|
|
Or, use your gamerDNA username: (more...)
| ||||||
| |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #91 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,594
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #92 (permalink) |
| Registered User | Well, for one, this looks to be short lived. Despite your claims that one sign of upturn = victory and gg, at least one other important man disagrees. Of course, what's the word of a general who's been there against the opinion and ferve of Khorum? |
| | |
| | #93 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 5
| Unfortunately with links to any other "legitimate" news source, people that don't want to listen to the truth are going to ignore the information either way. It's more or less the equivalent of plugging ones ears and screaming "la la la la la I can't hear you." It's a ridiculously sad day in this country when there is unabashed and stalwart resistance to ANY good news from a war involving US Soldiers. The Yea-but argument is disgraceful. We are succeeding and bringing real hope to the lives of Iraqis and American citizens are reluctant to admit that things are improving. Why be reluctant? Is it to prevent a potential let-down if you were to start being optimistic and something bad happened? Or is it because admitting we are doing better and we are continuing to improve the state of affairs in Iraq is contrary to the outcome you were hoping for? |
| | |
| | #94 (permalink) | ||
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,594
| Quote:
As to why he's bitching about the Press and the Administration NOW---but mostly the press, his actual news conference spent 30 mins on shitting on the press and about 5 mins on the administration, 4 of which was about Rumsfeld---maybe it has a little to do with a certain $200,000 advance check for his new book. That's just a WILD guess though. But hey, that's a good point. Dude hasn't been to Iraq since the Surge and he hasn't even been in the service since he retired in 2006 but I'm sure glad he can tell us how Rumsfeld fucked up the prosecution of the Iraqi Occupation between 2004 and 2005, we REALLY didn't get enough news about that. Quote:
Last edited by Khorum; 11-21-2007 at 09:43 PM.. | ||
| | |
| | #95 (permalink) |
| Definitely a chick Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,743
| Grobbee, sorry buddy, but I've been watching the turnaround in Anbar for the past year. By "watching it" I mean that literally. The "kinetic" (i.e. shoot-em-up bang-bang stuff) is mostly over. There are still very, very light attacks, and IEDs are still being discovered... by Iraqi Police. the fighting is over. Now the tough stuff begins. Governance, economics, infrastructure. All much more challenging than dismantling an insurgency. |
| | |
| | #96 (permalink) |
| Definitely a chick Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,743
| Also, quoting retired generals for support of policy is ridiculous. Most of those guys are political wonks once they get out, parlayed by cynical politicians into an emotional pillar for their policy. We just got lucky that Petraeus knows what the fuck he's doing. Probably the first American general we've had in charge of the whole show over here who does. |
| | |
| | #97 (permalink) | ||
| SOS-dan #76564674 Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Near a big fucking castle, the UK
Posts: 7,159
| Quote:
Quote:
Sorry, no casus belli there. | ||
| | |
| | #99 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,594
| Quote:
So yeah, how exactly were those findings later revealed to be something other than what they are. Because from here it sure looks like they were WMDs. But I agree with you on one thing though: the only casus belli we ever really needed was that Saddam Hussein still lived and his people needed our assistance. | |
| | |
| | #103 (permalink) |
| Flings doodoo and poopoo Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: NYC
Posts: 5,731
| Khorum i think the way the libs explain away all the uranium and other nuclear centrifuges and stuff was that it wasnt yet weaponized or some bullshit. BTW the whole joe wilson Iraq was looking for yellowcake bit was not only confirmed true by the brits but also the russians so we are well beyond the president lied people died, war for oil bullshit. BTW we were in africa under clinton , go watch Black Hawk down and Hotel Rwanda for the reasons why we left there . |
| | |
| | #104 (permalink) |
| Lost in the Twilight Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Tempe, Arizona
Posts: 1,271
| As idealistic as you can get, as I doubt the people and the government will have the drive to push forth to bring about a NWO (not like thats a bad thing). As fervent as you are about the Bush Doctrine, his term is up soon. What if a Democratic gets elected? Or a non neoconservative? Not everyone takes the ball and runs with it, after it gets passed to them. Technology and society always steams ahead, but the ball in the political world changes courts so often that modern-day Crusades usually do not work. The goods and the bads about having such a wide-array of opinions. However, I think you realize that as well. Or maybe I'm just ripped out of my mind after snorting laced coke off supermodel's ass while running away from the police in a stretch limo getting hate head from Ann Coulter all the while the Bush twins are rimjobbing me from behind. ... I hope its the latter.
__________________ My name is 朱邦 |
| | |
| | #105 (permalink) | |
| Lost in the Twilight Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Tempe, Arizona
Posts: 1,271
| Quote:
My opinion? American will stay its proxy war with African warstates for sometime. The Middle-east and Africa will probably be the last places before the World is unified in a world government(s), sometime down the road.
__________________ My name is 朱邦 | |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |