And they impeached Clinton for what?

[AladainAF]

No discussion goes anywhere once the party hatred is introduced.

Imo the democratic party has gone to hell...

Hell in my highschool election I voted for Clinton when he ran against GW but over that 8 years I hated him and his party.

Sad for democrats out there but you guys are fucked come next election also.

Dems seriously need some better candidates.. I'm from NC and I would shoot that pos John Edwards on sight.

Hmmm.

[AladainAF]

Oh, and btw on the plame "leak" or whatever.

CNN.com - Transcripts

BLITZER: But the other argument that's been made against you is that you've sought to capitalize on this extravaganza, having that photo shoot with your wife, who was a clandestine officer of the CIA, and that you've tried to enrich yourself writing this book and all of that.

What do you make of those accusations, which are serious accusations, as you know, that have been leveled against you?

WILSON: My wife was not a clandestine officer the day that Bob Novak blew her identity.

[Astrocreep]

lol the BDS in this thread is quite strong today.
Its kinda hard to out an agent who isnt covert to begin with. there was never any debate of that issue. libby got convicted becuase he lied under oath. you cant call it treason since there was no treasonus act. just some fat boob trying to sell books with a publicist who likely quoted him way way out of context.

[Ashes Emberblade]

Originally Posted by Khorum

They couldn't override one veto.

Normally your posts make me wetter than a schoolgirl reading the latest Tiger Beat, but the House and Senate both overrode Bush's veto of the water resources funding bill.

[Eomer]

hmm, never mind...

[Zyro]

This Democratic congress has had 300 separate investigations of Bush in the year they have been in office and have found no evidence of wrongdoing. Bush Derangement syndrome is hilarious.

[Khorum]

Originally Posted by Ashes Emberblade

Normally your posts make me wetter than a schoolgirl reading the latest Tiger Beat, but the House and Senate both overrode Bush's veto of the water resources funding bill.

I see what u did thar

[Arbuste]

Originally Posted by Khorum

I'm afraid to ask what that stands for. Typo?

Glad you asked. R is for Raving. You know it's true, baby.

And, my dear Khorum, please let me ask you, candidly. You look pretty happy that the Democrats are powerless about all that. But do you support the fact that the President of the US voluntarily outed a CIA agent and - potentially - put her and other agents' lives at risk for that? Or maybe there's an explanation? Or facts I missed?

Also, can you add me on your Myspace?

[Khorum]

If Bush goes in front of a grand jury and says "I DID NOT OUT THAT WOMAN" and then it is proven that he in fact deliberately and willfully exposed that succulent specimen of anglo-saxon milfhood, then I would be on the front line demanding his impeachment.

Remember, if Clinton had gone on the record saying "Hell YEAH I had sex with that chubby jewess high priestess of the Apocalypse, YEEHAW" he would never have been impeached, because that would have been the truth. And the truth has a tendency of ruining a PERJURY indictment.

[Eomer]

That wasn't the question you were asked. You weren't asked if Bush was guilty of perjury. You were asked if you think it's okay for Bush to release a CIA operative's identity to fulfill a personal vendetta against her husband.

[Zyro]

Richard Armitage anyone? Buellar?

[Khorum]

Originally Posted by Eomer

That wasn't the question you were asked. You weren't asked if Bush was guilty of perjury. You were asked if you think it's okay for Bush to release a CIA operative's identity to fulfill a personal vendetta against her husband.

Heh are you trying to get me to say it's ok? It's not OK for Bush to strangle cute emo webwhores. It's not OK for Bush to speedball pure cheese heroin directly into his cranium. And it's not OK for Bush to out CIA honeypots posing as slutty hollywood socialites while trolling for loose-lipped African bureaucrats. It's not OK for ANY reason, even if it's because their husbands are obviously vindictive partisans out for fat publisher advance checks.

But since there's as much concrete evidence of Bush strangling togi-chan or shooting up cheap heroin as of Bush gleefully signing Plame's burn notice, I just cut to the chase and discussed the feasibility of any type of political acumen magically erupting out of this congress's collective noggin sufficient for a realistic impeachment threat. IE: jack shit.

[Eomer]

I wasn't trying to put words in your mouth or paint you into a corner. I'm just honestly curious what your opinion on the situation is. Do you honestly think that the Plame affair was NOT an intentional attack on Wilson? And that at the very least Bush or Cheney had an idea what was going on, if not personally asked for it? Evidence aside, just your opinion. We all know Bush isn't going to be impeached for this or anything else.

[Itzena]

Originally Posted by Khorum

If Bush goes in front of a grand jury and says "I DID NOT OUT THAT WOMAN" and then it is proven that he in fact deliberately and willfully exposed that succulent specimen of anglo-saxon milfhood, then I would be on the front line demanding his impeachment.

Remember, if Clinton had gone on the record saying "Hell YEAH I had sex with that chubby jewess high priestess of the Apocalypse, YEEHAW" he would never have been impeached, because that would have been the truth. And the truth has a tendency of ruining a PERJURY indictment.

So perjury = bad but treason = good?

[Millie]

Originally Posted by Khorum

...succulent specimen of anglo-saxon milfhood.

...who was Jewish, FYI. "Plame" was shortened from the Ukranian surname Plamevotski.

Originally Posted by Khorum

...CIA honeypots posing as slutty hollywood socialites while trolling for loose-lipped African bureaucrats.

She lived in D.C. Don't bring Hollywood into this. :P