrasive or will be stealth. Everyday living will 'feel' the same, however the implications are radically different when you move the spotlight on it. This is just more business as usual; theres not a whole lot you can do about it and sooner or later, this will just be another way of life sort of thing. I grew up with a console; I couldn't imagine living without one (and a computer) for the rest of my life --its just as easily apart of my life as anything else. Older, other people are much more apprehensive against the idea. Not all, mind you, but a lot. The good old days they speak of, foreign alien words of walking in the 4th dimension, both ways up hills while doing handstands in 30 foot deep snow. You know, that sort of thing. I've only ran the scenario in my head, simulating the cause and effects of something like this a dozen times over. In the end, nothing will really change. It'll slowly be accepted, as most people don't even realize that a lot of retail goods and other products, along with ID cards have RFID in them already.
__________________ My name is 朱邦 |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) | |
| Lost in the Twilight Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Tempe, Arizona
Posts: 1,272
| Quote:
Of course, this is a extreme case. Not a lot of people would go out of their way to tag themselves and their children willingly. I don't recall the device itself; but its a active device that can be tracked by satellite. I'll go look it up in a second.
__________________ My name is 朱邦 Last edited by Kaosu; 12-05-2007 at 05:41 PM.. | |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Thousand Oaks
Posts: 573
| Quote:
RFID works in that those smalls tags are passive, as in there is no power attached to the tag(the antenna or ic). The tags that pass by a reader get energized by the reader and send back its ID, data etc. A small chip that is being inserted into a human would have to have to be passive. Thus this ultimately limits the read range of a tag. The government would have to install readers in every nook and crany of the universe in order to track you. Active tags which have a power source can and do have gps capability. The size of these tags are pretty big. They are used a lot on the shipping containers at our docks.
__________________ riptorn.hyjal | |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| Registered User | The only thing that concerns me about the RFID chips is the ease with which someone could covertly steal my information. From what I've heard, these things are completely unsecured, and all the data on them could be swiped by someone with a hand-held device standing behind you in line. |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) | |||
| I MAEK ART!! Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,934
+170 Internets | Quote:
Quote:
I like how you just gloss over the thousands of concerns people have with RFID by calling it all "conspiracy bullshit". Since you have worked with 3 different compaines "doing RFID using 13.56 and UHF" I assume you are aware they are suceptable to any number of problems. Any sort of man-in-the-middle security breach would allow anyone to leech any information being passed between two tags. Quote:
![]() Link. They are securless, tracking systems. I don't give a damn if the range is .0002mm, they are still dangerous. | |||
| | |
| | #11 (permalink) | |
| Lost in the Twilight Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Tempe, Arizona
Posts: 1,272
| Quote:
However, there is a company that is working with low-profile GPS tracking devices for everyday consumer use. Watches, cellphones, and whatever else you may think of. Wherify Wireless While I haven't seen any active demonstrations on GPS tracking for implants, I must say I'm sure its getting there. The main problem isn't the size of tracking devices; its the additional of antenna and power supply (that we know of)
__________________ My name is 朱邦 Last edited by Kaosu; 12-05-2007 at 06:06 PM.. | |
| | |
| | #12 (permalink) | ||
| Registered User Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Thousand Oaks
Posts: 573
| Quote:
Yeah I did, lets see you take the gps components of your cell phone and cram them up your ass. Quote:
__________________ riptorn.hyjal | ||
| | |
| | #13 (permalink) |
| I MAEK ART!! Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,934
+170 Internets | Thank you for addressing all my points! I feel much safer about this new technology! So what "point" did I miss? That you're wrong about things getting smaller and smaller? Are they really super secure and those silly nerds at HOPE only faked the cloning of an RFID signal? Are people just making shit up about RFID chips carrying buffer-overflow viruses? I mean if the entire Electronic Product Code network can be shutdown via simple DoS attack, what makes these chips (some of which have EPC data in them) so much better? I look forward to you not answering my obviously conspiracy-like crazy talk with non-answers. You are clearly a shill for "The Man" trying to keep me and my brothers down. |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |