|
|
Or, use your gamerDNA username: (more...)
| ||||||
| |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #31 (permalink) |
| Warning: objects may appear more edible than they actually are Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: The CT
Posts: 6,380
+17 Internets | there are websites that have information on the location of RFID chips in new passports, and how to smash it. Doing such does not invalidate the passport, its just a nice F U to big brother.
__________________ ![]() Brekk SPriest Liesol LOLRet Frstshck Enhance |
| | |
| | #33 (permalink) |
| Warning: objects may appear more edible than they actually are Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: The CT
Posts: 6,380
+17 Internets | dunno off hand, i had a professor last semester in a class called "Computer's Impact on Society" who talked about RFID chips. Very nice guy, but definately felt the use of such chips was heavily encroaching on our personal rights.
__________________ ![]() Brekk SPriest Liesol LOLRet Frstshck Enhance |
| | |
| | #35 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,594
| How would modern RFID systems restrain your personal liberties or mine? Let's use the most ubiquitous example for now, Alien class1 G2 passive tags under Walmart and Target stores' models. How would they restrict your personal liberties exactly? Or can you give me an example of how would active tags like the FasTrak and IPass highway transponders limit your personal liberties then when you can turn it off at any time? From how you guys describe the Al'CIAda and the terrifying competence of America's security apparatus, it really doesn't sound like they'd need to employ RFID at all---and you'd be right---but somehow you're painting a picture of Walmart building towards a Big Brother scenario and you need to help me understand how. |
| | |
| | #37 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Thousand Oaks
Posts: 573
| Quote:
__________________ riptorn.hyjal | |
| | |
| | #38 (permalink) | ||
| I MAEK ART!! Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,923
+166 Internets | Quote:
Quote:
Khorum, every point about RFID chips right now in the present are 100% correct. They help commerce and travel and I am A-OK with that. It's when I am forced to get an RFID-enhanced RealID from my state that HAS to comply with a slew of federal laws that I have an issue. Even then, it's not that I think Big Brother is going to be tracking me real-time via space(which won't be happening anytime soon) that concerns me. It's the fact that it is so incredibly easy to steal all of the information off them or embed a batch virus inside them that I have a real issue with. | ||
| | |
| | #39 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Thousand Oaks
Posts: 573
| How did I know you'd be up my ass the second after I replied. I've been avoiding this thread till someone with a clue popped their head in. And just to quote the article you linked, due to your mad google skills on the topic of rfid: Quote:
edit: and if you even bothered to read that article it said that passports have encryption and most likely these Real IDS will too. SO THERE! WIN! Thread OVER!
__________________ riptorn.hyjal | |
| | |
| | #40 (permalink) | |
| I MAEK ART!! Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,923
+166 Internets | Quote:
I assume you also know that BAC encryption on the standard model being used in the United States has already been cracked. | |
| | |
| | #41 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,879
| I'm not sure why some of you are concentrating so much on the tracking aspect. I can see a point where such a chip would be necessary to function in a society. There wouldn't be any such thing as cash. If you want to be allowed to do anything...doctor visit, public transit, buy food, etc...then it would not be possible without the chip. That's just the public part of it. Technology will get better. There may come a point when a tiny chip can not only record things, but pass them along the next time you use it or even when you don't use it. It could monitor your body. The government could know how many times you have sex, if you aren't eating healthy, etc...there are plenty of possibilities. The step after that is thought and emotion control. I know it seems silly now, but picture yourself in the future. We will have technology that doesn't currently exist. Imagine the government knowing when you have sexual thoughts about someone who isn't your wife. Imagine there being a law that forbids such a thing. Imagine all of a sudden not being able to travel, see doctors, buy things, or whatever else because they detected your "impure thought". After all, they want to protect the sanctity of marriage. Maybe that's crazy, but apply to other examples. What if your boss pisses you off and you fantasize about choking him? Gratz on being arrested for a thought crime. etc... If you keep shrugging off privacy and individual rights you eventually won't have any left. In a perfect world none of these things would matter. But the world isn't perfect. Someone will abuse it. That will end up being parts of the government and criminals. Not that those two things are necessarily different. That's not what's fucked up, though. If these kind of things happen people will get used to them. Go far enough into the future and people will perfectly accept the governments ability to control emotion, thoughts, and whatever else they damn well feel like. They'll not only accept it, but support it. This is the future though. You don't have to give a care unless you have kids. The future comes fast sometimes tho. Last edited by Kolle; 12-07-2007 at 01:27 PM.. |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |