|
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Banned Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 1,599
| Cold fusion well, i'm not one to post "serious business" usually but found this fairly interesting http://www.scienceblog.com/cms/ny_te...ion_10017.html so the device isn't that useful for producing large amounts of energy yet, however, as the team notes, it has other important scientific uses related to being able to well, produce neutrons...these include security scanners for bombs and the like in scanning through most materials, as well as medical applications such as in X-ray machines and radiation therapy for cancer discuss Last edited by Metranon : 02-13-2006 at 03:31 PM. |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 725
+1 Internets | 100% of reports of cold fusion so far are total bullshit, what they usually don't say is that they're using a generator the size of a half a city block to create theoretical fusion between like 2 atoms. Sure it's "cold", there isn't enough energy to power a grasshopper fart. Anyway, without really being able to tell what they're actually doing from that article I'll tell you the best way to determine if scientific theory XYZ is true or desparate scamming to maintain one's research grant. After the dude has published in some major paper the details of his work then if 100 different labs in different countries (and preferably different continents) can reproduce the experiment in their own labs, then you're on to something. Two labs in the same country headed by two old college buddies doesn't count. /cynicism off |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Banned Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 1,599
| supposedly this machine creates 200,000 electron volts of power, which is enough neutrons for use in X-ray machines and security detectors also this fusion takes place at room temperature as opposed to previous experiements which had hugely larger costs because they required extremely low temperatures to achieve a fusion reaction. |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 239
| Do you understand how little power 200,000 electron volts is? from a website: Approximate energy of an electron striking a color television screen.......20,000 eV Its about 24 orders of magnitude away from something useful Last edited by Neppy : 02-14-2006 at 02:48 AM. |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Pope of the Cathan Throng! Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: N.C. yes we're all inbred rednecks
Posts: 975
| I read about some cold fusion experiment where they were financed over a billion dollars to build it and it ran off the power of a 120 AC standard home outlet. Basically they came up with this idea to chainlink a bazillion volts of electricity stored in this big system to get the thing started but it didn't take some massive generator to pull it off. Maybe in the end their method to mass produce the energy from 1 standard outlet is more impressive than the cold fusion, I really don't know.
__________________ In response to the brilliant idea of paying a crackwhore to tattoo FOHSS on her tits... Quote: Originally Posted by twiztid_420 i have access to a tat gun and some crackheads as i live relatively close to the "ghetto" it aint much here but there definantly is an abundance of crackheads, lol @ donating the money, i was gonna do that idea for a digi cam and anyone who donates get there name on the titties, a truly personalised pic.lol |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| You mean I can change this? Neat! Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,807
+29 Internets | Zaniel's scepticism is misplaced. This setup isn't designed to produce power or anything like that, it's designed to produce neutrons for medical tests and that sort of thing. This is actually a fairly big deal that someone's reproduced the results from about a year ago from a seperate team. They still don't quite understand the physics and chemistry behind these experiments. Up until last year, no one even believed cold fusion was possible. |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 2,118
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #11 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Georgia
Posts: 333
| cause my physics prof said so... here... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyroelectric_fusion Quote:
__________________ Archimonde Last edited by Benito Fireslinger : 02-15-2006 at 08:00 PM. | |
| | |
| | #12 (permalink) |
| You mean I can change this? Neat! Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,807
+29 Internets | Meh, I guess it depends on what your definition of "cold fusion" is. My impression was that it basically was any process that has nuclear fusion take place at reasonably normal temperatures (ie: not several million degrees kelvin in a massive magnetic containment field). |
| | |
| | #14 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Georgia
Posts: 333
| If this was actual cold fusion then it would have garnered ALOT more fame than this. Cold Fusion would theoretically solve the world's energy crisis. Quote:
__________________ Archimonde | |
| | |
| | #15 (permalink) |
| You mean I can change this? Neat! Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,807
+29 Internets | Reading the definition you just gave, I'm not sure why this "pyroelectric fusion" experiment isn't considered cold fusion (other than it not producing a net gain in energy). It pretty much mirrors the definition I gave. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |